Skip to main content
Log in

A principled characterization of dislocated phrases: Capturing barriers with Static Discontinuity Grammars

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parsing according to the principles of modern linguistic theory is only now becoming a computationally interesting task. We contribute to these developments by illustrating how the account of movement introduced by Chomsky inBarriers can be incorporated into a Static Discontinuity Grammar (SDG). We are concerned with A'-movement as reflected inwh movement of arguments and adjuncts. The resulting SDG can be processed by an SDG parser to recover the thematic information and constitutency structure associated with a natural language sentence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Harvey: 1991, ‘Definite Feature Grammars for Natural and Formal Languages: An Introduction to the Formalism’, in C. G. Brown and G. Koch (eds.),Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, III pp. 213–225. Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, M., Charles Brown, Veronica Dahl, D. Massam and T. Pattabhiraman: 1986, ‘Translation of Meaning Representation from MRI into English’, Technical Report LCCR TR 86-4, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, Robert C.: 1991, ‘Principles of Principle-Based Parsing’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Bresnan, Joan and L. Moshi: 1990, ‘Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax’,Linguistic Inquiry 21, 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles: 1987, ‘Generating Spanish Clitics Using Static Discontinuity Grammar’, PhD thesis Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar pp. 184–221. Ginn and Co., Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, the Pisa Lectures. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1982,Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Barriers. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, Matthew: 1991a, ‘Multiple Meta-Interpreters in a Logical Model of Sentence Parsing’, in C. G. Brown and G. Koch (eds.),Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, III pp. 127–145. Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, Matthew: 1991b, ‘A Principle-Based System for Syntactic Analysis’,Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Veronica: 1986, ‘Gramaticas Discontinuas: una Herramienta Computacional con Aplicaciones en la Teoria de Reccion y Ligamiento’,Revista Argentina de Lingüística 2(2), 375–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Veronica: Discontinuous Grammars’,Computational Intelligence 5(4), 161–79.

  • Dorr, Bonnie J.: 1991, ‘Principle-Based Parsing for Machine Translation’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 153–84. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Dahl, Veronica and Fred Popowich: 1990, ‘Parsing and Generation with Static Discontinuity Grammars’,New Generation Computing 8, 245–274, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Veronica, Fred Popowich and Michael Rochemont: ‘Implementing Barriers with Static Discontinuity Grammar’, manuscript in progress.

  • Epstein, S. S.: 1991, ‘Principle-Based Interpretation of Natural Language Quantifiers’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 185–98. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Fong, Sandiway: 1991a, ‘The Computational Implementation of Principled Parsers’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 65–82. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Fong, Sandiway: 1991b, ‘Principle-Based Parsing and Type Inference’, in C. G. Brown and G. Koch (eds.),Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, III pp. 43–60. Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert: 1990, ‘Computation and Linguistic Theory: A Government Binding Theory Parser Using Tree Adjoining Grammar’, Technical Report MS-CIS-90-29, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemri, Lila: 1991, ‘Specification and Implementation of a GB Parser’, in C. G. Brown and G. Koch (eds.),Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, III pp. 111–26. Elsevier, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990,Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1990,Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Mark: 1988, ‘Move-α and the Unfold-Fold Transformation’, Technical report, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT.

  • Johnson, Mark: 1991, ‘Deductive Parsing: The Use of Knowledge of Language’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 39–64. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Kazman, R.: 1991b, ‘Parsing with Changing Grammars: Evaluating a Language Acquisition Model’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 239–255. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito: 1984, ‘On the Nature of Proper Government’,Linguistic Inquiry 15(2), 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Fernando C. N. and David H. D. Warren: 1980, ‘Definite Clause Grammars for Natural Language Analysis — a Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Transition Networks’,Artificial Intelligence 13, 231–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990,Relativized Minimality. MIT Press.

  • Ross, John, R.: 1967,Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD thesis, MIT.

  • Sharp, Randall: 1985, ‘A Model of Grammar Based on Principles of Government and Binding’, Master's thesis, University of British Columbia.

  • Stabler, Edward P.: 1988, ‘Parsing with Explicit Representations of Syntax Constraints’, in V. Dahl and P. Saint-Dizier (eds.),Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming II, pp. 15–28. North-Holland Publishing Co..

  • Stabler, Edward P.: 1991, ‘Avoid the Pedestrian's Paradox’, in R. C. Berwick, S. P. Abney and C. Tenny (eds.),Principle-Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguisties, pp. 199–237. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahl, V., Popowich, F. & Rochemont, M. A principled characterization of dislocated phrases: Capturing barriers with Static Discontinuity Grammars. Linguist Philos 16, 331–352 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985271

Keywords

Navigation