Skip to main content
Log in

Reaction norms of juvenile traits to light intensity inIris pumila (Iridaceae): A comparison of populations from exposed and shaded habitats

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reaction norms were determined in two natural populations of the perennial plantIris pumila from contrasting light conditions at two levels of photosynthetically active radiation (105 and 35 µmol m−2s−1). Seedlings developed from free-pollinated seed families sampled individually from 19 and 12 randomly selected clonal genotypes in an exposed and a shaded population respectively, were grown in a growth room using a mixed model nested factorial experimental design and scored for a number of phenological and morphological traits. Ambient light conditions significantly affected all of the juvenile traits measured. In both populations, relatively convergent norms of reactions were revealed for leaf appearance dates, as well as for leaf number, suggesting the importance of these traits for functional adjustment to prevailing light conditions. Reaction norms for morphological traits, however, were largely nonparallel, but although often crossing each other, a significant family-by-treatment interaction in the ANCOVAs performed was not detected for any of the traits measured, indicating a small amount of genetic variation for plasticity in these populations. The extent of plastic response to light availability was determined and expressed as an index that estimates the percentage change in a trait value from a high to a low light level. Evolutionary and ecological implications of the observed plastic variations are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avramov, S., Tucić, B., 1995: Quantitative-genetic analysis of the juvenile traits inIris pumila. — Arch. Biol. Sci. (Belgrade)47: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, F. A., 1979: The physiological ecology of plant succession. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.10: 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: The response of annual plants to multiple stresses. — InWinner, W., Pell, E., Mooney, H. M., (Eds): The response of plants to multiple stresses, pp. 283–299. — San Diego, California: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, O., 1980: Responses to different quantum flux densities. — InPirson, A., Zimmerman, M. H., (Eds): Encyclopedia of plant physiology,12A, pp. 57–107. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A. D., 1965: Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. — Advances Genet.13: 115–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick, G. P., 1995: Genotypic variation and plasticity of clonal growth in relation to nutrient availability inAmphibromus scabrivalvis. — J. Ecol.83: 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. P., Edwards, K. J. R., 1961: The genetic control of leaf development inLolium. I. Assessment of genetic variation. — Heredity16: 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M., 1995: Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modifications due to physiological integration. — Oecologia101: 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. C., 1972: The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Studies in ecology,1. — Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S., 1990: Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. — Genet. Res.56: 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter, A. H., Hay, R. K. M., 1981: Environmental physiology of plants. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. D., 1992: The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. — Evolution46: 540–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilets, S., Scheiner, S. M., 1993: The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. V. Evolution of reaction norm shape. — J. Evol. Biol.6: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulkiewicz, R., Kirkpatrick, M., 1992: Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. — Evolution46: 390–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, D. de, 1990: Quantitative genetics of reaction norms. — J. Evol. Biol.3: 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, R. E., Kronenberg, G. H. M., (Eds), 1994: Photomorphogenesis in plants. 2nd edn. — Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhlein, F., 1981:Iris. — Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, G. A., Johnson, D. E., 1984: Analysis of messy data.1. Designed experiments. — Belmont: Wadsvorth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platenkamp, G. A. J., Shaw, R. G., 1992: Environmental and genetic constraints on adaptive population differentiation inAnthoxanthum odoratum. — Evolution46: 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F., 1955: The geographic distribution of European and eastern Mediterranean species of beardedIris. — Iris Year Book1955: 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1989: SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6. 4th edn. — Cary, N. C.: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S. M., 1993: Plasticity as selectable trait: reply toVia. — Amer. Naturalist:142: 371–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C. D., 1986: The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. — Annual. Rev. Ecol. Syst.17: 667–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Control of phenotypic plasticity via regulatory genes. — Amer. Naturalist142: 367–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I. I., 1949: Factors of evolution: the theory of stabilizing selection. — Philadelphia: Blakiston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, J., 1993: Reaction norms of morphological and life-history traits to light availability inImpatiens capensis. — Evolution47: 1654–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1981: Biometry. 2nd edn. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. C., 1992: The evolution of life histories. — New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, S. E., 1987: Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. — Evol. Biol.21: 127–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. — Acta Bot. Neerl.44: 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Phenotypic plasticity inPolygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. — Evolution47: 1009–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., 1991: Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change. — Trends Ecol. Evol.6: 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas, A., 1986: Resource allocation under poor growth conditions. A major role for growth substances in developmental plasticity. — InJennings, D. H., Trewavas, A. J., (Eds): Plasticity in plants, pp. 31–76. — Scarborough, North Yorkshire: The Company of Biologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucić, B., Avramov, S., 1996: Maternal effects on early juvenile traits inIris pumila. — Pl. Syst. Evol.201: 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Genetic distance and organization of isoenzyme variation in severalIris species. — Biosistematika10: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Clonal diversity and dispersion inIris pumila. — Acta Oecol. Oecol. Pl.9: 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Via, S., 1984: The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. — Evolution38: 896–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by product of selection in variable environment? — Amer. Naturalist142: 352–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. — Evolution39: 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Evolution of genetic viability in spatially variable environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. — Genet. Res.49: 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, D. B., McKell, C. M., Green, L. R., 1966: Seedling vigor and the early nonphotosynthetic stage of seedling growth in grasses. — Crop Sci.6: 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhivotovsky, L. A., Marcus, F. W., Bergman, A., 1996: On the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in a spatially heterogeneous environment. — Evolution50: 547–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pemac, D., Tucić, B. Reaction norms of juvenile traits to light intensity inIris pumila (Iridaceae): A comparison of populations from exposed and shaded habitats. Pl Syst Evol 209, 159–176 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985227

Key words

Navigation