Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 212, Issue 1–2, pp 31–51 | Cite as

Relationships among species inCarex sect.Phyllostachys (Cyperaceae) based on allozyme divergence

  • Bruce A. Ford
  • Julian R. Starr
  • D. A. Ross McQueen
  • Robert F. C. Naczi
Article

Abstract

Allozyme variation was examined inCarex sect.Phyllostachys (Cyperaceae) to provide insight into phylogenetic relationships hypothesized in an earlier study and to determine the degree of genetic differentiation within and between taxa. Genetic identity values are concordant with the morphological differences found between species. The lowest values are found between species with the greatest morphological dissimilarity. Conversely, the highest values are associated with species pairs distinguished by relatively few morphological differences. Conspecific populations possess high genetic identities, although interpopulation differentiation has characterized the evolutionary history of some species. Geographic patterning is also evident within species, with geographically proximate populations often having the highest identity values. Phylogenetic trees produced using different cladistic methods were poorly supported and varied in their depiction of relationships among species. One cladogram produced using presence/absence allelic data is more or less congruent with a topology recovered from an earlier analysis utilizing molecular and morphological data. The wide- and narrow-scaled clades are maintained as are the sister species pairsC. backii/C. saximontana, C. basiantha/C. superata, andC. jamesii/C. juniperorum. Contrary to the finding of our previous study, however,C. willdenowii is aligned withC. jamesii/C. juniperorum.

Key words

Cyperaceae Carex Allozyme divergence phylogenetic relationships species delimitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boivin, B., 1967: Énumération des plantes du Canada VI. Monopsides, 2éme partie. — Naturaliste Canad.94: 471–528.Google Scholar
  2. Bremer, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evolution42: 795–803.Google Scholar
  3. Bruederle, L. P., Fairbrothers, D. E., 1986: Allozyme variation in populations of theCarex crinita complex (Cyperaceae). — Syst. Bot.11: 583–594.Google Scholar
  4. , 1991: Genetic differentiation ofCarex flava andCarex viridula in western Europe (Cyperaceae). — Syst. Bot.16: 41–49.Google Scholar
  5. Budd, A. C., 1979:Budd's Flora of the Canadian prairie provinces. Revised byLooman J., Best, K. F. — Agriculture Canada Publication 1662.Google Scholar
  6. Buth, D. G., 1984: The application of electrophoretic data in systematic studies. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.15: 501–522.Google Scholar
  7. Catling, P. M., Reznicek, A. A., Crins, W. J., 1993:Carex juniperorum (Cyperaceae), a new species from northeastern North America, with a key toCarex sect.Phyllostachys. — Syst. Bot.18: 496–501.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, D. J., 1983: Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. — InTanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J., (Eds): Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, part A, pp. 257–287. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Crins, W. J., 1990: Phylogenetic considerations below the sectional level inCarex. — Canad. J. Bot.68: 1433–1440.Google Scholar
  10. , in prep:Carex sect.Phyllostachys. InFlora of North America Editorial Committee (Eds), 1993+: Flora of North America north of Mexico.3+ vols. — New York: Oxford University Press. Vol.24.Google Scholar
  11. Dorn, R. D., 1988: Vascular plants of Wyoming. — Cheyenne: Mountain West Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, B. A., Ball, P. W., Ritland, K., 1991: Allozyme diversity and genetic relationships among North American members of the short-beaked taxa ofCarex sect.Vesicariae (Cyperaceae). — Syst. Bot.16: 116–131.Google Scholar
  14. , 1998a: Allozyme variation and genetic relationships among species in theCarex willdenowii complex (Cyperaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.85: 546–552.Google Scholar
  15. , 1998b: The impact of species—specific traits and phylogenetic relatedness on allozyme diversity inCarex sect.Phyllostachys (Cyperaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.212: 13–29.Google Scholar
  16. Gerwin, J. A., Zink, R. M., 1989: Phylogenetic patterns in the genusHeliodoxa (Aves:Trochilidae): an allozymic perspective. — Wilson Bull.101: 525–544.Google Scholar
  17. Gleason, H. A., Cronquist, A., 1991: Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd eds. — Bronx: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  18. Gottlieb, L. D., 1977: Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.64: 161–180.Google Scholar
  19. , 1981: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — In Progr. Phytochem.7: 1–46.Google Scholar
  20. Hermann, F. J., 1970: Manual of the carices of the Rocky Mountains and Colorado Basin. Agriculture Handbook No. 374. — Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  21. Holmgren, P. K., Holmgren, N. H., Barnett, L. C., 1990: Index Herbariorum. Part I: the herbaria of the World. 8th edn. — Bronx: New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  22. Hudson, J. H., 1977:Carex in Saskatchewan. — Saskatoon: Bison Publishing House.Google Scholar
  23. Kolstad, O. A., 1986:Cyperaceae. — In Great Plains Flora Association (Ed.): Flora of the Great Plains. — Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  24. Kral, R., 1983: A report on some rare, threatened, or endangered forest-related vascular plants of the south. 1Isoetaceae throughEuphorbiaceae. — USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Technical Publication R8-TP 2.Google Scholar
  25. Mabee, P. M., Humphries, J., 1993: Coding polymorphic data: examples from allozymes and ontogeny. — Syst. Biol.42: 166–181.Google Scholar
  26. Mackenzie, K. K., 1935:Cyperaceae-Cariceae. — North American Flora18: 1–478.Google Scholar
  27. Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0 — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  28. McClintock, K. A., Waterway, M. J., 1994: Genetic differentiation betweenCarex lasiocarpa andC. pellita (Cyperaceae) in North America. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 224–231.Google Scholar
  29. Mickevich, M. F., Johnson, M. S., 1976: Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution. — Syst. Zool.25: 260–270.Google Scholar
  30. Miyamoto, M. M., 1981: Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genusLeptodactylus. — Syst. Zool.30: 281–290.Google Scholar
  31. Moss, E. H., 1983: Flora of Alberta, 2nd edn, revised byPacker, J. G. — Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Naczi, R. F. C., Reznicek, A. A., Ford, B. A., 1998: Morphologic, geographic, and ecologic differentiation in theCarex willdenowii complex. — Amer. J. Bot.85: 434–447.Google Scholar
  33. Nei, M., 1978: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. — Genetics89: 583–590.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, B. J., 1986: Allozyme electrophoresis: a handbook for animal systematics and population studies. — Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scoggan, H. J., 1978: The flora of Canada. Part 2.Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Monocotyledoneae. — Canad. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Publ. Bot.7 (2).Google Scholar
  36. Starr, J. R., 1997: The origin and phylogenetic position ofCarex sectionPhyllostachys in the genusCarex (Cyperaceae). — M. Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  37. , 1995: Phylogeny and character evolution inCarex sectionPhyllostachys (Cyperaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.82: 164–165.Google Scholar
  38. , 1996: Phylogeny and sectional delimitation inCarex (Cyperaceae) using sequences from the internal transcribed spacer of nrDNA. — Amer. J. Bot.83: 194.Google Scholar
  39. , 1997: Testing phylogenetic hypotheses inCarex (Cyperaceae) using sequences from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nr DNA. — Amer. J. Bot.84: 235.Google Scholar
  40. Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. — Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  41. , 1981: BIOSYS-1: a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in genetics. User's manual. — Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, T. M. C., 1983: The sedge genera of British Columbia. — British Columbia Provincial Museum, Handbook 43.Google Scholar
  43. Waterway, M. J., 1990: Genetic differentiation and hybridization betweenCarex gynodynama andC. mendocinensis (Cyperaceae) in California. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 826–838.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce A. Ford
    • 1
  • Julian R. Starr
    • 1
  • D. A. Ross McQueen
    • 1
  • Robert F. C. Naczi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesNorthern Kentucky UniversityHighland HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations