Abstract
The importance of ants for pollination in the dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae), a Tertiary palaeoendemic plant of the Pyrenees (NE Iberian Peninsula) was studied. The frequency of different visitors (ants, lady beetles, andDiptera) to staminate and pistillate flowers was quantified, and their effectiveness as pollinators was examined by means of fruit and seed set in selective experimental exclusions. Although ants were less abundant on flowers than other visitors, they were the most effective pollinators. Some qualitative factors of this mutualistic ant-plant interaction may account for their effectiveness: the small size of the ants, their high visitation rate to pistillate flowers, and the lack of reduction in viability of the pollen transported on the integument. In addition, the sedentary nature of ants assures their presence during the flowering period. The most abundant floral visitors ofB. pyrenaica were therefore not the most effective pollinators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ågren, J., Elmquist, T., Tunlid, A., 1986: Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioeciousRubus chamaemorus L. — Oecologia70: 332–338.
Armstrong, J. E., Irvine, A. K., 1989: Floral biology ofMyristica insipida (Myristicaceae), a distinctive beetle pollination syndrome. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 86–94.
Arnold, R. M., 1982: Pollination, predation and seed set inLinaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). — Amer. Midl. Naturalist107: 360–369.
Arroyo, M. T. K., Primack, R., Armesto, J., 1982: Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. — Amer. J. Bot.69: 82–97.
Baker, H. G., 1976: “Mistake” pollination as a reproductive system with special reference to theCaricaceae. — InBurley, J., Styles, B. T., (Eds): Tropical trees. Variation, breeding and conservation, pp. 161–169. — London: Academic Press.
Bawa, K. S., 1980a: Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst11: 15–39.
—, 1980b: Mimicry of male by female flowers and intra-sexual competetion for pollinators inJacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith)Woodson (Caricaceae). — Evolution34: 467–474.
—, 1975: Dioecism in tropical forest trees. — Evolution29: 167–179.
Beattie, A. J., 1985: The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—, 1984: Ant inhibition of pollen function: a possible reason why ant pollination is rare. — Amer. J. Bot.71: 421–426.
—,Jobson, S., Knox, B., 1985: The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions: evidence and some evolutionary implications. — Amer. J. Bot.72: 606–614.
—, 1986: Antibiotic production: a possible function for the metapleural glands of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). — Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer.79: 448–450.
Charlesworth, D., 1993: Why are unisexual flowers associated with wind pollination and unspecialized pollinators? — Amer. Naturalist141: 481–490.
Faegri, K., van der Pijl, L., 1979: The principles of pollination ecology. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Fox, J. F., 1985: Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal. — Oecologia67: 244–249.
Freeman, C., Harper, K. T., Ostler, W. K., 1980: Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. — Oecologia44: 410–417.
García, M. B., 1993: Biología reproductiva y ecología de plantas endémicas relictas de los Pirineos. — Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
—, 1995: Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in the dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). — Oecologia101: 59–67.
Gómez, J. M., Zazora, R., 1992: Pollination by ants: consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system. — Oecologia91: 410–418.
Hagen, K. S., 1962: Biology and ecology of predaceousCoccinellidae. — Annu. Rev. Entomol.7: 289–326.
Herrera, C. M., 1987: Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse assemblage. — Oikos50: 79–90.
—, 1989: Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator system. — Oecologia80: 241–248.
—, 1984: Nectar thievery by ants from southern Spanish insect-pollinated flowers. — Insectes Sociaux31: 142–154.
Heslop-Harrison, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y., 1970: Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. — Stain Technol.45: 115–120.
—,Shivanna, K. R., 1984: The evaluation of pollen quality, and a further appraisal of the fluorochromatic (FCR) test procedure. — Theor. Appl. Genet.67: 367–375.
Hickman, J. C., 1974: Pollination by ants: a low-energy system. — Science184: 1290–1292.
Hull, D. A., Beattie, A. J., 1988: Adverse effects on pollen exposed toAtta texana and other North American ants: implications for ant pollination. — Oecologia75: 153–155.
Iwanami, Y., Iwadare, T., 1978: Inhibiting effects of myrmicacin on pollen growth and pollen tube mitosis. — Bot. Gaz.139: 42–45.
Kreitzer, S., Iperti, G., 1984: Importance des sommets de moyenne altitude dans la survie d'une coccinelle aphidipahage. — Acta Biol. Mont.4: 93–98.
Little, R. J., 1983: A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. — InJones, C. E., Little, R. J., (Eds): Handbook of experimental pollination biology, pp. 294–309. — New York: Scientific and Academic Editions.
Motten, A. F., 1986: Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. — Ecol. Monogr.56: 21–42.
Muenchow, G. T., 1987: Is dioecy associated with fleshy fruit? — Amer. J. Bot.74: 287–293.
Peakall, R., 1989: The unique pollination ofLeporella fimbriata (Orchidaceae): pollination by pseudocopulating male ants (Myrmecia urens, Formicidae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.167: 137–148.
—, 1989: Pollination of the orchidMicrotis parviflora R. Br. by flightless worker ants. — Functional Ecology3: 515–522.
—,James, S. H., 1987: Pseudocopulation of an orchid by male ants: a test of two hypotheses accounting for the rarity of ant pollination. — Oecologia73: 522–524.
—, 1990: The significance of ant and plant traits for ant pollination inLeporella fimbriata. — Oecologia84: 457–460.
—, 1991: The evidence for, and importantce of, ant pollination. — InHuxley, C. R., Cutter, D. F., (Eds): Ant-plant interactions, pp. 421–429. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petersen, B., 1977a: Pollination by ants in the alpine tundra of Colorado. — Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci.70: 349–355.
—, 1977b: Pollination ofThlaspi alpestre by selfing and by insects in the alpine zone of Colorado. — Arctic Alp. Res.9: 211–215.
Primack, R. B., Silander, J. A., 1975: Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. — Nature255: 143–144.
Proctor, M., Yeo, P., 1973: The pollination of flowers. — London: Collins.
Renner, S. S., Feil, J. P., 1993: Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 1100–1107.
Schemske, D. W., Horvitz, C. C., 1984: Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. — Science225: 519–522.
—, 1989: Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. — Evolution43: 461–465.
Veal, D. A., Trimble, J. E., Beattie, A. J., 1992: Antimicrobial properties of secretions from the metapleural glands ofMyrmecia gulosa (the Australian bull ant). — J. Appl. Bact.72: 188–194.
Warren, S. D., Harper, K. T., Booth, G. M., 1988: Elevational distribution of insect pollinators. — Amer. Midl. Naturalist120: 325–330.
Willson, M. F., Ågren, J., 1989: Differential floral rewards and pollination by deceit in unisexual flowers. — Oikos55: 23–29.
Zar, J. H., 1984: Biostatistical analysis. — New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García, M.B., Antor, R.J. & Espadaler, X. Ant pollination of the palaeoendemic dioeciousBorderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae) . Pl Syst Evol 198, 17–27 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985105
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985105