Abstract
Petri dish choice tests conducted on the coffee berry borer (CBB),Hypothenemus hampei, showed that females were able to discriminate between coffee berries at different ripening stages. A Y-shaped glass olfactometer was used to demonstrate that coffee berries emitted volatile chemicals that elicited upwind movement by female CBB. Olfactometer tests with three different solvent extracts of berries showed that at least some of the attractive chemical(s) released by the coffee berries could be extracted with acetone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, P.S. 1984. Some aspects of the behavior of the coffee berry borer in relation to its control in southern Mexico (Coleoptera, Scolytidae).Folia Entomol. Mex. 61:9–24.
Bartra, C., Urrelo, R., andRodriguez, R. 1981. Biologica de la broca del cafeHypothenemus hampei Ferr. (Coleoptera, Ipide) en Tingo Maria.Tropicultura 14:17–31.
Blackmer, J.L., andPhelan, P.L. 1991. Behavior ofCarpophilus hemipterus in a vertical flight chamber: Transition from phototactic to vegetative orientation.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58:137–148.
Borbon-Martinez, O. 1989. Bioécologie d'un ravageur des baies du caféierHypothenemus hampei Ferr (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) et de ses parasitoides au Togo. PhD thesis. University P. Sabatier de Toulouse, France, 185 pp.
Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Miller, D.R., andSlessor, K.N. 1986. Orientation in forest coleoptera: An uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli, pp. 97–109,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanism in Insect Olfaction. Clarenden Press, Oxford.
Brun, L.O., Marcillaud, C., Gaudichon, V., andSuckling, D.M. 1989. Endosulfan resistance in coffee berry borer,Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Solytidae) in New Caledonia.J. Econ. Entomol. 82:1311–1316.
Brun, L.O., Marcillaud, C., Gaudichon, V., andSuckling, D.M. 1990. Monitoring of endo-sulfan and lindane resistance in the coffee berry borerHypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Caledonia.Bull. Entomol. Res. 80:129–135.
Corbett, G.H. 1933. Some preliminary observations on the coffee berry beetle borer,Stephanoderes (Cryphalus) hampei Ferr.Malay. Agric. J. 21:8–22.
Giordanengo, P. 1992. Biologie, écoéthologie et dynamique des populations du scolyte des grains de caféHypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) (Coléoptère, Scolytidae) en Nouvelle Calédonie. Thesis. Université de Rennes 1, 110 pp.
Le Pelley, R.H. 1968. Pests of coffee. Tropical Science Series. Longmans, Green and Co., 590 pp. London.
Morallo-Rejesus, B., andBaldos, E. 1980. The biology of the coffee berry borerHypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) (Scolytidae, Coleoptera) and its incidence in the southern tagalog provinces.Philipp. Entomol. 4:303–316.
Munoz, R. 1989. Ciclo biologico y reproduccion partenogenética de la Broca del fruto del cafetoHypothenemus hampei (Ferr.).Turrialba 39:415–421.
Prokopy, R.J. 1986. Visual and olfactory stimulus interaction in resource finding by insects, pp. 81–89,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanism in Insect Olfaction. Clarenden Press, Oxford.
Reid, J.C., andMansingh, A. 1985. Economic losses due toHypothenemus hampei Ferr. during processing of coffee berries in Jamaica.Trop. Pest. Manag. 31:55–59.
Schmitz, G., andCrisinel, P. 1957. La lutte contreStephanoderes hampei Ferr. Publication I.N.E.A.C. 70, 156 pp.
Wellington, W.G. 1980. Dispersal and population change, pp. 11–24,in A.A. Berryman, and L. Safranyik, (eds.). Dispersal of Forest Insects: Evaluation, Theory, and Management Implications. Washington State University, Pullman.
Waterhouse, D.F., andNorris, K.R. 1989. Biological control:Hypothenemus hampei, in Pacific prospects. Supplement 1. Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research, Canberra, 123 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giordanengo, P., Brun, L.O. & Frerot, B. Evidence for allelochemical attraction of the coffee berry borer,Hypothenemus hampei, by coffee berries. J Chem Ecol 19, 763–769 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985007