Abstract
The annual Mediterranean herbTheligonum cynocrambe shows a peculiar combination of morphological characters, e.g., switch from decussate to spiral phyllotaxis with 90–100° divergence, combined with a change from interpetiolar to lateral stipules, anemophily, lack of calyx, flowers often dimerous to trimerous, corolla fused in both male and female flowers, male flowers extra-axillary, with 2–19 stamens per flower, female flowers axillary, with inferior uniovulate ovary, basilateral style and perianth, nut-like fruits with elaiosome. In male flowers the androecium emerges as an (uneven) elliptical rim with a central depression. This common girdling primordium is divided up into several stamen primordia. In male flowers with low stamen number the stamen primordia may occupy the corners alternating with the corolla lobes. There are no epipetalous androecial primordia that secondarily divide into stamens. Male flowers occasionally show a hemispherical base that may be interpreted as remnant of the inferior ovary. In female flowers a ring primordium grows into a tube on which the petal lobes arise. The perianth and style become displaced adaxially by uneven growth of the inferior ovary. The ovary is basically bilocular. The lower region of the ovary is provided with a septum that is overtopped and hidden by the single curved ovule.Theligonum is referred to theRubiaceae-Rubioideae, with theAnthospermeae andPaederieae as most closely related tribes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balicka-Iwanowska, G., 1897: Die Morphologie desThelygonum cynocrambe. — Flora83: 357–366.
Behnke, H.-D., Mabry, T. J., (Eds), 1994:Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Bremer, B., 1996: Phylogenetic studies withinRubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 33–50.
—, 1992: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae and theLoganiaceae: congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? — Amer. J. Bot.79: 1171–1184.
—, 1995: Subfamilial and tribal relationships in theRubiaceae based onrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 383–397.
Caruel, T., 1873: Studi sulTheligonum cynocrambe. — Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital.5: 165–171.
Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.
Dahlgren, G., 1989: The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons. — InKit Tan, (Ed.): TheDavis andHedge Festschrift: Plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects, pp. 249–261. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
De Block, P., 1995: Ovary, seed and fruit ofRutidea (Rubiaceae, Pavetteae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.196: 1–17.
Eichler, A. W., 1878: Blüthendiagramme.2. — Leipzig: Engelmann.
Endress, P. K., 1994: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erbar, C., 1991: Sympetaly — a systematic character? — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.112: 417–451.
—, 1996: The formation of corolla tubes inRubiaceae and presumably related families. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 103–112.
Florence, J., 1986: Sertum polynesicum II.Rubiaceae nouvelles des îles Marquises (Polynésie Française). — Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia8: 3–11.
Igersheim, A., 1991: Palynological investigations ofPaederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae). — InPuff, C., (Ed.): The genusPaederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae): a multidisciplinary study. — Opera Bot. Belg.3: 135–149.
—, 1993: The character states of the Caribbean monotypic endemicStrumpfia (Rubiaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.13: 545–559.
Irmisch, T., 1856: Ein kleiner Beitrag zur Naturgeschichte desTheligonum cynocrambe L. — Flora39: 689–698.
Kapil, R., Mohana Rao, P., 1966: Embryology and systematic position ofTheligonum Linn. — Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. IndiaB32: 218–232.
Kirchoff, B., Rutishauser, R., 1990: The phyllotaxy ofCostus (Costaceae). — Bot. Gaz.151: 88–105.
Kooiman, P., 1971: Ein phytochemischer Beitrag zur Lösung des Verwandtschaftsproblems derTheligonaceae. — Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 395–398.
Loiseau, J.-E., 1969: La phyllotaxie. — Paris: Masson.
Mabry, T. J., Eifert, I. J., Chang, C., Mabry, H., Kidd, C., Behnke, H.-D., 1975:Theligonaceae: pigment and ultrastructural evidence which excludes it from the orderCentrospermae. — Biochem. Syst.3: 53–55.
Manen, J.-F., Natali, A., 1996: The chloroplastatpB-rbcL spacer inRubiaceae. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 51–57.
—, 1994: Phylogeny ofRubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 195–211.
Mendoza-Heuer, I., 1972: Dato para la determinación de especies en el géneroPhyllis (Rubiaceae). — Cuad. Bot. Canaria.14/15: 5–9.
—, 1977: Die Rubiaceen der Kanarischen Inseln. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.90: 211–217.
—, 1987: Makaronesische Endemiten: Zur Blütenbiologie vonPlocama pendula Ait. (Rubiaceae). — Bauhinia8: 235–241.
Natali, A., Manen, J. F., Ehrendorfer, F., 1995: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae-Rubioideae, in particular the tribeRubieae: evidence from a non-coding chloroplast DNA sequence. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 428–439.
—, 1996: Tribal, generic and specific relationships in theRubioideae-Rubieae (Rubiaceae) based on sequence data of a cpDNA intergene region. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 193–203.
Nicholas, A., Baijnath, H., 1994: A consensus classification for the orderGentianales with additional details on the suborderApocynineae. — Bot. Rev.60: 441–482.
Nowicke, J. W., Skvarla, J. J., 1979: Pollen morphology: the potential influence in higher order systematics. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.66: 633–700.
Piesschaert, F., 1995: Morfologie, anatomie en systematische positie vanDialypetalanthus. — Unpubl. Thesis, Koning. Universitet Leuven.
Pire, S. M., 1996: Palynological study of American species ofBorreria (Rubiaceae-Spermacoceae). — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 413–423.
Pötter, U., Klopfer, K., 1987: Untersuchungen zur Blatt- und Blütenentwicklung beiGalium aparine L. (Rubiaceae). — Flora179: 305–314.
Praglowski, J., 1973: The pollen morphology of theTheligonaceae with reference to taxonomy. — Pollen & Spores15: 385–396.
Puff, C., 1982: The delimitation of the tribeAnthospermeae and its affinities to thePaederieae (Rubiaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.84: 355–377.
—, 1986: A biosystematic study of the African and MadagascanRubiaceae-Anthospermeae. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.3: I-IX, 1–535.
Robbrecht, E., 1982: Pollen morphology of the tribesAnthospermeae andPaederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg.52: 349–366.
—, 1988: Tropical woodyRubiaceae. Characteristic features and progressions. Contributions to a new subfamilial classification. — Opera Bot. Belg.1: 1–271.
—, 1993: On the delimitation of theRubiaceae. — InRobbrecht, E., (Ed.): Advances inRubiaceae macrosystematics. — Opera Bot. Belg.6: 19–30.
—, 1991: The generaMitchella andDamnacanthus. Evidence for their close alliance; comments on the campylotropy in theRubiaceae and the circumscription of theMorindeae. — Blumea35: 307–345.
Ronse Decraene, L. P., Smets, E., 1995: The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.118: 193–247.
Rutishauser, R., 1981: Blattstellung und Sprossentwicklung bei Blütenpflanzen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nelkengewächse (Caryophyllaceen s. l.). — Diss. Bot.62: 1–127.
—, 1982: Der Plastochronquotient als Teil einer quantitativen Blattstellungsanalyse bei Samenpflanzen. — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen57: 323–357.
—, 1985: Blattquirle, Stipeln und Kolleteren bei denRubieae (Rubiaceae) im Vergleich mit anderen Angiospermen. — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen59: 375–424.
—, 1997: Plastochrone ratio and leaf arc as parameters of a quantitative phyllotaxis analysis in vascular plants. — InJean, R., Barabé, D., (Eds): Symmetry in plants. — Singapore: World Scientific Publishers (in press).
Schneider, H., 1914: Morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen anThelygonum cynocrambe L. — Flora106: 1–41.
Schoute, J. C., 1938: On whorled phyllotaxis. IV. Early binding whorls. — Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl.35: 415–558.
Schumann, K., 1891:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,IV 4, pp. 1–156. — Leipzig: Engelmann.
Sernander, R., 1906: Entwurf einer Monographie der europäischen Myrmekochoren. — Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.
Theisen, I., Barthlott, W., 1994: Micromorphologie der Epicuticularwachse und die Systematik derGentianales, Rubiales, Dipsacales undCalycerales. — Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt89. — Stuttgart: Steiner.
Thorne, R. F., 1992: An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. — Aliso13: 85–117.
Ulbrich, E., 1933: Über die GattungThelygonum Sauv. ex L. 1753. — Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem11: 889–902.
—, 1934:Thelygonaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,16c, pp. 368–378. — Leipzig: Engelmann.
Wunderlich, R., 1971: Die systematische Stellung vonTheligonum. — Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 329–394.
Yamazaki, T., 1993:Theligonaceae. — InIwatsuki, K., Yamazaki, T., Boufford, D. E., Ohba, H., (Eds): Flora of Japan,IIIa, p. 241. — Tokyo: Kodansha.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rutishauser, R., Decraene, L.P.R., Smets, E. et al. Theligonum cynocrambe: Developmental morphology of a peculiar rubiaceous herb. Pl Syst Evol 210, 1–24 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984724
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984724