Skip to main content
Log in

Theligonum cynocrambe: Developmental morphology of a peculiar rubiaceous herb

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The annual Mediterranean herbTheligonum cynocrambe shows a peculiar combination of morphological characters, e.g., switch from decussate to spiral phyllotaxis with 90–100° divergence, combined with a change from interpetiolar to lateral stipules, anemophily, lack of calyx, flowers often dimerous to trimerous, corolla fused in both male and female flowers, male flowers extra-axillary, with 2–19 stamens per flower, female flowers axillary, with inferior uniovulate ovary, basilateral style and perianth, nut-like fruits with elaiosome. In male flowers the androecium emerges as an (uneven) elliptical rim with a central depression. This common girdling primordium is divided up into several stamen primordia. In male flowers with low stamen number the stamen primordia may occupy the corners alternating with the corolla lobes. There are no epipetalous androecial primordia that secondarily divide into stamens. Male flowers occasionally show a hemispherical base that may be interpreted as remnant of the inferior ovary. In female flowers a ring primordium grows into a tube on which the petal lobes arise. The perianth and style become displaced adaxially by uneven growth of the inferior ovary. The ovary is basically bilocular. The lower region of the ovary is provided with a septum that is overtopped and hidden by the single curved ovule.Theligonum is referred to theRubiaceae-Rubioideae, with theAnthospermeae andPaederieae as most closely related tribes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balicka-Iwanowska, G., 1897: Die Morphologie desThelygonum cynocrambe. — Flora83: 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.-D., Mabry, T. J., (Eds), 1994:Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B., 1996: Phylogenetic studies withinRubiaceae and relationships to other families based on molecular data. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae and theLoganiaceae: congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? — Amer. J. Bot.79: 1171–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Subfamilial and tribal relationships in theRubiaceae based onrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruel, T., 1873: Studi sulTheligonum cynocrambe. — Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital.5: 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, G., 1989: The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons. — InKit Tan, (Ed.): TheDavis andHedge Festschrift: Plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects, pp. 249–261. — Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block, P., 1995: Ovary, seed and fruit ofRutidea (Rubiaceae, Pavetteae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.196: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A. W., 1878: Blüthendiagramme.2. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1994: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., 1991: Sympetaly — a systematic character? — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.112: 417–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: The formation of corolla tubes inRubiaceae and presumably related families. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florence, J., 1986: Sertum polynesicum II.Rubiaceae nouvelles des îles Marquises (Polynésie Française). — Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia8: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igersheim, A., 1991: Palynological investigations ofPaederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae). — InPuff, C., (Ed.): The genusPaederia L. (Rubiaceae-Paederieae): a multidisciplinary study. — Opera Bot. Belg.3: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: The character states of the Caribbean monotypic endemicStrumpfia (Rubiaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.13: 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmisch, T., 1856: Ein kleiner Beitrag zur Naturgeschichte desTheligonum cynocrambe L. — Flora39: 689–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapil, R., Mohana Rao, P., 1966: Embryology and systematic position ofTheligonum Linn. — Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. IndiaB32: 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchoff, B., Rutishauser, R., 1990: The phyllotaxy ofCostus (Costaceae). — Bot. Gaz.151: 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, P., 1971: Ein phytochemischer Beitrag zur Lösung des Verwandtschaftsproblems derTheligonaceae. — Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 395–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loiseau, J.-E., 1969: La phyllotaxie. — Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, T. J., Eifert, I. J., Chang, C., Mabry, H., Kidd, C., Behnke, H.-D., 1975:Theligonaceae: pigment and ultrastructural evidence which excludes it from the orderCentrospermae. — Biochem. Syst.3: 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manen, J.-F., Natali, A., 1996: The chloroplastatpB-rbcL spacer inRubiaceae. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Phylogeny ofRubiaceae-Rubieae inferred from the sequence of a cpDNA intergene region. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Heuer, I., 1972: Dato para la determinación de especies en el géneroPhyllis (Rubiaceae). — Cuad. Bot. Canaria.14/15: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Die Rubiaceen der Kanarischen Inseln. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.90: 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Makaronesische Endemiten: Zur Blütenbiologie vonPlocama pendula Ait. (Rubiaceae). — Bauhinia8: 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natali, A., Manen, J. F., Ehrendorfer, F., 1995: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae-Rubioideae, in particular the tribeRubieae: evidence from a non-coding chloroplast DNA sequence. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 428–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: Tribal, generic and specific relationships in theRubioideae-Rubieae (Rubiaceae) based on sequence data of a cpDNA intergene region. — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, A., Baijnath, H., 1994: A consensus classification for the orderGentianales with additional details on the suborderApocynineae. — Bot. Rev.60: 441–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicke, J. W., Skvarla, J. J., 1979: Pollen morphology: the potential influence in higher order systematics. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.66: 633–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piesschaert, F., 1995: Morfologie, anatomie en systematische positie vanDialypetalanthus. — Unpubl. Thesis, Koning. Universitet Leuven.

  • Pire, S. M., 1996: Palynological study of American species ofBorreria (Rubiaceae-Spermacoceae). — InRobbrecht, E., Puff, C., Smets, E., (Eds): Second InternationalRubiaceae Conference Proceedings. — Opera Bot. Belg.7: 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pötter, U., Klopfer, K., 1987: Untersuchungen zur Blatt- und Blütenentwicklung beiGalium aparine L. (Rubiaceae). — Flora179: 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praglowski, J., 1973: The pollen morphology of theTheligonaceae with reference to taxonomy. — Pollen & Spores15: 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puff, C., 1982: The delimitation of the tribeAnthospermeae and its affinities to thePaederieae (Rubiaceae). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.84: 355–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: A biosystematic study of the African and MadagascanRubiaceae-Anthospermeae. — Pl. Syst. Evol., Suppl.3: I-IX, 1–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbrecht, E., 1982: Pollen morphology of the tribesAnthospermeae andPaederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg.52: 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Tropical woodyRubiaceae. Characteristic features and progressions. Contributions to a new subfamilial classification. — Opera Bot. Belg.1: 1–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: On the delimitation of theRubiaceae. — InRobbrecht, E., (Ed.): Advances inRubiaceae macrosystematics. — Opera Bot. Belg.6: 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: The generaMitchella andDamnacanthus. Evidence for their close alliance; comments on the campylotropy in theRubiaceae and the circumscription of theMorindeae. — Blumea35: 307–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene, L. P., Smets, E., 1995: The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial character oligomery. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.118: 193–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutishauser, R., 1981: Blattstellung und Sprossentwicklung bei Blütenpflanzen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nelkengewächse (Caryophyllaceen s. l.). — Diss. Bot.62: 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Der Plastochronquotient als Teil einer quantitativen Blattstellungsanalyse bei Samenpflanzen. — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen57: 323–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Blattquirle, Stipeln und Kolleteren bei denRubieae (Rubiaceae) im Vergleich mit anderen Angiospermen. — Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen59: 375–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1997: Plastochrone ratio and leaf arc as parameters of a quantitative phyllotaxis analysis in vascular plants. — InJean, R., Barabé, D., (Eds): Symmetry in plants. — Singapore: World Scientific Publishers (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H., 1914: Morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen anThelygonum cynocrambe L. — Flora106: 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, J. C., 1938: On whorled phyllotaxis. IV. Early binding whorls. — Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl.35: 415–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K., 1891:Rubiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,IV 4, pp. 1–156. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sernander, R., 1906: Entwurf einer Monographie der europäischen Myrmekochoren. — Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theisen, I., Barthlott, W., 1994: Micromorphologie der Epicuticularwachse und die Systematik derGentianales, Rubiales, Dipsacales undCalycerales. — Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt89. — Stuttgart: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1992: An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. — Aliso13: 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich, E., 1933: Über die GattungThelygonum Sauv. ex L. 1753. — Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem11: 889–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1934:Thelygonaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,16c, pp. 368–378. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, R., 1971: Die systematische Stellung vonTheligonum. — Oesterr. Bot. Z.119: 329–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, T., 1993:Theligonaceae. — InIwatsuki, K., Yamazaki, T., Boufford, D. E., Ohba, H., (Eds): Flora of Japan,IIIa, p. 241. — Tokyo: Kodansha.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rutishauser, R., Decraene, L.P.R., Smets, E. et al. Theligonum cynocrambe: Developmental morphology of a peculiar rubiaceous herb. Pl Syst Evol 210, 1–24 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984724

Key words

Navigation