Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J. L.: 1956, ‘Ifs and Cans’,Proceedings of the British Academy 1956, pp. 109–32, reprinted in Austin (1961).

  • Austin, J. L.: 1961,Philosophical Papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, F. and P. Coopmans: 1989, ‘A Government-Binding Perspective on the Imperative in English’,Journal of Linguistics 25, 417–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, D.: 1987,Semantic Constraints on Relevance, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1967, ‘The Imperative in English’, inTo Honour Roman Jakobson Mouton, The Hague, revised version in Bolinger (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1977,Meaning and Form, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R.: 1988, ‘Explicature, Implicature and Truth-Theoretic Semantics’, in Kempson (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.: 1991, ‘Relevance Theory and the Semantics of Non-Declaratives’, Ph.D. Thesis, University College London.

  • Clark, B.: forthcoming, ‘An Analysis of Let and Let's’, to appear inLingua.

  • Cole, P. and J. L. Morgan (eds.): 1975,Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, J., J. Moravczik and C. Taylor (eds.): 1988,Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, Stanford University Press, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. and G. Harman (eds.): 1972,Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, E. E.: 1986,The English Imperative, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. J. and D. T. Langendoen (eds.): 1971,Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1983,The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B.: 1969, ‘An Analysis of Concessive Conditionals’,Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago.

  • Fraser, B.: 1971, ‘An Analysis of “Even” in English’, in Fillmore and Langendoen (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, M. and A. Zwicky: 1971, ‘On Invited Inferences’,Linguistic Inquiry 2, 561–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G.: 1975, ‘How To Get People To Do Things with Words: The Whimperative Question’, in Cole and Morgan (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, M.: 1984, ‘The Semantics of English Imperatives’,Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 103–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itani-Kaufmann, R.: forthcoming, ‘Explicature and Explicit Attitude’, Ph.D. Thesis, University College London.

  • Kempson, R. (ed.): 1988,Mental Representation: The Interface Between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in Davidson and Harman (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1966, ‘Stative Adjectives and Verbs in English’,MLAT Report No.NSF-17 Harvard University Computation Laboratory, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. M.: 1975, ‘Elliptical Conditionals and/or Hyperbolic Imperatives: Some Remarks on the Inherent Inadequacy of Derivations’,Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.

  • Lewis, D.: 1983,Philosophical Papers Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. H. Thomason (ed.), Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, J. M.: 1970, ‘Whimperatives’, in Sadock and Vanck (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, J. M. and A. L. Vanek: 1970,Studies Presented to R. B. Lees by his Students, Linguistic Research Inc., Edmonton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmerling, S. F.: 1980, ‘On the Syntax and Semantics of English Imperatives’, unpublished m.s., The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Schmerling, S.: 1982, ‘How Imperatives Are Special, And How They Aren't’,Chicago Linguistics Society Parasession on Non-Declaratives, University of Chicago.

  • Searle, J. R.: 1979,Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1984: ‘Speech Acts and Propositional Attitudes’, unpublished draft ms of Sperber and Wilson (1986), University College London.

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1985, ‘Loose Talk’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86, 153–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986,Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1988a, ‘Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences’, in Dancy, Moravczik and Taylor (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1988b, ‘Representation and Relevance’, in Kempson (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English Goldsmiths' College, University of London, SE 14 6NW, London, UK

    Billy Clark

Authors
  1. Billy Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, B. Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”. Linguist Philos 16, 79–121 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984723

Keywords

Search

Navigation