Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Androecial development and systematics inFlacourtiaceae s. l.

Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Androecial development of 13 species belonging to six tribes ofFlacourtiaceae has been investigated. While inScolopieae andFlacourtieae the stamens develop centrifugally, inErythrospermeae, Oncobeae andPangieae they are initiated in a centripetal sequence or a sequence that is neither distinctly centripetal nor centrifugal. The distribution of these developmental patterns coincides with the distribution of other characters (e.g. cyanogenic compounds, salicoid leaf teeth) and therefore supports a split of the family intoFlacourtiaceae s. str. (containing theScolopieae, Homalieae, Prockieae, Flacourtieae, Casearieae andBembicieae) andKiggelariaceae (withErythrospermeae, Oncobeae andPangieae) and is in accordance with results of recentrbcL studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chase, M. W., Lledo, M. D., Crespo, M. B., Swensen, S. M., 1996: When in doubt, put it in theFlacourtiaceae: molecular systematics ofFlacourtiaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.83 (6, Suppl.): 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,Learn, G. H. Jr.,Barrett, S. C. H., Graham, S., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid generbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, E., Litt, A., Sytsma, K., 1996: Circumscription ofMyrtales and their relationships to other rosids: Evidence fromrbcL sequence data. — Amer. J. Bot.83: 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1946: Centrifugal stamens. — J. Arnold Arbor.27: 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1976: The seeds of dicotyledons. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1957: Outline of a new system of families and orders of dicotyledons. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg.27: 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. 2nd edn. — Bronx: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, W. J. J. O., 1974: The genera of tribePassifloreae (Passifloraceae), with special reference to flower morphology. — Blumea22: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1976: Die Androeciumanlage bei polyandrischen Hamamelidaceen und ihre systematische Bedeutung. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.97: 436–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1996: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. 2nd edn. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1975: Zur Androeciumanlage und Antherenentwicklung beiCaloncoba echinata (Flacourtiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.123: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., 1952: Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. — Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, E., 1925:Flacourtiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn,21, pp. 377–457. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golysheva, M. D., 1975: Leaf anatomy ofIdesia polycarpa Maxim. and otherFlacourtiaceae in connection with the problem of affinitive interrelations between the familiesSalicaceae andFlacourtiaceae. — Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad)60: 787–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1908: ÜberJuliania, eine Terebinthaceen-Gattung mit Cupula, und die wahren Stammeltern der Kätzchenblütler. — Beih. Bot. Centralbl., Abt. II,23: 81–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J., Wolfe, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Vegetative morphology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 538–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H., 1991: Angiospermen. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufford, L., 1990: Androecial development and the problem of monophyly ofLoasaceae. — Canad. J. Bot.68: 402–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hul, S., Breteler, F. J., 1997: Réductions génériques dans lesOncobeae (Flacourtiaceae). — Adansonia19: 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1967: The genera of flowering plants. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, R. B., 1995: Reproductive structure and organogenesis in a cottonwood,Populus deltoides (Salicaceae). — Int. J. Pl. Sci.156: 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, R. C., 1973: Pollen morphology of theFlacourtiaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.60: 273–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., 1988: Das zentripetale Androeceum vonPunica. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.109: 555–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973: Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Loasaceen-Blüten. — Oesterr. Bot. Z.122: 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, D. E., 1988: A synopsis ofFlacourtiaceae. — Aliso12: 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, B., 1969: Ontogenetische Studien anMyrtales-Blüten. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.89: 210–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J., 1975: Taxonomic relationships ofSalicaceae andFlacourtiaceae: their bearing on interpretative floral morphology and dilleniid phylogeny. — Acta. Bot. Neerl.24: 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H., 1964:Violales. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12th edn, pp. 322–340. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, R. D., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the dicotyledons. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B., 1975: Systematic anatomy of the xylem and comments on the relationship ofFlacourtiaceae. — J. Arnold Arbor.56: 20–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, O., Chase, M. W., Endress, P. K., 1998: A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms usingrbcL and non-molecular data sets. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.85: 137–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene, L. P., Smets, E. F., 1992: Complex polyandry in theMagnoliatae: definition, distribution and systematic value. — Nordic J. Bot.12: 621–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, K. C., Seigler, D. S., 1985: Cyanogenic glycosides and the systematics of theFlacourtiaceae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.13: 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants. — Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1997: Diversity and classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1992: An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. — Aliso13: 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heel, W. A., 1977: Flowers and fruits inFlacourtiaceae III. SomeOncobeae. — Blumea23: 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1979: Flowers and fruits inFlacourtiaceae IV.Hydnocarpus spp., Kiggelaria africana L.,Casearia spp., Berberidopsis corallina Hook. f. — Blumea25: 513–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, O., 1894:Flacourtiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,3/6a: 1–56. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zürich, Switzerland

    Alex Bernhard & Peter K. Endress

Authors
  1. Alex Bernhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter K. Endress
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhard, A., Endress, P.K. Androecial development and systematics inFlacourtiaceae s. l.. Pl Syst Evol 215, 141–155 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984652

Key words

search

Navigation