Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 148, Issue 1–2, pp 103–117 | Cite as

Spiniferomonas septispina andS. enigmata, two new algal species confusing the distinction betweenSpiniferomonas andChrysosphaerella (Chrysophyceae)

  • K. H. Nicholls
Article

Abstract

Two new species of non-colonial silica-scaled chrysophytes were discovered in Ontario and were assigned to the genusSpiniferomonas (Chrysophyceae) owing to their solitary cell habit. Scale structure in the two new species is distinctive but includes features common to bothSpiniferomonas andChrysosphaerella. The use of scale structure as the main diagnostic feature to distinguish the two genera is no longer acceptable. A more expedient separation of the two genera based on cell habit (solitary vs. colonial) is proposed and includes the transfer ofChrysospharella salinaBirch-Andersen andChrysosphaerella coronacircumspinaWujek & Kristiansen to the genusSpiniferomonas as new combinations. The proposed revision is consistent with existing generic circumscriptions of other ochromonadalean forms with either solitary or colonial cell habit.

Key words

Algae Chrysophyceae Spiniferomonas septispina sp. n. S. enigmata sp. n. Chrysosphaerella Morphology taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asmund, B., Kristiansen, J., 1984: The genusMallomonas (Chrysophyceae). — Opera Marina (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Balanov, I. M., 1980: On the new species of the genusChrysosphaerella (Chrysophyta). — Bot. Z. H.65, 1190–1191.Google Scholar
  3. Birch-Andersen, P., 1973:Chrysosphaerella salina. A new species of theChrysophyceae from salt marsh pools. — Bot. Tidsskr.68, 140–144.Google Scholar
  4. Billard, C., 1983:Prymnesium zebrinum sp. nov. etP. annuliferum sp. nov., deux nouvelles espèces apparentées àP. parvum Carter (Prymnesiophyceae). — Phycologia22, 141–151.Google Scholar
  5. Cronberg, G., Kristiansen, J., 1980:Synuraceae and otherChrysophyceae from central Småland, Sweden. — Bot. Not.133, 595–618.Google Scholar
  6. Green, J. C., Hibberd, D. J., Pienaar, R. N., 1982: The taxonomy ofPrymnesium (Prymnesiophyceae) including a description of a new cosmopolitan species,P. patellifera sp. nov., and further observations onP. parvum N. Carter. — Br. Phycol. J.17, 363–382.Google Scholar
  7. Kristiansen, J., 1978: Studies on theChrysophyceae of Bornholm. II. — Bot. Tidsskr.73, 71–85.Google Scholar
  8. —, 1980:Chrysophyceae from some Greek lakes. — Nova Hedwigia33, 167–194.Google Scholar
  9. Manton, I., Oates, K., 1980:Polycrater galapagensis gen. et sp. nov., a putative coccolithophorid from the Galapagos Islands with an unusual aragonitic periplast. — Br. Phycol. J.15, 95–103.Google Scholar
  10. —, 1981: Cylinder-scales in marine flagellates from the genusChrysochromulina (Haptophyceae = Prymnesiophyceae): Further observations fromC. microcylindra Leadbeater andC. cyathophora Thomsen. — J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K.61, 27–33.Google Scholar
  11. Moestrup, O., 1979: Identification by electron microscopy of marine nanoplankton from New Zealand including the description of four new species. — New Zeal. J. Bot.17, 61–95.Google Scholar
  12. Nicholls, K. H., 1980: A reassessment ofChrysosphaerella longispina andC. multispina, and a revised key to related genera in theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.135, 95–106.Google Scholar
  13. —, 1981:Spiniferomonas (Chrysophyceae) in Ontario lakes including a revision and descriptions of two new species. — Can. J. Bot.59, 107–117.Google Scholar
  14. - 1984: The validity of the genusSpiniferomonas Takahashi (Chrysophyceae). — Nord. J. Bot. (accepted).Google Scholar
  15. Preisig, H. R., Takahashi, E., 1978:Chrysosphaerella (Pseudochrysosphaerella)solitaria, spec. nova (Chrysophyceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.129, 135–142.Google Scholar
  16. —, 1982a: Ultrastructure and taxonomy ofParaphysomonas (Chrysophyceae) and related genera 1. — Nord. J. Bot.2, 397–420.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1982b: Ultrastructure and taxonomy ofParaphysomonas (Chrysophyceae) and related genera 2. — Nord. J. Bot.2, 601–638.Google Scholar
  18. Skogstad, A., 1982:Synuraceae-Floraen I 27 Lokaliteter I Oslo-Omradet, En Lysmikroskopisk Og Elektronmikroskopisk Undersokelse. — Univ. Oslo: Inst. Mar. Biol. Limnol., 128 pp., English Summary.Google Scholar
  19. Takahashi, E., 1973: Studies on generaMallomonas andSynura, and other plankton in freshwater with the electron microscope VII. New genusSpiniferomonas of theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae). — Bot. Mag. Tokyo86, 75–88.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1978: Electron microscopical studies of theSynuraceae (Chrysophyceae) in Japan; taxonomy and ecology. — Tokyo: Tokai University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Thomsen, H. A., 1979: Electron microscopical observations on brackish-water nannoplankton from the Tvärminne area, SW coast of Finland. — Acta Bot. Fennica110, 11–37.Google Scholar
  22. —, 1980a:Quaternariella obscura gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. — Phycologia19, 260–265.Google Scholar
  23. —, 1980b: Two species ofTrigonaspis gen. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. — Phycologia19, 218–229.Google Scholar
  24. Wujek, D. E., Hamilton, R., Wee, J., 1975: Studies on MichiganChrysophyceae. III. — Mich. Bot.14, 91–94.Google Scholar
  25. —, 1977: Studies on MichiganChrysophyceae. IV. — Mich. Bot.16, 191–194.Google Scholar
  26. —, 1983:Chrysodidymus in the United States. — Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc.102, 77–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Nicholls
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory Services and Applied Research BranchOntario Ministry of the EnvironmentRexdaleCanada

Personalised recommendations