Skip to main content
Log in

Sex pheromone of fall armyworm

Laboratory evaluation of male response and inhibition of mating by pheromone components

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two components of the fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), sex pheromone, (Z)-9-dodecen-1-ol acetate (DDA) and (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol (TDA), were tested alone and in combination to determine their effects on male sexual response and inhibition of mating in the laboratory. The threshold response for FAW males was lower for TDA than for DDA, and males responded to TDA over a wider range of dosages. Although TDA is not attractive to FAW males in the field, this compound was highly effective in reducing mating under laboratory conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burton, R.L. 1970. A low-cost artificial diet for the corn earworm.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1969–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.L., andSparks, A.N. 1979. (Z)-9-Tetradecen-1-ol acetate: A secondary sex pheromone of the fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith).J. Chem. Ecol. 5:721–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J.R., Mitchell, E.R., andCross, J.H. 1981. Field and laboratory evaluation of mating disruptants ofHeliothis zea andSpodoptera frugiperda in Florida, pp. 243–251,in Everett R. Mitchell (ed.). Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals: Concepts and Practice. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E.R., andDoolittle, R.E. 1976. Sex pheromonesofSpodopteraexigua, S. eridania, andS. frugiperda: Bioassay for field activity.J. Econ. Entomol. 69:324–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, E.R., andMcLaughlin, J.R. 1981. Suppression of mating and oviposition by fall armyworm and mating by corn earworm in corn using the air permeation technique.J. Econ. Entomol. In press.

  • Mitchell, E.R., Copeland, W.W., Sparks, A.N., andSekul, A.A. 1974. Fall armyworm: Disruption of pheromone communication with synthetic acetates.Environ. Entomol. 3:779–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekul, A.A., andCox, C.C. 1967. Response of males to the sex pheromones of the fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): A laboratory evaluation.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60:691–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekul, A.A., andSparks, A.N. 1967. Sex pheromone of the fall armyworm moth: Isolation, identification, and synthesis.J. Econ. Entomol. 60:1270–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekul, A.A., andSparks, A.N. 1976. Sex attractant of the fall armyworm moth.USDA Tech. Bull. 1542, 6 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

cooperating with the Insect Attractants, Behavior, and Basic Biology Research Laboratory, Gainesville, Florida 32604.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirai, Y., Mitchell, E.R. Sex pheromone of fall armyworm. J Chem Ecol 8, 267–273 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984022

Key words

Navigation