Abstract
A comparative analysis is presented of absolute interference methods of measuring the lengths of end gages. Significant advantages are shown for the two-sided method, which permits the accuracy of length measurement to be raised, and the process to be fully automated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Recommendation MOZM No. 30.
L. F. Khavinson, Metrology and Raising the Quality of Products Manufactured by Leningrad Plants [in Russian], LDNTP, Leningrad (1981).
M. Dumke and W. Fischer, PTB-Mitt, No. 76, 519 (1966).
V. A. Solov'ev, Izmer. Tekh., No. 4, 1 (1960).
Tsumura Kiion and Fudsii Yasuharu, Seimitsu Kikai, No. 37(11), 783 (1971).
Tsumura Kiion and Fudsii Yasuharu, Seimitsu Kikai, No. 37(12), 849 (1971).
Tsumura Kiion and Fudsii Yasuharu, Seimitsu Kikai, No. 38(2), 155 (1972).
Kato Takashi, Keiri Kanri, No. 4, 23 (1975).
H. Bohme, PTB-Janresbericht, 182 (1973).
Kato Kei, Seimitsu Kikai, No. 39(4), 115, 152 (1973).
Kato Takashi, Keire Kenkyuse Khokoku, No. 22(3), 152 (1973).
M. Dumke, Fachberichte fur Oberflachentechnik, No. 7, 224 (1969).
H. Bohme and G. Bonsch, PTB-Janresbericht, 121 (1972).
K. Dorenwedt, Optik, No. 35(1), 9 (1972).
E. G. Twaite, Metrologia, No. 14(2), 53 (1978).
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 8, pp. 25–26, August, 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khavinson, V.M. Absolute methods of measuring the lengths of end gages. Meas Tech 36, 879–880 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983983