Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation and equation models of insect population control by pheromone-baited traps

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A spatial-temporal model for personal computers is developed that simulates trapping of an insect population based on trap and population parameters that can be varied independently. The model allows individual “insects” to move forward at any step size with right or left turns within any specified angle taken at random. Thex andy axes of the area within which insects move can be varied as well as the number of insects, their flight speed, and the duration of the control period. In addition, the number of pheromonebaited traps, their placement in a grid or at random (with a variable degree of spacing), and their effective catch radius (proportional to pheromone release rate) can also be varied. Simulations showed that catch was similar regardless of whether traps were placed in a grid or practically at random (random placement but no traps were allowed to overlap in their effective catch radii). Iterative equations were developed for computer that can rapidly obtain values that correspond to the mean results from the slower simulation model. Based on a set of input parameters, the equations determine the percentage of the population that should be caught during a specified time, the time required to catch a specified proportion of the insects, and the number of traps necessary to catch the population proportion in the time period. The effects of varying the number of insects, flight speed, trap radius, and number of traps on the percent control or time to catch all insects are presented. Population control of the bark beetleIps typographus was simulated using realistic pheromone trap and population parameters. A discussion of insect and bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) population control using pheromone traps is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austarå, O., Annila, E., Bejer, B., andEhnström, B. 1984. Insect pests in forests of the Nordic countries 1977–1981.Fauna Norv. Ser. B. 31:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T.C. 1986. Pheromone-modulated movements of flying moths, pp. 39–48,in T.L. Payne, C.E. Kennedy, and M.C. Birch (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, A. 1985. Methods and effects of suppressing bark beetle populations, pp. 169–174,in L. Safranyik (ed.). The Role of the Host in the Population Dynamics of Forest Insects. Proceedings. IUFRO conference Banff Centre 1983. (Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria, B.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, A. 1988. Potential use of semiochemicals for integrated control of bark beetles in Europe, pp. 257–261,in T.L. Payne, and H. Saarenmaa (eds.). Integrated Control of Scolytid Bark Beetles. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, A. 1989. The recentIps typographus outbreak in Norway: Experiences from a control program.Holarct. Ecol. 12:515–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakke, A., Frøyen, P., andSkattebøl, L. 1977. Field response to a new pheromonal compound isolated fromIps typographus.Naturwissenschaften 64:98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, H.J. 1984. Pheromone trapping models for pest control: Effects of mating patterns and immigration.Res. Popul. Ecol. 26:303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, H.J. 1988. Models for combining methods of pest control: Food-baited and pheromonebaited traps containing either insecticide or chemosterilant.Bull. Entomol. Res. 78:573–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, H.J., andLi, C. 1991. Combining methods of pest control: Minimizing cost during the control program.Theor. Popul. Biol. 40:105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard, W.D., Tilden, P.E., Wood, D.L., Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., andRodin, J.O. 1969. Western pine beetle: Field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene.Science 164:1284–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard, W.D.,Wood, D.L., andTilden, P.E. 1979. Using behavior modifying chemicals to reduce western pine beetle-caused tree mortality and protect trees, pp. 159–163,in W.E. Waters, (ed.). Current Topics in Forest Entomology. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report WO-8.

  • Beroza, M., andKnipling, E.F. 1972. Gypsy moth control with the sex attractant pheromone.Science 177:19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A.A., andStenseth, N.C. 1989. A theoretical basis for understanding and managing biological populations with particular reference to the spruce bark beetle.Holarct Ecol. 12:387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A.A., Raffa, K.F., Millstein, J.A., andStenseth, N.C. 1989. Interaction dynamics of bark beetle aggregation and conifer defense rates.Oikos 56:256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birgersson, G., andBergström, G. 1989. Volatiles released from individual spruce bark beetle entrance holes: Quantitative variations during the first week of attack.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:2465–2483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, L.E. 1978. A trapping system for the western pine beetle using attractive pheromones.J. Chem. Ecol. 4:261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, L.E., Wood, D.L., Bedard, W.D., Silverstein, R.M., andWest, J.R. 1979. Quantitative estimates of the western pine beetle attractive pheromone components, exo-brevicomin, frontalin, and myrcene in nature.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1984. Nearest neighbor analysis and simulation of distribution patterns indicates an attack spacing mechanism in the bark beetle,Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Environ. Entomol. 13:1191–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1987. Interactions of pheromone component odor plumes of western pine beetle.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2143–2157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1989. Chemical ecology of bark beetles.Experientia 45:271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1991. Simulation of mate-finding behaviour in pine shoot beetles,Tomicus piniperda.Anim. Behav. 41:649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A. 1992. Dirichlet tessellation of bark beetle spatial attack points.J. Anim. Ecol. 61:759–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A., Anderbrant, O., andLöfqvist, J. 1989. Effective attraction radius: A method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:749–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A., Birgersson, G., Löfqvist, J., Appelgren, M., andBergström, G. 1990a. Isolation of pheromone synergists of bark beetle,Pityogenes chalcographus, from complex insect-plant odors by fractionation and subtractive-combination bioassay.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:861–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.A., Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G., andFrancke, W. 1990b. E-Myrcenol inIps duplicatus: An aggregation pheromone component new for bark beetles.Experientia 46:1209–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, D.G., Critchley, B.R., andMcVeigh, L.J. 1989. Mating disruption, pp. 89–119,in A.R. Jutsum and R.F.S. Gordon (eds.). Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection, Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMars, C.J., Slaughter, G.W., Bedard, W.D., Norick, N.X., andRoettgering, B. 1980. Estimating western pine beetle-caused tree mortality for evaluating an attractive pheromone treatment.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:853–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J.W., Löfstedt, C., andLöfqvist, J. 1987. Repeatability of pheromone emissions from individual female ermine mothsYponomeuta padellus andYponomeuta rorellus.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1431–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkinton, J.S., andCardé, R.T. 1984. Odor dispersion in chemical ecology of insects, pp. 73–91,in W.J. Bell and R.T. Cardé (eds.) Chapman and Hall, Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M.E., Van Den Driessche, P., andBarclay, H.J. 1985. A density dependent model of pheromone trapping.Theor. Popul. Biol. 27:91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, H.M., andMerkle, J.R. 1984. Studies on disruption of sexual communication in the pink bollworm,Pectinophora gossypiella, (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae) with micro encapsulated gossyplure or its componentZ, Z isomer.Bull. Entomol. Res. 74:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniotakis, G., Kozyrakis, M., Fitsakis, T., andAntonidaki, A. 1991. An effective mass trapping method for the control ofDacus oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 84:564–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, R.J., Benton, F.P., Hall, D.R., andDos, S.S.R. 1984. Control ofEphestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) by synthetic sex pheromones in the laboratory and store.J. Stored Prod. Res. 20:191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O.T.,Lisk, J.C.,Howse, P.E.,Baker, R.,Bueno, A.M., andRamos, P. 1982. Mating disruption of the olive fruit flyDacus oleae with the major component of its sex pheromone, pp. 500–505,in R. Cavalloro (ed.). Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC International Symposium, Athens, Greece.

  • Kinzer, G.W., Fentiman, A.F., Jr., Page, T.F., Foltz, R.L., Vité, J.P., andPitman, G.B. 1969. Bark beetle attractants: Identification, synthesis and field bioassay of a new compound isolated fromDendroctonus.Nature 211:475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knipling, E.F., andMcGuire, J.U., Jr. 1966. Population models to test theoretical effects of sex attractants used for insect control.U.S. Dep. Agric. Inform. Bull. 308:2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K. 1982. Competition between females and pheromone traps: Time lag between female mating activity and male trap captures.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17:292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji, F., andFujita, K. 1980. A population model to assess the effect of sex pheromones on population suppression.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 15:27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, S.B., andCardé, R.T. 1984. Rate of release of spruce budwormChoristoneura fumiferana pheromone from virgin females and synthetic lures.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raulston, J.R., Lingren, P.D., Sparks, A.N., andMartin, D.F. 1979. Mating interaction between native tobacco budworms and released backcross adults.Environ. Entomol. 8:349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D. 1991. Control of bark beetles in the five new states of the Federal Republic of Germany, pp. 28–36,in A. Wulf and R. Kehr (eds.). Bark Beetle Hazards following Storm Damage: Possibilities and Limits of Integrated Control. Colloquium, Braunschweig, Germany. Communications from the Federal Biological Institute for Agriculture and Forestry, Berlin-Dahlem, No. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, W.L., Glass, E.H., Tette, J., andComeau, A. 1970. Sex pheromone trapping for redbanded leaf roller control: Theoretical and actual.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1162–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlyter, F. 1992. Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: Estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems.J. Appl. Entomol. 114:439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlyter, F., Birgersson, G., Byers, J.A., Löfqvist, J., andBergström, G. 1987. Field response of spruce bark beetle,Ips typographus, to aggregation pheromone candidates.J. Chem. Ecol. 13:701–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R.M. 1981. Pheromones: Background and potential for use in insect pest control.Science 213:1326–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., Bellas, T.E., Wood, D.L., andBrowne, L.E. 1968. Brevicomin: Principal sex attractant in the frass of the female western pine beetle.Science 159:889–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternlicht, M., Barzakay, I., andTamim, M. 1990. Management ofPrays citri in lemon orchards by mass trapping of males.Entomol, Exp. Appl. 55:59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavaso, E.J. 1982. Boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis, isolated field plot studies of disruption of pheromone communication.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 17:347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villavaso, E.J., andMcGovern, W.L. 1981. Boll weevil,Anthonomus grandis grandis, disruption of pheromonal communication in the laboratory and small field plots.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 16:306–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P. 1989. The European struggle to controlIps typographus: Past present and future.Holarct. Ecol. 12:520–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrkoc, J. 1989. Use of insect pheromone in integrated pest management examples from Czechoslovakia.Chem. Scr. 29:407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. 1987. Can bark beetles be controlled efficiently by application of pheromone traps.Allg. Forstz. 42:87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, J.A., Lopez, J.D., Jr., andLatheef, M.A. 1992. Field density estimates ofHeliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from catches in sex pheromone-baited traps.Bull. Entomol. Res. 82:281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.L. 1980. Approach to research and forest management for western pine beetle control, pp. 417–448,in C.B. Huffaker (ed.). New Technology of Pest Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worner, S.P. 1991. Use of models in applied entomology: The need for perspective.Environ. Entomol. 20:768–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvirgzdins, A., Lingren, P.D., Henneberry, T.J., Nowell, C.E., andGillespie, J.M. 1984. Mating disruption of a wild population of tobacco budworm,Heliothis virescens, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with virelure.J. Econ. Entomol. 77:1464–1469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byers, J.A. Simulation and equation models of insect population control by pheromone-baited traps. J Chem Ecol 19, 1939–1956 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983798

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983798

Key Words

Navigation