Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic variability in two hydrophilous species ofPotamogeton, P. pectinatus andP. filiformis (Potamogetonaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic variability inPotamogeton pectinatus andP. filiformis was studied by means of isozymes. The overall levels of variability were similar to some other well studied hydrophilous species, and were shown to be distributed more between than within populations. This partitioning of variability was attributed to three main factors. (1) Clonal growth (as measured by the frequency of multi-enzyme phenotypes) was shown to be a major factor in both species, although more important inP. pectinatus. (2) Low levels of sexual reproduction were shown to be a likely contributor to the partitioning of variability inP. pectinatus; such reproduction is probably limited by seedling recruitment rather than by infrequent flowering. (3) Geographical isolation was indicated as a factor regulating gene flow at distances of more than about 1000 km in both species, with the data suggesting that dispersal between populations is mainly by seed rather than by vegetative means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, S. C. H., Eckert, C. G., Husband, B. C., 1993: Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant populations. — Aquatic Bot.44: 105–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand, N. C., Roose, M. L., 1987: Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fager, E. W., 1972: Diversity: a sampling study. — Amer. Naturalist106: 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1981: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — InReinhold, L. & al., (Eds): Progress in phytochemistry7: 1–46. — Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. B., 1993: The adaptive significance of clonal reproduction in the angiosperms — an aquatic perspective. — Aquatic Bot.44: 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. H., Cook, C. D. K., 1989: Pollination efficiency ofPotamogeton pectinatus L. — Aquatic Bot.34: 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagström, J. O., 1916: Critical researches on the Potamogetons. — Kongl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl.55(5: 1–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., 1990: Allozyme diversity in plant species. — InBrown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., Weir, B. S., (Eds): Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, pp. 43–64. — Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P. W., 1975: Genetic similarity and distance: comments and comparisons. — Evolution29: 362–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettiarachchi, P., Triest, L., 1986: Isozyme polymorphism ofPotamogeton pectinatus L. — Proceedings of the 7th symposium on aquatic weeds, pp. 163–168.

  • Hettiarachchi, P., Triest, L., 1991: Isozyme polymorphism in the genusPotamogeton (Potamogetonaceae). — Opera Bot. Belg.4: 87–114. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, P. M., 1995: Chromosome numbers. — InPreston, C. D.: Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland, pp. 55–58. — London: B.S.B.I.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995a: Genetic variability in British populations ofPotamogeton coloratus (Potamogetonaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.197: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995b: Isozyme evidence for hybridization betweenPotamogeton natans andP. nodosus (Potamogetonaceae) in Britain. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.117: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, P. M., Preston, C. D., Gornall, R. J., 1996: Isozyme evidence for the parentage and multiple origins ofPotamogeton ×suecicus (P. pectinatus ×P. filiformis, Potamogetonaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.202: 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, E., Fries, M., 1986: Atlas of north European vascular plants north of the tropic of Cancer.1–3. — Königstein: Koeltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1975: A treatise on limnology.3. Limnological botany. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkman, L., van Wijk, R. J., 1984: On the variation in chromosome number inPotamogeton pectinatus L. — Aquatic Bot.20: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laushman, R. H., 1993: Population genetics of hydrophilous angiosperms. — Aquatic Bot.44: 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les, D. H., 1986: The evolution of achene morphology inCeratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae). I. Fruit-spine variation and relationships ofC. demersum, C. submersum andC. apiculatum. — Syst. Bot.11: 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Breeding systems, population structure and evolution in hydrophilous angiosperms. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 819–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: Genetic diversity in the monoecious hydrophileCeratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1070–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., 1994: Multivariate statistical methods. A primer. 2nd edn. — London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, C., 1991: Isozyme patterning in marine spermatophytes. — Opera Bot. Belgica4: 193–200. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. D., 1979: Ecological implications of clonal diversity in parthenogenetic morphospecies. — Amer. Zoologist19: 753–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R., 1974: The measurement of species diversity. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.5: 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C., 1969: An introduction to mathematical ecology. — New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, A. H., Murphy, K. J., 1990: Aquatic weeds. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, C. D., 1995: Pondweeds of Great Britain and Ireland. — London: B.S.B.I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D., 1967: The biology of aquatic vascular plants. — London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical taxonomy, 2nd edn. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorsa, P., 1988: Pollen morphology ofPotamogeton andGroenlandia (Potamogetonaceae) and its taxonomic significance. — Ann. Bot. Fenn.25: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A., Pearman, D. A., Preston, C. D., (Eds), 1994: Scarce plants in Britain. — Peterborough: J.N.C.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triest, L., (Ed.), 1991a: Isozymes in water plants. — Opera Bot. Belg.4. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991b: Isozymes inLagarosiphon (Hydrocharitaceae) populations from South Africa: the situation in dioecious, but mainly vegetatively propagating weeds. — Opera Bot. Belgica4: 71–85. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991c: Enzyme polymorphism and its relationships to biological features in aquatic plants (including a comparison with terrestrial plants). — Opera Bot. Belgica4: 201–240. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: Isozymes in European and MediterraneanZannichellia (Zannichelliaceae) populations: a situation of predominant inbreeders. — Opera Bot. Belgica4: 133–166. — Meise: National Botanic Garden of Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tur, N. M., 1982: Revisión del géneroPotamogeton L. en la Argentina. — Darwinia24: 217–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Bijl, L., Sand-Jensen, K., Hjermind, A. L., 1989: Photosynthesis and canopy structure of a submerged plant,Potamogeton pectinatus, in a Danish lowland stream. — J. Ecol.77: 947–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, R. J., 1988: Ecological studies onPotamogeton pectinatus L. I. General characteristics, biomass production and life cycles under field conditions. — Aquatic Bot.31: 211–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989a: Ecological studies onPotamogeton pectinatus L. III. Reproductive strategies and germination ecology. — Aquatic Bot.33: 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Ecological studies onPotamogeton pectinatus L. II. Autecological characteristics, with emphasis on salt tolerance, intraspecific variation and isoenzyme patterns. — Aquatic Bot.32: 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J. F., Weeden, N. F., 1989: Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 46–72. — Portland: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb, G., 1988: Notes on pondweeds — outlines for a monographical treatment of the genusPotamogeton L. — Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg.99: 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Environmental & Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Glasgow, UK

    P. M. Hollingsworth

  2. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, PE17 2LS, Huntingdon, UK

    C. D. Preston

  3. Botany Department, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, Leicester, UK

    R. J. Gornall

Authors
  1. P. M. Hollingsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. D. Preston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. J. Gornall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollingsworth, P.M., Preston, C.D. & Gornall, R.J. Genetic variability in two hydrophilous species ofPotamogeton, P. pectinatus andP. filiformis (Potamogetonaceae). Pl Syst Evol 202, 233–254 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983385

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983385

Key words

Search

Navigation