Skip to main content
Log in

The familial and subfamilial relationships ofApocynaceae andAsclepiadaceae evaluated withrbcL data

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequence data for therbcL gene from twenty-four taxa of the familiesApocynaceae andAsclepiadaceae were cladistically analysed in order to evaluate the existing familial and subfamilial classification. The taxa sampled represent all described subfamilies and a majority of the described tribes. The cladistic analysis shows that theAsclepiadaceae are nested within theApocynaceae. An amalgamation of the two families is therefore recommended. The subfamilial classification is also in need of revision: the subfamiliesPlumerioideae andApocynoideae of the current classifications are paraphyletic, as are many of the tribes. Potential subfamily candidates and characters traditionally used in the classification are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, V. A., Chase, M. W., Mishler, B. D., 1993: Character state weighting for cladistic analysis of protein-coding DNA sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 752–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: Functional constraints andrbcL evidence for land plant phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.81: 534–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon, H., 1891: Histoire des plantes. — Paris: Librarie Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartling, F. G., 1830: Ordines naturales plantarum. — Göttingen: Dieterich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., 1876a: Ordo CVI.Apocynaceae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum, pp. 681–728. — London: Lovell Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1876b: Ordo CVII.Asclepiadeae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum, pp. 728–785. — London: Lovell Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiteau, P., Allorge, L., 1978: Morphologie et biologie florales des Apocynacées: I. Différences essentielles entre les Plumérioïdées et les Tabernaemontanoïdées. — Adansonia17: 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Sur l'arille desMacoubeae et la classification de la sous-famille des Tabernaemontanoïdées (Apocynacées). — Adansonia15: 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B., 1995: Combined and separate analyses of morphological and molecular data in the plant familyRubiaceae. — Cladistics (in press).

  • —, 1992: Phylogeny of theRubiaceae and theLoganiaceae: congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? — Amer. J. Bot.79: 1171–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994:rbcL sequences support exclusion ofRetzia, Desfontainia, andNicodemia from theGentianales. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Subfamilial and tribal relationships in theRubiaceae based onrbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evolution42: 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994:Asteraceae — cladistics and classification. — Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Branch support and tree stability. — Cladistics10: 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., 1810a: On theAsclepiadeae. — Pre-printed from 1811, Mem Wern. Nat. Hist. Soc.1: 12–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1810b: Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae. — London: J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, A. A., 1955: Notes on AfricanAsclepiadaceae-VI. — Kew Bull.1955: 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1957: Notes on AfricanAsclepiadaceae-VIII. — Kew Bull.1956: 503–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P., de, 1844: Ordo CXXIX.Apocynaceae. — InCandolle, A. P. de, (Ed.): Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, pp. 317–489. — Paris: Fortin, Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. M., 1988: Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. — Cladistics4: 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1980: Angiospermernes taxonomi. — Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dave, Y., Kuriachen, P. M., 1991: Comparative anatomical characters ofPeriplocaceae follicles and their taxonomic significance. — Feddes Repert.102: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decaisne, J., 1844: Ordo CXXX.Asclepiadeae. — InCandolle, A. P. de, (Ed.): Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, pp. 490–665. — Paris: Fortin, Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeter, K., 1992: Vergleichende Asclepiadeenstudien. — Flora115: 130–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, S. R., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Restriction site mapping of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat: a molecular phylogeny of theAsteridae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 266–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier, B. C. J., 1829: Analyse des familles des plantes. — Tournay: Casterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endlicher, S. L., 1838: Genera plantarum. — Vienna: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1841: Enchiridion botanicum. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallen, M. E., 1985: The gynoecial development and systematic position ofAllamanda (Apocynaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.72: 572–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Floral structure in theApocynaceae: morphological, functional, and evolutionary aspects. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.106: 245–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., 1969: A successive approximations approach to character weighting. — Syst. Zool.18: 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. — Syst. Zool.22: 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Albert, V. A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., Kluge, A. G., 1995: Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. — Cladistics (in press).

  • Felsenstein, J., 1978: Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. — Syst. Zool.27: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. A., 1993: Estimating character weights during tree search. — Cladistics9: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, M. H. G., Backlund, A., Bremer, B., 1996: Phylogeny of theAsterales sensu lato based onrbcL sequences with particular reference to theGoodeniaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.199: 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1912: L'origine et le système phylétique des angiospermes exposés à l'aide de leur arbre généalogique. — Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Nat.1: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1973: The families of flowering plants, 3rd edn. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, W. S., Sanders, R. W., Donoghue, M. J., 1994: Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. — Harvard Pap. Bot.5: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussieu, A. L. de, 1789: Genera plantarum. — Zurich: Viduam Herissant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Källersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., Bult, C., 1992: Skewness and permutation. — Cladistics8: 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenboeck, B., Spatafora, J. W., Zhang, X., Kousolas, K. G., Blackwell, M., Storz, J., 1992: Efficient production of single-stranded DNA as long as 2 kb for sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA. — Biotechniques12: 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, H., 1993: Evolution of the translator inPeriplocaceae andAsclepiadaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.185: 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, A. J. M., 1994: Taxa of theApocynaceae above the genus level. Series of revisions ofApocynaceae XXXVIII. — Wageningen Agric. Univ. Pap.94: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liede, S., Albers, F., 1994: Tribal disposition of genera in theAsclepiadaceae. — Taxon43: 201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: A descriptive system for corona analysis inAsclepiadaceae andPeriplocaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.185: 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ly, T. D., 1986: Die FamilieApocynaceae Juss. in Vietnam. Teil 1. Allgemeiner Teil. — Feddes Repert.97: 235–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, A., Baijnath, H., 1994: A consensus classification for the orderGentianales with additional details on the suborderApocyninae. — Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)60: 440–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S., Endress, M. E., Grafström, E., 1993: On the relationship of theApocynaceae andPeriplocaceae. — Grana Suppl.2: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C., Carpenter, J. M., 1993: On outgroups. — Cladistics9: 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., Michaels, H. J., Scott, K. M., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Monophyly of theAsteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences ofrbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: A parsimony analysis of theAsteridae sensu lato based onrbcL sequences. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 700–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichon, M., 1948a: Classification des Apocynacées I, Carissées et Ambelaniées. — Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.24: 111–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1948b: Classification des Apocynacées: V, Cerberoidées. — Notul. Syst. (Paris)13: 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1948c: Classification des Apocynacées: IX, Rauvolfiées, Alstoniées, Allamandées et Tabernaémontanoidées. — Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.27: 153–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1948d: Classification des Apocynacées: XIX. Le rétinacle des Echitoïdées. — Bull. Soc. Bot. France95: 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1950: Classification des Apocynacées: XXV, Échitoïdées. — Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Ser. B, Bot.1: 1–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. A., Palmer, J. D., 1993: Phylogenetic relationships of theGeraniaceae andGeraniales fromrbcL sequence comparisons. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosatti, T. J., 1989: The genera of suborderApocynineae (Apocynaceae andAsclepiadaceae) in the southeastern United States. — J. Arnold Arbor.70: 307–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safwat, F. M., 1962: The floral morphology ofSecamone and the evolution of the pollinating apparatus inAsclepiadaceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.49: 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A., Allard, R. W., 1984: Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81: 8014–8018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., Coulson, A. R., 1977: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA74: 5463–5467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, B., 1980: Untersuchungen über die Biotechnik der Apocynaceenblüte I. Morphologie und Funktion des Narbenkopfes. — Flora, Morphol. Geobot. Oekophysiol.170: 394–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechter, R., 1927:Periplocaceae. — InFries, R. E., Fries, T. C. E., (Eds): Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora des Kenia, Mt. Aberdare und Mt. Elgon. V. — Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem9: 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K., 1895a:Apocynaceae. — InEngler, H. G. A., Prantl, K. A. E., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien IV/2, pp. 109–189. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1895b:Asclepiadaceae. — InEngler, H. G. A., Prantl, K. A. E., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien IV/2, pp. 189–306. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapf, O., 1902: Order LXXXIV.Apocynaceae. — InThiselton-Dyer, W. T., (Ed.): Flora of Tropical Africa, pp. 24–231. — Ashford, Kent: Lovell Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. — London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struwe, L., Albert, V. A., Bremer, B., 1994: Cladistics and family level classification ofGentianales. — Cladistics10: 175–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, 3.1.1. — Champaign, Illinois.: Centre of Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1987: Systema Magnoliophytorum. — Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1992: An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. — Aliso13: 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, R. L., Venter, H. J. T., 1988: Pollen morphology ofRaphionacme (Periplocaceae). — S African J. Bot.54: 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G., 1959: Die systematische Stellung derRubiaceae. Ein Beitrag zum System der Sympetalen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.79: 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1964:Gentianales. — InMelchior, H., (Ed.):A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II, pp. 411–417. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: TheAsteridae: Evolution of a concept and its present status. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanntorp, H.-E., 1988: The genusMicroloma (Asclepiadaceae). — Opera Bot.98: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, R., Jr., 1930: Studies in theApocynaceae. I. A critical study of theApocynoideae (with special reference to the genusApocynum). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.17: 1–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sennblad, B., Bremer, B. The familial and subfamilial relationships ofApocynaceae andAsclepiadaceae evaluated withrbcL data. Pl Syst Evol 202, 153–175 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983380

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983380

Key words

Navigation