Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 194, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Self-compatibility in distylousHedyotis salzmannii (Rubiaceae)

  • G. Magaly Riveros
  • O. Rosa Barría
  • P. Ana María Humaña
Article

Abstract

Hedyotis salzmannii (Rubiaceae) is distylous. Experimental pollination revealed that both morphs are self-compatible. However, the thrum morph proved to be more self-compatible. Hand cross-pollination between different plants of the same floral form produced less seed-sets per pollination than hand cross-pollination between pin and thrum or thrum and pin pollination. Two species ofHymenoptera, oneApidae and oneHalictidae, and two species ofDiptera (Syrphidae) were observed as pollinators.

Key words

Rubiaceae Hedyotis salzmannii Flower morphology pollination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arroyo, M. T. Kalin, Primack, R., Armesto, J. J., 1982: Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. — Amer. J. Bot.69: 82–97.Google Scholar
  2. —,Armesto, J. J., Primack, R., 1985: Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of Central Chile. II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. — Pl. Syst. Evol.149: 187–203.Google Scholar
  3. Bawa, K. S., Beach, J. H., 1983: Self-incompatibility systems in theRubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. — Amer. J. Bot.70: 1281–1288.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, J. H., Bawa, K. S., 1980: Role of pollinators in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. — Evolution34: 1138–1142.Google Scholar
  5. Bir Bahadur, 1968: Heterostyly inRubiaceae: a review. — J. Osmania University (Science). Golden Jubilee Spec. Vol.: 207–238.Google Scholar
  6. Dulberger, R., 1974: Structural dimorphism of stigmatic papillae in distylousLinum species. — Amer. J. Bot.61: 238–243.Google Scholar
  7. Fyfe, V. C., 1950: The genetics of tristyly inOxalis valdiviensis. — Heredity4: 365–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganders, F. R., 1974: Disassortative pollination in the distylous plantJepsonia heterandra. — Canad. J. Bot.52: 2401–2406.Google Scholar
  9. —, 1979a: The biology of heterostyly. — New Zealand J. of Bot.17: 607–635.Google Scholar
  10. —, 1979b: Heterostyly inLithospermum cobrense (Boraginaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.66: 746–748.Google Scholar
  11. Gay, C., 1847: Historia Física y Política de Chile. — Paris: Fain & Thunot.Google Scholar
  12. Grimaldi, D., 1988: Bee flies and bluets:Bombylius (Diptera: Bombyliidae) flower-constant on the distylous species,Hedyotis caerulea (Rubiaceae), and the manner of foraging. — J. Nat. History22: 1–10.Google Scholar
  13. Lloyd, D. G., 1979: Parental strategies of angiosperms. — New Zealand J. Bot.17: 595–606.Google Scholar
  14. Marticorena, C., Quezada, M., 1985: Catálogo de la Flora Vascular de Chile. — Gayana, Botáncia42: 1–155.Google Scholar
  15. de Nettancourt, D., 1977: Incompatibility in angiosperms. — Monogr. Theoret. Appl. Genet.3. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Ornduff, R., 1966: The origin of dioecism from heterostyly inNymphoides (Menyanthaceae). — Evolution20: 309–314.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1971: The reproductive system ofJepsonia heterandra. — Evolution25: 300–311.Google Scholar
  18. —, 1977: An unusual heterostyly inHedyotis caerulea (Rubiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.127: 293–297.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1978: Features of pollen flow in dimorphic species ofLythrum sectionEuhyssopifolia. — Amer. J. Bot.65: 1077–1083.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1980: Heterostyly, population composition, and pollen flow inHedyotis caerulea. — Amer. J. Bot.67: 95–103.Google Scholar
  21. Paredes, R. K., 1989: Actividad de los polinizadores y su acción sobre la eficiencia reproductiva. — Thesis, Institute of Botany, Universidad Austral de Chile.Google Scholar
  22. Philipp, M., Schou, O., 1981: An unusual heteromorphic incompatbility system: distyly, self-incompatibility, pollen load and fecundity inAnchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). — New Phytol.89: 693–703.Google Scholar
  23. Reiche, C., 1902: Flora de Chile.3. — Barcelona: Imprenta Litografia I Encuadernación.Google Scholar
  24. Riveros, M., Arroyo, M. T. Kalin, Humaña, A. M., 1987: An unusual kind of distyly inQuinchamalium chilense (Santalaceae) on Volcán Casablanca, southern Chile. — Amer. J. Bot.74: 313–320.Google Scholar
  25. Ruiz, T., Arroyo, M. T., 1978: Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. — Biotropica10: 221–230.Google Scholar
  26. Sobrevila, C., Arroyo, M. T., 1982: Breeding systems in a montane tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. — Pl. Syst. Evol.140: 19–37.Google Scholar
  27. —,Ramirez, N., De Enrech, N. X., 1983: Reproductive biology ofPalicourea fendleri andP. petiolaris (Rubiaceae) heterostylous shrubs of tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. — Biotrópica15: 161–169.Google Scholar
  28. Vuilleumier, B. S., 1967: The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. — Evolution21: 210–226.Google Scholar
  29. Wyatt, R., Hellwig, R., 1979: Factors determining fruit set in heterostylous bluets,Houstonia caerulea (Rubiaceae). — Syst. Bot.4: 103–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Magaly Riveros
    • 1
  • O. Rosa Barría
    • 1
  • P. Ana María Humaña
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de BotánicaFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile

Personalised recommendations