Skip to main content
Log in

Phyletic diversity in higher plants

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “phyletic diversity” is used here to denote the continued co-existence and evolution of separate major phyletic groups which have a similar mode of life (e.g. within the angiosperms). This work attempts to show that an understanding of the factors which determine the degree of phyletic diversity could contribute to understanding the nature and evolution of higher taxonomic categories, such as families. The opposite of phyletic diversity, phyletic uniformity (Fig. 1A—B), should result from unequal evolutionary rates of different groups and repeated adaptive radiations of the most successful groups; the following competition for essential, limiting resources should lead to the extinction of all less rapidly evolving, inferior groups. At least some plant families are shown to have specific adaptive specializations which give them competitive advantages for part of the environmental resources only. This ensures their co-existence and the maintainance of phyletic diversity. The nature of these family specializations is considered briefly. It is shown that physiological adaptations to particular conditions, symbioses which aid in obtaining nutrients and, especially, chemical defence mechanisms could be major components of these specializations and thereby the raison d'être of plant families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, D. I., 1952: A theory of angiosperm evolution. — Evolution6, 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brues, C. T., 1920: The selection of food-plants by insects with special reference to lepidopterous larvae. — Am. Nat.54, 313–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, T. A., 1968: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1973: Adaptive significance of major taxonomic characters and of morphological trends in Angiosperms. InHeywood, V. H. (Ed.): Taxonomy and ecology, 317–327.—London, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., Raven, P. H., 1965: Butterflies and plants: a study of coevolution. — Evolution18, 586–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. M., Feeny, P., 1974: Sinigrin: a chemical barrier to larvae of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. — Ecology55, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. T., 1971: Evolutionary, adaptive and environmental aspects of the photosynthetic pathway: assessment. InHatch, M. D., Osmond, C.B., Slatyer, R. O. (Eds.): Photosynthesis and photorespiration, 130–136.—New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P., 1975: Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores. InGilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. (Eds.): Coevolution of animals and plants, Proc. First Int. Cong. Syst. and Evol. Biol. 3–19. —Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G. J., 1959: The raison d'être of secondary plant substances. — Science129, 1466–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. (Eds.), 1975: Coevolution of plants and animals. Proc. First Int. Cong. Syst. and Evol. Biol. — Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B., Boulter, D., Turner, B. L. (Eds.), 1971: Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae. — London & New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. L., 1969: Biology of mycorrhiza. 2 ed. — London: Leonard Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1962–1973: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. — Basel & Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1965: Homage to Santa Rosalia, or, why are there so many kinds of animals? — Am. Nat.93, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H., 1970: The role of herbivores in tropical tree species diversity. — Am. Nat.104, 501–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1971: Plant phenolics: an ecological perspective — Am. Nat-105, 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. C., Kozlowski, T. G. (Eds.), 1973: Ectomycorrhizae. Their ecology and physiology. — New York & London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. — Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S., 1969: Competition and species diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.22, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutman, P. S. (Ed.), 1976: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in plants. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. L., Thomas, M., 1960: Crassulacean acid metabolism. — Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol.11, 81–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., Curtis, H., 1970: Biology of plants. — New York: Worth Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, D., Price, P. W., 1976: Secondary compounds in plants: primary functions. — Am. Nat.110, 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1961: Principles of Animal Taxonomy. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solreder, H., 1908: Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. TranslatedBoodle, L. A., Fritsch, F. E., revisedScott, D. H. — Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E., 1961: The number of insects associated with various trees. — J. Animal Ecol.30, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E., 1973: The insect/plant relationship — an evolutionary perspective. InVan Emden, H. F. (Ed.): Insect/plant relationship. — Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc., London,6, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1967: Adaptive radiation and trends of evolution in higher plants. — Evol. Biol.1, 101–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Relationship between adaptive radiation, speciation and major evolutionary trends. — Taxon20, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. — Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, D., 1976: Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource based theory. — Science192, 463–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. W., Mansell, R. L. (Eds.), 1976: Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent Adv. Phytochem.10. — New York & London: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., 1970: The biochemical ecology of higher plants. InSondheimer, E., Simeone, J. B. (Eds.): Chemical ecology, 43–70. — New York & London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., Feeny, P. P., 1971: Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. — Science171, 757–770.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachs, T. Phyletic diversity in higher plants. Pl Syst Evol 130, 1–11 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983071

Key words

Navigation