Abstract
The term “phyletic diversity” is used here to denote the continued co-existence and evolution of separate major phyletic groups which have a similar mode of life (e.g. within the angiosperms). This work attempts to show that an understanding of the factors which determine the degree of phyletic diversity could contribute to understanding the nature and evolution of higher taxonomic categories, such as families. The opposite of phyletic diversity, phyletic uniformity (Fig. 1A—B), should result from unequal evolutionary rates of different groups and repeated adaptive radiations of the most successful groups; the following competition for essential, limiting resources should lead to the extinction of all less rapidly evolving, inferior groups. At least some plant families are shown to have specific adaptive specializations which give them competitive advantages for part of the environmental resources only. This ensures their co-existence and the maintainance of phyletic diversity. The nature of these family specializations is considered briefly. It is shown that physiological adaptations to particular conditions, symbioses which aid in obtaining nutrients and, especially, chemical defence mechanisms could be major components of these specializations and thereby the raison d'être of plant families.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axelrod, D. I., 1952: A theory of angiosperm evolution. — Evolution6, 29–60.
Brues, C. T., 1920: The selection of food-plants by insects with special reference to lepidopterous larvae. — Am. Nat.54, 313–332.
Cronquist, T. A., 1968: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ehrendorfer, F., 1973: Adaptive significance of major taxonomic characters and of morphological trends in Angiosperms. InHeywood, V. H. (Ed.): Taxonomy and ecology, 317–327.—London, New York: Academic Press.
Ehrlich, P. R., Raven, P. H., 1965: Butterflies and plants: a study of coevolution. — Evolution18, 586–608.
Erickson, J. M., Feeny, P., 1974: Sinigrin: a chemical barrier to larvae of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. — Ecology55, 103–111.
Evans, L. T., 1971: Evolutionary, adaptive and environmental aspects of the photosynthetic pathway: assessment. InHatch, M. D., Osmond, C.B., Slatyer, R. O. (Eds.): Photosynthesis and photorespiration, 130–136.—New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Feeny, P., 1975: Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores. InGilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. (Eds.): Coevolution of animals and plants, Proc. First Int. Cong. Syst. and Evol. Biol. 3–19. —Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Fraenkel, G. J., 1959: The raison d'être of secondary plant substances. — Science129, 1466–1470.
Gilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. (Eds.), 1975: Coevolution of plants and animals. Proc. First Int. Cong. Syst. and Evol. Biol. — Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Harborne, J. B., Boulter, D., Turner, B. L. (Eds.), 1971: Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae. — London & New York: Academic Press.
Harley, J. L., 1969: Biology of mycorrhiza. 2 ed. — London: Leonard Hill.
Hegnauer, R., 1962–1973: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. — Basel & Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.
Hutchinson, G. E., 1965: Homage to Santa Rosalia, or, why are there so many kinds of animals? — Am. Nat.93, 145–159.
Janzen, D. H., 1970: The role of herbivores in tropical tree species diversity. — Am. Nat.104, 501–518.
Levin, D. A., 1971: Plant phenolics: an ecological perspective — Am. Nat-105, 157–181.
Marks, G. C., Kozlowski, T. G. (Eds.), 1973: Ectomycorrhizae. Their ecology and physiology. — New York & London: Academic Press.
Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. — Oxford: University Press.
Miller, R. S., 1969: Competition and species diversity. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.22, 63–70.
Nutman, P. S. (Ed.), 1976: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in plants. — Cambridge: University Press.
Ranson, S. L., Thomas, M., 1960: Crassulacean acid metabolism. — Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol.11, 81–110.
Raven, P. H., Curtis, H., 1970: Biology of plants. — New York: Worth Publ.
Siegler, D., Price, P. W., 1976: Secondary compounds in plants: primary functions. — Am. Nat.110, 101–105.
Simpson, G. G., 1961: Principles of Animal Taxonomy. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Solreder, H., 1908: Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. TranslatedBoodle, L. A., Fritsch, F. E., revisedScott, D. H. — Oxford: University Press.
Southwood, T. R. E., 1961: The number of insects associated with various trees. — J. Animal Ecol.30, 1–8.
Southwood, T. R. E., 1973: The insect/plant relationship — an evolutionary perspective. InVan Emden, H. F. (Ed.): Insect/plant relationship. — Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc., London,6, 3–30.
Stebbins, G. L., 1967: Adaptive radiation and trends of evolution in higher plants. — Evol. Biol.1, 101–142.
Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Relationship between adaptive radiation, speciation and major evolutionary trends. — Taxon20, 3–16.
Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering plants. Evolution above the species level. — Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, Harvard Univ. Press.
Titman, D., 1976: Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource based theory. — Science192, 463–465.
Wallace, J. W., Mansell, R. L. (Eds.), 1976: Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Recent Adv. Phytochem.10. — New York & London: Plenum Press.
Whittaker, R. H., 1970: The biochemical ecology of higher plants. InSondheimer, E., Simeone, J. B. (Eds.): Chemical ecology, 43–70. — New York & London: Academic Press.
Whittaker, R. H., Feeny, P. P., 1971: Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. — Science171, 757–770.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sachs, T. Phyletic diversity in higher plants. Pl Syst Evol 130, 1–11 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983071
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983071