Conclusions
-
1.
The circuit in Fig. 3 has substantial advantages as compared with that in Fig. 1, since with a considerably reduced number of mutual control circuit components it provides a higher probability of obtaining a correct conversion of the measured quantity.
-
2.
The application of iteration for increasing the probability of correctly converting the measured quantity by means of the circuits in question (Figs. 1 and 3) is not promising, since it increases substantially the complexity of the system and in principle cannot provide a value of Pc exceeding P3 or P2 (Fig. 2).
-
3.
For a sufficiently large probability of the converters disconnecting themselves the application of a mutual control device can be inadvisable. In order to decide on the advisability of applying a MCS device it is necessary to use criterion (15).
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Suren, Zarubezhnaya radioélektronika, No. 5 (1965).
B. V. Gnedenko, Yu. K. Belyaev, and A. D. Solov'ev, Mathematical Methods and the Theory of Reliability [in Russian], Izd. Nauka, Moscow (1965).
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 9, pp. 14–17, September, 1967.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zholkover, T.D., Yakovlev, A.I. Utilization of the standby of signal transducers for raising the probability of obtaining correct measurement results. Meas Tech 10, 1039–1043 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982871
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982871