Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 205, Issue 1–2, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Evolution of flower shape inVeroniceae (Scrophulariaceae)

  • C. M. Kampny
  • N. G. Dengler
Article

Abstract

Floral evolution in the tribeVeroniceae was examined using phylogenetic analysis combining 24 adult morphology and chromosome number characters with 22 qualitative and quantitative floral development characters. Taxa sampled included nine species ofVeroniceae and as an outgroup one species each ofDigitaleae andVerbasceae. Veronica, Besseya, andSynthyris formed one clade, subtended byPseudolysimachion and then by theHebe group;Veronicastrum orWulfenia represent the basal-most branch of the tribe. The ancestral flowers of theVeroniceae may have been small with moderately short corolla tubes and lobes; long corolla tubes arose four times in the tribe and large corolla lobes twice.

Key words

Veroniceae Scrophulariaceae Flower shape flower development quantitative developmental character phylogeny evolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., Wake, D. B., 1979: Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. — Paleobiology5: 296–317.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J. E., Douglas, A. W., 1989: The ontogenetic basis for corolla aestivation inScrophulariaceae. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club116: 378–389.Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, G., 1846:Scrophulariaceae. — InDeCandolle, A. P., (Ed.): Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis,10, pp. 186–586.Google Scholar
  4. —, 1876:Scrophulariaceae. — InBentham, G., Hooker, J. D., (Eds): Genera plantarum2, pp. 913–980.Google Scholar
  5. Best, L. S., Bierzychudek, P., 1982: Pollinator foraging on foxglove (Digitalis purpurea): a test of a new model. — Evolution36: 70–79.Google Scholar
  6. Delph, L. F., 1990: The evolution of gender dimorphism in New ZealandHebe (Scrophulariaceae). — Evol. Trends Pl.4: 85–97.Google Scholar
  7. DePamphilis, C. W., Atkinson, T. N., Elisens, W. J., 1994: Tribal relationships inScrophulariaceae subfamilyAntirrhinoideae: Insights from sequence variation of the plastid-encoded generps2. — Amer. J. Bot. (Suppl.)81: 152 (abstract).Google Scholar
  8. Diggle, P. K., 1992: Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters. — InWyatt, R., (Ed.):Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: new approaches, pp. 326–355. — New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Endress, P. K., 1994: Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, J., 1920: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und Morphologie der Veronicablüte. — Z. Bot.12: 113–161.Google Scholar
  11. Garnock-Jones, P. J., 1976: Breeding systems and pollination in New ZealandParahebe (Scrophulariaceae). — New Zealand J. Bot.14: 291–298.Google Scholar
  12. —, 1993: Phylogeny of theHebe complex (Scrophulariaceae: Veroniceae). — Austral. Syst. Bot.6: 457–479.Google Scholar
  13. Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G., Hunt, R., 1988: Comparative plant ecology. — London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  14. Guerrant, E. O., 1982: Neotenic evolution ofDelphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae), a hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. — Evolution36: 699–712.Google Scholar
  15. Hong, D.-Y., 1984: Taxonomy and evolution of theVeroniceae (Scrophulariaceae) with special reference to palynology. — Opera Bot.75: 5–60.Google Scholar
  16. Hufford, L., 1988: Roles of early ontogenetic modifications in the evolution of floral form ofEucnide (Loasaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.109: 289–333.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1992: Floral structure ofBesseya andSynthyris (Scrophulariaceae). — Int. J. Pl. Sci.153: 217–229.Google Scholar
  18. Kampny, C. M., 1995a: Evolution of flower shape inVeroniceae (Scrophulariaceae). — Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1995b: Pollination and flower diversity inScrophulariaceae. — Bot. Rev.61: 350–366.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1995c: AreSynthyris andBesseya closely related toWulfenia (Veroniceae-Scrophulariaceae)? Evidence from floral development. — Canad. J. Bot.73: 1662–1675.Google Scholar
  21. —, Canne-Hilliker, J. M., 1987: Patterns of floral development inAgalinis and allies (Scrophulariaceae). I. Floral development inAgalinis fasciculata andA. tenuifolia. — Canad. J. Bot.65: 2255–2262.Google Scholar
  22. —, —, 1988: Aspects of floral development inScrophulariaceae — striking early differences in three tribes. — InLeins, P., Tucker, S. C., Endress, P. K., (Eds): Aspects of floral development, pp. 147–157. — Stuttgart: Borntraeger.Google Scholar
  23. —, Dickinson, T. A., Dengler, N. G., 1993: Quantitative comparison of floral development inVeronica chamaedrys andVeronicastrum virginicum. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 449–460.Google Scholar
  24. —, —, —, 1994: Quantitative floral development inPseudolysimachion: intraspecific variation and comparison withVeronica andVeronicastrum. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1343–1353.Google Scholar
  25. Kellogg, E. A., 1990: Ontogenetic studies of florets inPoa (Gramineae): allometry and heterochrony. — Evolution44: 1978–1989.Google Scholar
  26. Kirchoff, B. K., 1983: Allometric growth of the flowers in five genera of theMarantaceae and inCanna (Cannaceae). — Bot. Gaz.144: 110–118.Google Scholar
  27. Lepper, L., 1970: Die Evolution der GattungWulfenia Jacq.—ein Beitrag zumWulfenia-Problem. — Wiss. Z. Friedrich-Schiller-Univ. Jena, Math.-Naturwiss. Reihe19: 345–361.Google Scholar
  28. —, 1984: Morphologie und Morphogenese der Blüte vonWulfenia Jacq. (Scrophulariaceae). — Wiss. Friedrich-Schiller-Univ. Jena, Math. / Naturwiss. Reihe33: 821–843.Google Scholar
  29. Lord, E. M., Hill, J. P., 1987: Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. — InRaff, R. A., Raff, E. C., (Eds): Development as an evolutionary process, pp. 47–70. — New York: Liss.Google Scholar
  30. Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. — Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  31. Nilsson, S., Hong, D.-Y., 1993: The taxonomic significance ofAragoa pollen (Scrophulariaceae). — Opera Bot.121: 275–278.Google Scholar
  32. Noll, F., 1883: Entwicklungsgeschichte derVeronica-Bluethe. — Dissertation. University of Marburg. — Frankfurt: Mahlau & Waldschmidt.Google Scholar
  33. Payer, J.-B., 1857: Traité d'organogenie comparée de la fleur. (Reprint 1966). — Lehre: Cramer.Google Scholar
  34. Pennell, F. W., 1921: “Veronica” in North and South America. — Rhodora23: 1–39.Google Scholar
  35. —, 1933: A revision ofSynthyris andBesseya. — Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia85: 77–106.Google Scholar
  36. - 1935: TheScrophulariaceae of eastern temperate North America. — Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Monogr.1.Google Scholar
  37. Saunders, E. R., 1934: A study ofVeronica from the viewpoint of certain floral characters. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.49: 453–493.Google Scholar
  38. Statistical Sciences, Inc., 1993: S-plus for Windows, user's manual, version 3.1. computer program. — Seattle: Statistical Sciences, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP — Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. computer program. — Champaign, Illinois: Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
  40. Thieret, J. W., 1955: The seeds ofVeronica and allied genera. — Lloydia18: 37–45.Google Scholar
  41. Tucker, S. C., 1984: Unidirectional organ initiation in leguminous flowers. — Amer. J. Bot.71: 1139–1148.Google Scholar
  42. —, Douglas, A. W., Liang, H.-X., 1993: Utility of ontogenetic and conventional characters in determining phylogenetic relationships ofSaururaceae andPiperaceae. — Syst. Bot.18: 614–641.Google Scholar
  43. Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., 1972:Veronica L., includingPseudolysimachion (Koch)Opiz. — InTutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H.,Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds): Flora Europaea,3, pp. 242–251. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Werner, K., 1965: Taxonomie und Phylogenie der GattungenIsoplexis (Lindl.)Benth. undDigitalis L. — Feddes Repert.70: 109–135.Google Scholar
  45. Wettstein, R., 1891:Scrophulariaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,IV/ 3b, pp. 39–107. — Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
  46. Wilkinson, L., 1990: SYSTAT: software and user's manuals. — Evanston, Illinois: Systat.Google Scholar
  47. Wunderlin, U., 1992: Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsgeschichte von Scrophulariaceen-Blüten. — Diss. Bot.188. — Berlin, Stuttgart: Cramer (Borntraeger).Google Scholar
  48. Yamazaki, T., 1957: Taxonomical and phylogenetic studies ofScrophulariaceae:Veroniceae, with special reference toVeronica andVeronicastrum in eastern Asia. — J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 3, Bot.7: 91–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Kampny
    • 1
  • N. G. Dengler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations