Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation and hybridization in SwedishSchoenus (Cyperaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schoenus ferrugineus andS. nigricans have restricted distributions in Sweden and are almost exclusively confined to calcareous fen habitats. AtS. nigricans sites,S. ferrugineus is usually also present, and hybrids are frequently found. In this report, I used allozymes to estimate the amount of gene flow between the two species, and to compare the partitioning of genetic diversity in each of them. Thirteen loci were analysed at eight different enzyme systems. Seven loci were variable between or within the species. The two species had completely different alleles at two of the seven variable loci, whereas there was overlap at five loci. In all, 22 different alleles were found. Six of these alleles were confined toS. nigricans, and five alleles were confined toS. ferrugineus. Nei's genetic identity was 0.55.—InS. ferrugineus, three loci (23%) were polymorphic, and the average number of alleles per polymorphic locus was 2.0 (each polymorphic locus had two alleles). InS. nigricans, three loci (23%) were polymorphic, and the average number of alleles per polymorphic locus was 2.3.—The proportion of genetic diversity due to variation among sites (G ST) was fairly similar in the two species, mean over loci = 0.12 inS. ferrugineus and 0.15 inS. nigricans. However, the proportion of genetic diversity due to variation among individuals within sites (G IS) differed markedly between the two species, mean over loci = 0.54 inS. ferrugineus and 0.17 inS. nigricans. Accordingly, there was a much higher individual heterozygosity inS. nigricans than inS. ferrugineus. — Most hybrids were interpreted as F1 hybrids. However, a small proportion, 0.5–1.6 %, were Fn hybrids or back-crosses.—On the Swedish mainland, all former occurrences ofS. nigricans are extinct, but viable hybrids are still present at a few sites in southernmost Sweden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton, G. C., Braden, A. W. H., 1964: Serum β-globulin polymorphism in mice. — Austral. J. Biol. Sci.14: 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H., Husband, B. C., 1989: The genetics of plant migration and colonization. — InBrown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., Weir, B. S., (Eds): Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, pp. 254–277. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. — InFalk, D. A., Holsinger, K. E., (Eds): Genetics and conservation of rare plants, pp. 3–30. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Isozyme variation in colonizing plants. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S, (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 106–126. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G., Moore, D. M., 1987: Flora of the British Isles. 3rd edn. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D.J., 1989: Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 146–164. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstam, U., Jacobson, R., Mattson, M., Porsne, T., 1984: Ölands och Gotlands växtvärld. — Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, M., 1965: The Late-Quaternary vegetation of Sweden. — Acta Phytogeogr. Suec.50: 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E., 1987: Spatial structure and population vulnerability. — InSoulè, M. E., (Ed.): Viable populations for conservation, pp. 125–139. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1981: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — InReinhold, L., Harborne, J.B., Swain, T., (Eds): Progress in phytochemistry,7, pp. 1–46. — Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C., 1966: Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. — Biometrika53: 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L.-Å., 1979: The vascular plants in seven parishes of the province of Skåne. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.73: 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L., 1989: Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 87–105. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Allozyme diversity in plant species. — InBrown, A. H. D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., Weir, B. S., (Eds): Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, pp. 43–63. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraldsen, K. B., Wesenberg, J., 1993: Population genetic analysis of an amphi-Atlantic species:Lychnis alpina (Caryophyllaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.13: 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: Variation in the amphi-Atlantic plantVahlodea atropurpurea (Poaceae). — J. Biogeogr.18: 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrén, M., Prentice, H. C., 1996: Allozyme variation and racial differentiation in SwedishCarex lepidocarpa s. l. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.58 (in press).

  • Hegi, G., 1966: Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 2/1. — München: Carl Hauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, E., 1971: Atlas över växternas utbredning i Norden, 2nd edn. — Stockholm: Generalstabens Litografiska Anstalts Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Atlas of North European vascular plants. — Königstein: Koeltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, N., 1966: Nordisk kärlväxtflora II. — Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. N., Danzik, B. P., 1983: Inheritance and linkage of isozymes in white spruce (Picea glauca). — Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.25: 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, J., 1982: Floran i Brunnby socken med Kullaberg. — Lund: Botaniska Centralredaktionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., Barrowclough, G. F., 1987: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. — InSoulé, M. E., (Ed.): Viable populations for conservation, pp. 87–123. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lid, J., 1985: Norsk, svensk, finsk flora. 5th edn. — Oslo: Det norske samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lönn, M., Prentice, H. C., 1990: Mosaic variation in SwedishPetrorhagia prolifera (Caryophyllaceae): the partitioning of morphometric and electrophoretic diversity. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.41: 353–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, Tegelström, H., 1995: Genetic differentiation inHippocrepis emerus (Leguminosae): allozyme and DNA fingerprint variation in disjunct Scandinavian populations. — Molec. Ecol.4: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1973: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA70: 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1975: The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. — Evolution29: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, B., 1958: Dynamik och konstans i Gotlands vegetation och flora. — Acta Phytogeogr. Suec.40.

  • , 1965: Gotland and Öland — two limestone islands compared. — Acta Phytogeogr. Suec.50: 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, H. C., 1992: The structure of morphometric and allozyme variation in relict populations ofGypsophila fastigiata (Caryophyllaceae) in Sweden. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.47: 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: Variability, population size and isolation: the structuring of diversity in ÖlandGypsophila fastigiata. — Acta Oecol./Oecol. Pl.9: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. S., 1972: Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. — Stud. Genet.7: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J., 1994: NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. — Setauket, New York: Exeter software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, R. D., Wolff, J. O., 1986: Pleistocene glaciations, fluctuating ranges, and low genetic variability in a large mammal (Ovis dalli). — Evolution40: 1092–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1990: SAS/STAT user's guide. — Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B., 1983: Notes on nomenclature and taxonomy of theCarex flava group in Europe. — Watsonia14: 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Haufler, C. H., Darrow, D. C., Gastony, G. J., 1983: Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. — Amer. Fern J.73: 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling, J. H., 1968: Biological flora of the British Isles:Schoenus nigricans L. — J. Ecol.56: 883–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. A., 1980:Schoenus. — InTutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds): Flora Europaea5, p. 289. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N. F., Wendel, J. F., 1989: Genetics of plant isozymes. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 46–72. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, J. F., Weeden, N. F., 1989: Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. — InSoltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., (Eds): Isozymes in plant biology, pp. 5–45. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimarck, H., 1963: Skånes Flora. — Lund: Corona.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. J., 1991: Mule, version 1.63. — Fordingsbridge, U.K.: Fair View Software.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedrèn, M. Genetic variation and hybridization in SwedishSchoenus (Cyperaceae). Pl Syst Evol 204, 21–37 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982529

Key words

Navigation