Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 3531–3544 | Cite as

Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. IX. Differential response ofTrichogramma pretiosum, an egg parasitoid ofHeliothis zea, to various olfactory cues

  • L. P. J. J. Noldus
  • W. J. Lewis
  • J. H. Tumlinson
Article

Abstract

The behavior ofTrichogramma pretiosum Nixon wasps when exposed to different olfactory cues was studied in a wind tunnel. Compared to clean air, the sex pheromone of its hostHeliothis zea (Boddie) increased wasp residence times, walking times, and path lengths on a platform and decreased walking velocity. If wasps were released on top of a glass rod above a platform, the odor caused the wasps to land shortly after takeoff. In addition, a clear dose effect with regard to total residence and walking times was found. These responses were not elicited by three dosages of the sex pheromone ofSpodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) or by a blend of saturated acetates. These results correspond with the observation thatH. zea is a common field host ofT. pretiosum, whereas eggs ofS. frugiperda are rarely attacked by this parasitoid.

Key Words

Trichogramma pretiosum Hymenoptera Trichogrammatidae Heliothis zea Spodoptera frugiperda Lepidoptera Noctuidae sex pheromone kairomone wind tunnel orientation behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braune, H.J. 1982. Einfluß der Gelegestruktur des Wirtes auf die Wirksamkeit eines Eiparasiten vonSpodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).Drosera 1:7–16.Google Scholar
  2. Burton, R.L. 1969. Mass rearing the corn earworm in the laboratory. USDA Tech. Bull., ARS Series 33–134, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Dijken, M.J. Van, Kole, M., Van Lenteren, J.C., andBrand, A.M. 1986. Host-preference studies withTrichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) forMamestra brassicae, Pieris brassicae and Pieris rapae.J. Appl. Entomol. 101:64–85.Google Scholar
  4. Harding, J.A. 1976.Heliothis spp.: Seasonal occurrence, hosts and host importance in the lower Rio Grande Valley.Environ. Entomol. 5:666–668.Google Scholar
  5. Hase, A. 1925. Beitrage zur Lebensgeschichte der SchlupfwespeTrichogramma evanescens West-wood.Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Land-Forstwirtsch. Berlin-Dahlem 14:171–224.Google Scholar
  6. Heath, R.R., Teal, P.E.A., Tumlinson, J.H., andMengelkoch, L.J. 1986. Prediction of release ratios of multicomponent pheromones from rubber septa.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:2133–2143.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, D.S. 1987. Agricultural Insect Pests of Temperate Zones and Their Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 659 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Hollander, M., andWolfe, D.A. 1973. Nonparametrical Statistical Methods. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, R.L. 1986. Orientation by insect parasitoids, pp. 149–156,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Kino, E.G., andColeman, R.J. 1989. Potential for biological control ofHeliothis species.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34:53–75.Google Scholar
  11. King, E.G., Bouse, L.F., Bull, D.L., Coleman, R.J., Dickerson, W.A., Lewis, W.J., Lopez, J.D., Morrison, R.K., andPhillips, J.R. 1986. Management ofHeliothis spp. in cotton by augmentative releases ofTrichogramma pretiosum Ril.J. Appl. Entomol. 101:2–10.Google Scholar
  12. Klun, J.A., Plimmer, J.R., Bierl-Leonhardt, B.A., Sparks, A.N., Primiani, M., Chapman, O.L., Lee, G.H., andLepone, G. 1980. Sex pheromone chemistry of female com earworm moth,Heliothis zea.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:165–175.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, W.J., Nordlund, D.A., Gueldner, R.C., Teal, P.E.A., andTumlinson, J.H. 1982. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects. XIII. Kairornonal activity forTrichogramma spp. of abdominal tips, excretion, and a synthetic sex pheromone blend ofHeliothis zea (Boddie) moths.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1323–1331.Google Scholar
  14. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1988. Response of the egg parasitoidTrichogramma pretiosum to the sex pheromone of its hostHeliothis zea.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:293–300.Google Scholar
  15. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1989a. The Observer: Integrated System for Event Recording and Data Analysis in Behavioural Research. User's Manual, Version 1.31 Edition. Agricultural University, Wageningen. 178 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1989b. Chemical espionage by parasitic wasps: HowTrichogramma species exploit moth sex pheromone systems. PhD thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen. 252 PP.Google Scholar
  17. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1989c. Semiochemicals, foraging behaviour and quality of entomophagous insects for biological control.J. Appl. Entomol. 108:425–451.Google Scholar
  18. Noldus, L.P.J.J. 1990. The Observer: a software package for collection and analysis of observational data on the IBM PC, with a program generator for non-IBM compatible computers. Submitted.Google Scholar
  19. Noldus, L.P.J.J., andvan Lenteren, J.C. 1985. Kairomones for the egg parasiteTrichogramma evanescens Westwood. I. Effect of volatile substances released by two of its hosts,Pieris brassicae L. andMamestra brassicaeL.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:781–791.Google Scholar
  20. Noldus, L.P.J.J., VanLenteren, J.C., andLewis, W.J. 1990a. HowTrichogramma parasitoids use moth sex pheromones as kairomones: Orientation behaviour in a wind tunnel.Physiol. Entomol., in press.Google Scholar
  21. Noldus, L.P.J.J.,Potting, R.P.J., andBarendregt, H.E. 1990b. Moth sex pheromone adsorption to leaf surface: Bridge in time for chemical spies.Physiol. Entomol., in press.Google Scholar
  22. Nordlund, D.A., Lewis, W.J., andGueldner, R.C. 1983. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects. XIV. Response ofTelenomus remus to abdominal tips ofSpodoptera frugiperda, (Z)-9-tetradecene-1-ol acetate and (Z)-9-dodecene-1-ol acetate.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:695–701.Google Scholar
  23. Pak, G.A. 1988. Selection ofTrichogramma for inundative biological control. PhD thesis. Agricultural University, Wageningen. 224 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Pinto, J.D., Oatman, E.R., andPlatner, G.R. 1986.Trichogramma pretiosum and a new cryptic species occurring sympatrically in southwestern North America (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:1019–1028.Google Scholar
  25. Pope, M.M., Gaston, L.K., andBaker, T.C. 1984. Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone volatiles from individualHeliothis zea females.J. Insect Physiol. 30:943–945.Google Scholar
  26. Reddingius, J., Schilstra, A.J., andThomas, G. 1983. The grid method in estimating the path length of a moving animal.J. Anim. Ecol. 52:199–208.Google Scholar
  27. Ridgway, R.L., Dickerson, W.A., Lopez, J.D., andInscoe, M.N. 1988. Use ofTrichogramma in the United States with special reference toHeliothis management on cotton, pp. 565–574,in J. Voegelé, J.K. Waage, and J.C. van Lenteren (eds.).Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasites (Guangzhou, 10–15 November 1986). Les Colloques de l'INRA No. 43. INRA, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Salt, G. 1934. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. III. Host selection.Proc. R. Soc. D, 117:413–435.Google Scholar
  29. SAS. 1985. SAS User's Guide, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Gary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  30. Sheehan, W. 1986. Response by specialist and generalist natural enemies to agroecosystem diversification: A selective review.Environ. Entomol. 15:456–461.Google Scholar
  31. Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo. 312 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Sparks, A.N. 1979. A review of the biology of the fall armyworm.Fla. Entomol. 62:82–87.Google Scholar
  33. STSC. 1986. Statgraphics User's Guide, Version 2.1 Edition. STSC, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  34. Sweetman, H.L. 1958. The Principles of Biological Control. Brown, Dubuque. 560 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Thomson, M.S., andStinner, R.E. 1989.Trichogramma spp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae): Field hosts and multiple parasitism in North Carolina.J. Entomol. Sci. 24:232–240.Google Scholar
  36. Tumlinson, J.H., andTeal, P.E.A. 1987. Relationship of structure and function to biochemistry in insect pheromone systems, pp. 3–26,in G.D. Prestwich, and G.J. Blomquist (eds.). Pheromone Biochemistry. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  37. Tumlinson, J.H., Mitchell, E.R., Teal, P.E.A., Heath, R.R., andMengelkoch, L.J. 1986. Sex pheromone of fall armyworm,Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith): Identification of components critical to attraction in the field.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1909–1926.Google Scholar
  38. Vickery, R.A. 1929. Studies on the fall army worm in the Gulf Coast district of Texas.USDA Tech. Bull. 138, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
  39. Vinson, S.B. 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21:109–134.Google Scholar
  40. Vinson, S.B. 1984. How parasitoids locate their hosts: a case of insect espionage, pp. 325–348,in T. Lewis (ed.). Insect Communication. Royal Entomological Society, London.Google Scholar
  41. Vinson, S.B. 1985. The behavior of parasitoids, pp. 417–469,in G.A. Kerkut, and L.I. Gilbert (eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 9. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Voegelé, J., Waage, J.K., andVan Lenteren, J.C. (eds. 1988.Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasites. Proceedings 2nd International Symposium (Guangzhou, 10–15 November 1986). Les Colloques de l'INRA No. 43. INRA, Paris. 644 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Woicik, B., Whitcomb, W.H., andHabeck, D.H. 1976. Host range testing ofTelenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae).Fla. Entomol. 59:195–198.Google Scholar
  44. Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27:411–446.Google Scholar
  45. Zaborski, E., Teal, P.E.A., andLaing, J.E. 1987. Kairomone-mediated host finding by the spruce budworm egg parasiteTrichogramma minutum J. Chem. Ecol. 13:113–122.Google Scholar
  46. Zanen, P.O., Lewis, W.J., Cardé, R.T., andMullinix, E.G. 1989. Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. VI. Flight responses of femaleMicroplitis croceipes (Cresson), a braconid endoparasitoid ofHeliothis spp., to varying olfactory stimulus conditions created with a turbulent jet.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:141–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. P. J. J. Noldus
    • 1
  • W. J. Lewis
    • 2
  • J. H. Tumlinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyAgricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Insect Biology & Population Management Research LaboratoryUSDA-ARSTifion
  3. 3.Insect Attractants, Behavior & Basic Biology Research LaboratoryUSDA-ARSGainesville

Personalised recommendations