Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 3317–3331 | Cite as

Olfactory-based behavioral interactions among five species in the southern pine bark beetle group

  • M. T. Smith
  • T. L. Payne
  • M. C. Birch
Article

Abstract

Olfactory-mediated behavioral interactions were investigated among the five scolytid species comprising the southern pine bark beetle group. Behavioral response, as determined from field trap catch data, showed that each species was attracted in greatest numbers to the pheromonal blend produced by conspecifies. Interspecifically,D. frontalis displayed no cross-attractancy toIps pheromonal blends, but was weakly attracted to the pheromonal blend of femaleD. terebrans. ThreeIps species displayed varying degrees of cross-attraction as well as to theDendroctonus pheromonal blends. More specifically,I. calligraphus was attracted toI. avulsus and, to a very limited extent, also to the maleD. terebrans pheromonal blend.I. avulsus was somewhat more cross-attractive thanI. calligraphus and showed attraction to the pheromonal blends of femaleD. frontalis, male and femaleD. terebrans, maleI. calligraphus, and maleI. grandicollis. I. grandicollis showed the greatest degree of cross-attraction, particularly in response to theDendroctonus pheromonal blends.

Key Words

Coleoptera Scolytidae bark beetle Dendroctonus Ips pheromone olfaction intraspecific interspecific behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billings, R.F. 1985. Southern pine bark beetles and associated insects: Effects of rapidly released host volatiles on response to aggregation pheromones.Sonderdruck Bd. 99:483–491.Google Scholar
  2. Birch, M.C., andSvihra, P. 1979. Novel approaches to forest insect control: Exploiting olfactory interactions between species of Scolytidae, pp 135–138,in W.E. Waters (ed.). Current Topics in Forest Entomology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Birch, M.C., Svihra, P., Paine, T.D., andMiller, J.C. 1980. Influence of chemically mediated behavior on host tree colonization by four cohabiting species of bark beetles.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:395–414.Google Scholar
  4. Dickens, J.C., andPayne, T.L. 1977. Bark beetle olfaction: Pheromone receptor system inDendroctonus frontalis.J. Insect. Physiol. 23:481–489.Google Scholar
  5. Dickens, J.C., andPayne, T.L. 1978. Olfactory-induced muscle potentials inDendroctonus frontalis: Effects oftrans-verbenol and verbenone.Experientia 34:463–464.Google Scholar
  6. Dixon, W.N., andPayne, T.L. 1979. Sequence of arrival and spatial distribution of entomophagous and associate insects of southern pine beetle-infested trees. Texas Agri. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ. 1432. 28 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, W.N., andPayne, T.L. 1980. Attraction of entomophagous and associate insects of the southern pine beetle to beetle- and host tree-produced volatiles.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 15:378–389.Google Scholar
  8. Godbee, J.F., Jr., andFranklin, R.T. 1976. Attraction, attack pattern and seasonal activity of the black turpentine beetle.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:653–655.Google Scholar
  9. Hedden, R., Vité, J.P., andMori, K. 1976. Synergistic effect of a pheromone and a kairomone on host selection and colonization byIps avulsus.Nature 261:696–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera).Can. Entomol. 115:299–302.Google Scholar
  11. McCarty, F.A., Billings, P.M., Richerson, J.V., Payne, T.L., andEoson, L.J. 1980. Response of the southern pine beetle to behavioral chemicals in the laboratory.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 15:307–317.Google Scholar
  12. Paine, T.D., Birch, M.C., andSvihra, P. 1981. Niche breadth and resource partitioning by four sympatric species of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Oecologia 48:1–6.Google Scholar
  13. Payne, T.L. 1970. Electrophysiological investigations on response to pheromones in bark beetles.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:275–282.Google Scholar
  14. Payne, T.L. 1971. Bark Beetle Olfaction 1. Electroantennogram responses of the southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone frontalin.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64:266–268.Google Scholar
  15. Payne, T.L. 1974. Pheromone and host odor-stimulated potentials inDendroctonus.Experientia 30:509–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Payne, T.L. 1975. Bark beetle olfaction. III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofDendroctonus frantalis Zimmerman andD. brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons.J. Chem. Ecol. 1:233–242.Google Scholar
  17. Payne, T.L., andDickens, J.C. 1976. Adaptation to determine receptor system specificity in insect olfactory communication.J. Insect. Physiol. 22:1569–1572.Google Scholar
  18. Payne, T.L., Coster, J.E., Richerson, J.V., Edson, L.J., andHart, E.R. 1978. Field response of the southern pine beetle to behavioral chemicals.Environ. Entomol. 7:578–582.Google Scholar
  19. Payne, T.L., Richerson, J.V., Dickens, J.C., West, J.R., Mom, K., Berisford, C.W., Hed-Den, R.L., Vité, J.P., andBlum, M.S. 1982. Southern pine beetle: Olfactory receptor and behavior discrimination of enantiomers of the attractant pheromone frontalin.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:873–881.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, T.L., Billings, R.F., Delorme, J.D., Andryszak, N.A., Bartels, J., Francke, W., andVite, J.P. 1987. Kairomonal-pheromonal system in the black turpentine beetle,Dendroctonus terebrans (01.).J. Appl. Entomol. 103:15–22.Google Scholar
  21. Payne, T.L., Billings, R.F., Delorme, J.D., Andryszak, N.A., Bartels, J., Francke, W., andVité, J.P. 1987. Kairomonal-pheromonal system in the black turpentine beetle,Dendroctonus terebrans (01.).J. Appl. Entomol. 103:15–22.Google Scholar
  22. Payne, T.L., Andryszak, N.A., Wieser, H., Dixon, E.A., Ibrahim, N., andCoers, J. 1988. Antennal olfactory and behavioral response of southern pine beetle,Dendroctonus frontalis, to analogs of its aggregation pheromone frontalin.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1217–1225.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, T.W., Nation, J.L., Wilkinson, R.C., andFoltz, J.L. 1989. Secondary attraction and field activity of beetle-produced volatiles inDendroctonus terebrans.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1513–1533.Google Scholar
  24. Redlich, H., Bruns, W., Francke, W., Schurig, V., Payne, T.L., andVité, J.P. 1987. Chiral building units from carbohydrates-XIII. Identification of the absolute configuration of endobrevicomin fromDendroctonus frontalis and synthesis of both enantiomers fromd-ribose.Tetrahedron 43:2029–2034.Google Scholar
  25. Renwick, J.A.A. 1969. Chemische Faktoren in Aggregations-Verhalten einiger Borkenkäfer. Inaugural dissertation. Göttingen University.Google Scholar
  26. Renwick, J.A.A., andVité, J.P. 1969. Bark beetle attractants: Mechanism of colonization byDendroctonus frontalis.Nature 224:1222–1223.Google Scholar
  27. Renwick, J.A.A., andVité, J.P. 1970. Systems of chemical communication inDendroctonus.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:283–292.Google Scholar
  28. Renwick, J.A.A., andVité, J.P. 1972. Pheromones and host volatiles that govern aggregation of the six-spined engraver beetle,Ips calligraphus.J. Insect Physiol. 18:1215–1219.Google Scholar
  29. Richerson, J.V., andPayne, T.L. 1979. Effects of bark beetle inhibitors on landing and attack behavior of the southern pine beetle and beetle associates.Environ. Entomol. 8:360–364.Google Scholar
  30. Rudinsky, J.A. 1973. Multiple functions of the southern pine beetle pheromone verbenone.Environ. Entomol. 2:511–514.Google Scholar
  31. Rudinsky, J.A., Morgan, M.E., Libbey, L.M., andPutman, T.B. 1974. Antiaggregative-rivalry pheromone of the mountain pine beetle, and a new arrestant of the southern pine beetle.Environ. Entomol. 3:90–98.Google Scholar
  32. Siegfried, B.D., Fatzinger, C.W., Wilkinson, R.C., andNation, J.L. 1986. Inflight responses of the black turpentine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to individual monoterpenes, turpentine, and paraquat-treated slash pines.Environ. Entomol. 15:710–714.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, M.T., Busch, G.R., Payne, T.L., andDickens, J.C. 1988. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of three sympatric Ips species [Ips avulsus (Eichhoff),Ips calligraphus (Germar),Ips grandicollis (Eichhoff)], to intra- and interspecific behavioral chemicals.J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1289–1304.Google Scholar
  34. Sokal, R.R., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York. 859 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart, T.E., Plummer, E.L., McCandless, L.L., West, J.R., andSilverstein, R.M. 1977. Determination of enantiomer composition of several bicyclic ketal insect pheromone components.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:27–43.Google Scholar
  36. Svihra, P. 1982. Influence of opposite sex on attraction produced by pioneer sex of four bark beetle species cohabiting pine in the southern United States.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:373–378.Google Scholar
  37. Svihra, P., Paine, T.D., andBirch, M.C. 1980. Interspecific olfactory communications in southern pine beetles.Naturwissenschaften 67:518–519.Google Scholar
  38. Vité, J.P., andRenwick, J.A.A. 1971a. Inhibition of Dendroctonus frontalis response to frontalin by isomers of brevicomin.Naturwissenschaften 58:418–419.Google Scholar
  39. Vité, J.P., andRenwick, J.A.A. 1971b. Population aggregating pheromone in the bark beetle,Ips grandicollis.J. Insect Physiol. 17:1699–1704.Google Scholar
  40. Vité, J.P., Gara, R.I., andVon Scheller, H.D. 1964. Field observations on the response to attractants of bark beetles infesting southern pines.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22:461–470.Google Scholar
  41. Vité, J.P., Bakke, A., andRenwick, J.A.A. 1972. Pheromones inIps (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): occurrence and production.Can. Entomol. 104:1967–1975.Google Scholar
  42. Vité, J.P., Hedden, R., andMori, K. 1976.Ips grandicollis: Field response to the optically pure pheromone.Naturwissenschaften 63:43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Vité, J.P., Ohloff, G., andBillings, R.F. 1978. Pheromonal chirality and integrity of aggregation response in southern species of the bark beetleIps sp.Nature 272:817–818.Google Scholar
  44. Vité, J.P., Billings, R.F., Ware, C.W., andMori, K. 1985. Southern pine beetle: Enhancement or inhibition of aggregation response mediated by enantiomers of endo-brevicomin.Naturwissenschaften 72:99.Google Scholar
  45. Wagner, T.L.,Flamm, R.O., andCoulson, R.N. 1985. Strategies for cohabitation among the southern pine beetle species: Comparisons of life-process biologies, pp. 87–101, in S.J. Branhame and R. C. Thatcher (eds.). Integrated Pest Management Research Symposium: The Proceedings, U.S.D.A.-F.S., S. For. Expt. Stn., N.D., L.A., General Tech. Rep. SO-56. 383 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Werner, R.A. 1972. Response of the beetle,Ips grandicollis, to combinations of host and insect produced attractants.J. Insect Physiol. 18:1403–1412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Smith
    • 1
  • T. L. Payne
    • 1
  • M. C. Birch
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations