European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 277–280 | Cite as

Treatment of chronic urticaria with terfenadine and ranitidine

A randomized double-blind study in 45 patients
  • E. Paul
  • R. H. Bödeker
Originals

Summary

45 patients with chronic urticaria were randomized to double blind therapy with terfenadine an H1-antihistamine or ranitidine, an H2-antihistamine, or a combination of both drugs. The therapeutic response was assessed by diary scores. The primary effect variable was “itching”. The inference-statistical evaluation of the patient scores showed varying therapeutic effects. The Type-I error wasp=0.015. Itching was reported to be significantly lower by patients receiving both drugs than by those who were given terfenadine alone, while ranitidine in monotherapy had no significant effect on itching. A similar trend was seen in assessment of the severity of weals, while the treatment regimens had no influence on swelling.

Key words

urticaria terfenadine ranitidine randomized double-blind study therapeutic response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greaves MW, Marks R, Robertson I (1977) Receptors for histamine in human skin blood vessels. A review. Br J Dermatol 97: 225–228Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robertson J, Greaves MW (1978) Response of human skin blood vessels to synthetic histamine analogues. Br J Clin Pharmacol 5: 319–322Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fermont DC, Haggie SJ, Wyllie JH (1976) Histamine receptors in human skin, abstracted. Br J Surg 63: 160Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies MG, Marks R, Horton RJ, Storari FE (1979) The efficacy of histamine antagonists as antipruritics in experimentally induced pruritus. Arch Dermatol Res 266: 117–120Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harvey RP, Schocket AL (1981) The effect of H1- and H2-blockade on cutaneous histamine response in man. J Allergy Clin Immunol 65: 136–139Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Commens CA, Greaves MW (1978) Cimetidine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized double-blind study. Br J Dermatol 99: 675–679Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phanuphak P, Schocket AL, Kohler PF (1978) Treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria with combined H1- and H2-blockers. Clinical Allergy 8: 429–433Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook J, Shuster S (1979) Lack of effect of H2-blockade in chronic urticaria. Br J Dermatol 101 [Suppl 17]: 21–22Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaiser HB, Weisberg SC, Morris RJ (1980) Cimetidine in chronic urticaria. Lancet 2: p 206Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harvey RP, Wegs J, Schocket AL (1981) A controlled trial of therapy in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 68: 262–266Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Monroe EW, Cohen SH, Kalbfleisch J, Schulz CJ (1981) Combined H1 and H2 antihistamine therapy in chronic urticaria. Arch Dermatol 117: 404–407Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyle J, MacKie RM (1982) The use of combined H1 and H2 receptor blockers in urticaria with dermographism. Br J Dermatol 107 [Suppl 22]: 18Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matthews CNA, Boss JM, Warin RP, Storari F (1969) The effect of H1 and H2-histamine antagonists on symptomatic dermographism. Br J Dermatol 101: 57–61Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaur S, Greaves MW, Eftekhari N (1981) Factitious urticaria (dermographism): treatment by cimetidine and chlorpheniramine in a randomized double-blind study. Br J Dermatol 104: 185–190Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mansfield LE, Smith JA, Nelson HS (1983) Greater inhibition of dermographia with a combination of H1- and H2-antagonists. Ann Allergy 50: 264–265Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Domschke S, Domschke W (1982) Modifizierte H2-Rezeptorenblockade in der Ulcustherapie. Eine Standortbestimmung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 107: 1827–1830Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schichtl H (1982) Ulkus-Therapie: Auch H2-Rezeptorenblocker sind noch entwicklungsfähig. Med Klin 77: 62–66Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anonymously (1982) Ranitidin (Sostril, Zantic). BGA fordert zusätzliche Hinweise bei Nebenwirkungen. Dtsch Apotheker Zeitung 41: 2150Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anonymously (1982) Ranitidin (Sostril, Zantic) im Vergleich mit Cimetidine (Tagamet). Arznei-Telegramm 10: 86–89Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dixon GT, Fowler PA, Maconochie JG (1981) Preclinical volunteer studies with ranitidine. In: Misiewicz JJ, Wormsley KG (eds) The clinical use of ranitidine. Medicine Publications Found, Oxford, pp 11–17Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greaves MW (1981) Antihistamine treatment: a patient self-assessment method in chronic urticaria. Br Med J 283: 1435–1436Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matthews KP (1981) Management of urticaria and angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol 66: 347–357Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Angeles DA, Solamon MO (1981) Cimetidine: Clinical trial in 30 patients with chronic urticaria. Allergia 28: 47–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Paul
    • 1
  • R. H. Bödeker
    • 2
  1. 1.Zentrum für Dermatologie und Andrologie (Hautklinik)Justus Liebig-Universität GiessenGiessenFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Institut für Medizinische InformatikJustus Liebig-Universität GiessenGiessenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations