Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) has been studied during the early postoperative period in 40 ASA I–III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 abdominal and 20 orthopaedic operations). Doses of 3.7 mg of the new agonist-antagonist opiod analgesic nalbuphine were available on demand, whenever the patients felt that pain relief was necessary, delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC) in response to use of a patient-controlled manual switch. The maximum dose/h was set at 28.2 mg, with a refractory time of 1 minute between successful demands. A continuous nalbuphine infusion (0.44 mg·h−1) was administered in addition in order to prevent obstruction of the catheter.

The duration of the PCA period was 17.9 (0.4–28.0) h (median, range). During that time, 13.3 (1–45) demands per patient were recorded, resulting in median individual nalbuphine consumptions of 51.3 (8.1–1050.5) µg·kg−1·h−1. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. Following abdominal surgery significantly more nalbuphine was needed compared to orthopaedic patients, but it resulted in poorer pain relief. There were no statistically significant differences in drug requirements or pain scores between the sexes.

Overall efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be good. When compared with previous conventional postoperative analgesia, the effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 57% of patients. Side effects (nausea, sweating) occured in about 10% of patients but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the period of PCA.

Patient-controlled analgesia is a promising technique for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alon E, Krayer S, Hossli G (1984) Analgesie und Nebenwirkungen von Nalbuphin (Nubain) im Vergleich zu Morphin nach Hysterektomie. Anaesthesist 33: 360–362

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angell M (1982) The quality of mercy. N Engl J Med 306: 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beaver WT, Feise GA (1978) A comparison of the analgesic effect of intramuscular nalbuphine and morphine in patients with postoperative pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 204: 487–496

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beaver WT, Feise GA, Robb D (1981) Analgesic effect of intramuscular and oral nalbuphine in postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 174–180

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beaver WT (1983) Measurement of analgesic efficacy in man. In: Bonica JJ (ed) Advances in pain research and therapy, vol 5. Raven Press, New York, pp 411–434

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett RL, Griffen WO (1983) Patient controlled analgesia. Contemp Surg 23: 75–89

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bikhazi GB (1978) Comparison of morphine and nalbuphine in postoperative pediatric patients. Anesthesiol Rev 5: 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cronin M, Redfern PA, Utting JE (1973) Psychometry and postoperative complaints in surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 45: 879–886

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlström B, Tamsen A, Paalzow L, Hartvig P (1982) Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, part IV: Pharmacokinetics and analgesic plasma concentrations of morphine. Clin Pharmacokinet 7: 266–279

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donovan BD (1983) Patient attitudes to postoperative pain relief. Anaesth Intensive Care 11: 125–129

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engalla JM, Jimenez H, Alejandro E (1982) Intramuscular nalbuphine HCl for the control of postoperative somatic pain. Phil J Obstet Gynecol 6: 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  12. Errick JK, Heel RC (1983) Nalbuphine. A preliminary report of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 26: 191–211

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fahmy NR (1980) Nalbuphine in “balanced” anesthesia: Its analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic effects. Anesthesiology 53: S66

  14. Fragen RJ, Caldwell N (1977) Acute intravenous premedication with nalbuphine. Anesth Analg 56: 808–812

    Google Scholar 

  15. Freye E, Hartung E, Segeth M (1984). Nalbuphine reverses fentanyl-related EEG-changes in man. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 35: 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gal TI, DiFazio CA, Moscicki I (1982) Analgesic and respiratory depressant activity of nalbuphine: a comparison with morphine. Anesthesiology 57: 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibbs JM, Johnson HD, Davis FM (1982) Patient administration of i.v. buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief using the “Cardiff” demand analgesia apparatus. Br J Anaesth 54: 279–284

    Google Scholar 

  18. Houde RW, Wallenstein SL, Beaver WT (1965) Clinical measurement of pain. In: George DS (ed) Analgesics. Academic Press, New York, pp 75–122

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jasinski DR, Masky PA (1972) Evaluation of nalbuphine for abuse potential. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 78–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joyce CRB, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM (1975) Comparison of fixed intervals and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 415–420

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kay B (1983) On-demand nalbuphine for post-operative pain. Anaesthesist 32 [Suppl]: 366–367

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kay B (1984) Patient-controlled analgesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 31: 120–121

    Google Scholar 

  23. Keeri-Szanto M (1979) Drugs or drums: What relieves postoperative pain? Pain 6: 217–230

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lake CL, Duckworth EN, DiFazio CA, Magruder MR (1984) Cardiorespiratory effects of nalbuphine and morphine premedication in adult cardiac surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 28: 305–309

    Google Scholar 

  25. Latasch L, Probst S, Dudziak R (1984) Reversal by nalbuphine of respiratory depression caused by fentanyl. Anesth Analg 63: 814–816

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lehmann KA, Gensior J, Daub D (1982) “Analgetische” Fentanyl-Blutkonzentrationen unter Neuroleptanalgesie. Anaesthesist 31: 655–659

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann KA, Neubauer ML, Daub D, Kalff G (1983) CO2-Antwortkurven als Maß für eine opiatbedingte Atemdepression. Untersuchungen mit Fentanyl. Anaesthesist 32: 242–258

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann KA (1984) On-Demand Analgesie: Neue Möglichkeiten zur Behandlung akuter Schmerzen. Arzneimittelforsch 34: 1108–1114

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lehmann KA, Gördes B, Hoeckle W (1985) Postoperative On-Demand Analgesie mit Morphin. Anaesthesist 34: 494–501

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lehmann KA, Tenbuhs B, Hoeckle W (1985) Postoperative On-Demand Analgesie mit Pentazocin (Fortral). Langenbecks Arch Chir 367: 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loan WB, Dundee JW (1967) The clinical assessment of pain. Practioner 198: 759–768

    Google Scholar 

  32. Loan WB, Morrison JD (1967) The incidence and severity of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 39: 695–698

    Google Scholar 

  33. Magruder MR, Delaney RD, DiFazio CA (1982) Reversal of narcotic-induced respiratory depression with nalbuphine hydrochloride. Anesthesiol Rev 9: 34–37

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marks RM, Sachar EJ (1973) Undertreatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics. Ann Int Med 78: 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  35. Masson AHB (1967) The role of analgesic drugs in the treatment of postoperative pain. Br J Anesth 39: 713–720

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mather LE (1983) Importance of blood concentrations of narcotics: Basis of understanding, controlling, and individualizing therapy. In: Bonica JJ (ed) Advances in pain research and therapy, vol 5, Raven Press, New York, pp 461–466

    Google Scholar 

  37. Miller RR (1980) Evaluation of nalbuphine hydrochloride. Am J Hosp Pharm 37: 942–949

    Google Scholar 

  38. Murphy MR, Hug CC (1982) The enflurane sparing effect of morphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine. Anesthesiology 57: 489–492

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nayman J (1979) Measurement and control of postoperative pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 61: 419–426

    Google Scholar 

  40. Okun R (1982) Analgesic effects of oral nalbuphine and codeine in patients with postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 32: 517–524

    Google Scholar 

  41. Papper EM, Brodie BB, Rovenstine EA (1952) Postoperative pain; its use in the comparative evaluation of analgesics. Surgery 32: 107–109

    Google Scholar 

  42. Parbrook GD, Steel DF, Dalrymple DG (1973) Factors predisposing to postoperative pain and pulmonary complications. A study of male patients undergoing elective gastric surgery. Br J Anaesth 45: 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Parkhouse J, Lambrechts W, Simpson BRJ (1961) The incidence of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 33: 345–353

    Google Scholar 

  44. Parkhouse J, Holmes CM (1963) Assessing post-operative pain relief. Proc R Soc Med 56: 579–583

    Google Scholar 

  45. Peeters M, Brugmans J (1980) Postoperative pain relief by demand analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 31 [Suppl]: 233–237

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pflug AE (1977) Physiopathology and control of postoperative pain. Arch Surg 112: 773–781

    Google Scholar 

  47. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31: 1191–1198

    Google Scholar 

  48. Romagnoli A, Keats AS (1980) Ceiling effect of respiratory depression by nalbuphine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27: 478–485

    Google Scholar 

  49. Scott J, Huskisson EC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2: 175–184

    Google Scholar 

  50. Scott LE, Clum GA, Peoples JB (1983) Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain. Pain 15: 283–293

    Google Scholar 

  51. Smith JM, Utting JE (1976) Postoperative pain. Br Med J 2: 875

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sprigge JS, Otton PE (1983) Nalbuphine versus meperidine for postoperative analgesia: a double-blind comparison using the patient controlled analgesic technique. Can Anaesth Soc J 30: 517–521

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stapleton JV, Austin KL, Mather LE (1979) A pharmacokinetic approach to postoperative pain: Continuous infusion of pethidine. Anaesth Intensive Care 7: 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stambaugh JE (1982) Evaluation of nalbuphine. Efficacy and safety in the management of chronic pain associated with advanced malignancy. Curr Ther Res 31: 393–400

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sulit BNM (1982) Intravenous nalbuphine hydrochloride for the control of post-operative somatic pain among filipinos. Phil J Anesth 6: 2–9

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sunshine A, Zighelboim I, de Sarrazin C, de Castro A (1983) A study of the analgesic efficacy of nalbuphine hydrochloride in patients with postpartum pain. Curr Ther Res 33: 108–114

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tammisto T, Tigerstedt I (1977) Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous nalbuphine and pentazocine in patients with postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 21: 390–394

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tammisto T, Tigerstedt I (1982) Narcotic analgesics in postoperative pain relief in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 74 [Suppl]: 161–164

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tamsen A, Hartvig P, Fagerlund C, Dahlström B, Bondesson U (1982) Patient-controlled analgesic therapy: Clinical experience. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 74 [Suppl]: 157–160

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wallace PGM, Norris W (1975) The management of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 47: 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  61. Waye JD, Braunfeld SF (1982) A randomized double-blind study of nalbuphine as an analgesic for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 28: 86–87

    Google Scholar 

  62. Weis OF, Sriwatanakul K, Alloza JL, Weintraub M, Lasagna L (1983) Attitudes of patients, housestaff, and nurses toward postoperative analgesic care. Anesth Analg 62: 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  63. White DC (1982) The relief of postoperative pain. In: Atkinson RS, Hewer CL (eds) Recent advances in anaesthesia and analgesia. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, New York, pp 121–139

    Google Scholar 

  64. Woodforde JM, Merskey H (1972) Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res 16: 173–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany

    K. A. Lehmann

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, RWTH, Aachen, Federal Republic of Germany

    B. Tenbuhs

Authors
  1. K. A. Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Tenbuhs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, K.A., Tenbuhs, B. Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 31, 267–276 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00981122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00981122

Key words

Search

Navigation