Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 215–224 | Cite as

Men who batter women: A study in power

  • Jacalyn A. Claes
  • David M. Rosenthal
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between a batterer's perception of his partner's power and the severely of violent tactics. Subjects for this study were 21 males, who had been arrested for domestic assault. Batterers whose educational level was higher than their partners used more severity violent tactics in assault. A correlation was found between reward power and severity of abuse, indicating that batterers perceive their partners as having a high ability to reward.

Key words

spouse abuse power male batterers domestic violence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bograd, M. (1984). Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 54: 558–568.Google Scholar
  2. Browning, J., and Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the conflict tactics scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect.J. Man. Fam. 48: 375–379.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, B. (1977). Battered women and their assailants.Social Work 22: 455–460.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, K. H. (1980). Conjugal violence: What 33 men report.J. Marit. Fam. Ther. 6: 207–213.Google Scholar
  5. deTurck, M. A. and Miller, G. R. (1986). The effects of husbands' and wives' social cognition on their marital adjustment, conjugal power, and self-esteem.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 715–724.Google Scholar
  6. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1978). Wives: The appropriate victims of marital violence.Victimology 2: 426–441.Google Scholar
  7. Edleson, J. L., and Brygger, M. P. (1984).Gender Differences in Reporting of Battering Incidences, Paper presented at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  8. Forsstrom-Cohen, B., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1985). The effects of parental marital violence on young adults: An exploratory investigation.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 467–472.Google Scholar
  9. Garrison, J., and Pate, L. (1977). Toward development and measurement of the interpersonal power construct.J. Psychol. 97: 95–106.Google Scholar
  10. Gelles, R. G. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies.J. Marr. Fam. 47: 467–472.Google Scholar
  11. Gottman, J. M. and Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 47–52.Google Scholar
  12. Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A., Stockard, J., and Bohmer, S. (1987). Learning courtship aggression: The influence of parents, peers, and personal experiences.Fam. Relat. 36: 276–282.Google Scholar
  13. Hanks, S. E., and Rosenbaum, C. P. (1977). Battered women: A study of women who live with violent alcohol abusing men.Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 47: 291–306.Google Scholar
  14. Herrenkohl, R., Herrenkohl, L., and Toedter, L. (1983). Perspectives on the intergenerational transmission of abuse. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A., (eds.),The Dark Side of Families, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, (pp. 305–316.)Google Scholar
  15. Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., and Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse.J. Marr. Fam. 7: 675–692.Google Scholar
  16. Jouriles, E. N. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 419–421.Google Scholar
  17. Kalmuss, D. (1984). The intergenerational transmission of marital aggression.J. Marr. Fam. 46: 11–19.Google Scholar
  18. McNeely, R. L., and Robinson-Simpson, G. (1987). The truth about domestic violence: A falsely framed issue.Social Work, 485–490.Google Scholar
  19. O'Brien, J. (1974). Violence in divorce prone families.J. Marr. Fam. 33: 692–698.Google Scholar
  20. Pagelow, M. (1979). Research on woman battering. In Jennifer Baker-Fleming (ed.),Stopping Wife Abuse, Anchor-Doubleday, Garden City, N. Y.Google Scholar
  21. Purdy, F., and Nickle, N. (1981). Practice principles for working with groups of men who batter.Social Work Groups, 4: 111–112.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1986). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 63–71.Google Scholar
  23. Roy, M. (1977). A current survey of 150 cases. In Maria Roy (ed.),Battered Women, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
  24. Schecter, S. (1982).Women and Male Violence, South End Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  25. Skznovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 633–644.Google Scholar
  26. Sonkin, D. J., Martin, D., and Walker, L. (1985).The Male Batterer. A Treatment Approach, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Star, B. (1983).Helping the Abuser, Family Service Association of America, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Star, B., Clark, C. G., Goetz, K. M., and O'Hara, C. (1979). Psychosocial aspects of wife battering.Social Casework, 41: 479–487.Google Scholar
  29. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). The battered husband syndrome.Victimology, 2: 499–509.Google Scholar
  30. Straus, M. (1964). Measuring families. In Harold T. Christensen (ed.),Handbook of Marriage and the Family, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Straus, M. (1974). Leveling, civility, and violence in the family.Victimology 1: 13–29.Google Scholar
  32. Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.Google Scholar
  33. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor-Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Straus, M. A. (1981).A reevaluation of the Conflict Tactics Scale violence measures and some new measures. Paper presented at the National Conference on Family Violence Research, University of New Hampshire, July 21–25, 1981.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, M. (1987).The Conflict Tactic Scales: An evaluation and new data on validity, reliability,norms and scoring methods. Paper presented at the 1987 meeting of the National Council on Family Relations.Google Scholar
  36. Straus, M., and Gelles, R. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 465–479.Google Scholar
  37. Walker, L. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, L. (1978). Battered women and learned helplessness.Victimol. Int. J. 2: 525–534.Google Scholar
  39. Wardell L., Gillespie, D., and Leffler, A. (1983). Science and violence against wives. In D. Finkelhoret al. (ed.),The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research, Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  40. Watts, D. L., and Courtois, C. A. (1981). Trends in the treatment of men who commit violence against women.Person. Guid. J. 60: 245–249.Google Scholar
  41. Weitzman, J., and Dreen, K. (1982). Wifebeating: A view of the marital dyad.Social Casework, 63: 259–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacalyn A. Claes
    • 1
  • David M. Rosenthal
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of LouisvilleLouisville
  2. 2.The University of IowaIowa City

Personalised recommendations