Abstract
Responses ofRhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies to host fruit visual stimuli (apples or models of apples) and chemical stimuli (synthetic apple volatile blend) were studied in semidwarf field-caged apple trees. Three different fruit or model densities (1, 4, or 16 fruit or models/ tree) and two odor release rates [ca. 0.7μg/hr (close to the natural release rate of a ripe apple) and ca. 500μg/hr (amount of odor released by commercially sold apple maggot traps)] were tested. Individually released flies were followed as they moved within a tree for a maximum of 20 min. We recorded three-dimensional search paths followed by foraging flies and computed such variables as total relative distance traveled before alighting on a fruit or model, track length between individual alightment sites, and directness of flight to fruits or models. Effect of odor on propensity to alight on fruit or models and host-searching behavior prior to alighting on fruit or on models varied according to fruit or model color and density. If the fruit visual stimulus was strong (e.g., red color), odor did not increase the probability of finding fruit or fruit models. As the visual stimulus became progressively weaker (red to green to clear), odor (irrespective of concentration) appeared to aid flies during the fruit-finding process. As density of fruit or models increased, the probability of flies finding a fruit or model also increased (e.g., 50% of flies found a red fruit model at 1 model/tree while 90% found a red model at 16 models/tree; 4% of flies found a clear model with odor at 1 model/tree while 35% found a clear model with odor at 16 models/tree). Findings reported elsewhere indicate thatR. pomonella flies are able to discover a point source of odor (an odor-bearing tree in a patch of trees) by flying upwind (in the tree patch) in response to intermittent exposure to odor. Findings here indicate that after arrival on a host tree (point source), flies discover individual apparent and abundant host fruit on the basis of vision. If fruit are less apparent or scarce, odor appears to interact with vision during the fruit-finding process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agee, H.R. 1985. Spectral response of the compound eye of the wild and laboratory-reared apple maggot fly,Rhagoletis pomonella.J. Agric. Entomol. 2:147–154.
Agnello, A.M., Spangler, S.M., andReissig, W.H. 1990. Development and evolution of a more efficient monitoring system for apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 83:539–546.
Aluja, M., andProkopy, R.J. 1992. Host search behaviour byRhagoletis pomonella flies: Intertree movement patterns in response to wind-borne fruit volatiles under field conditions.Physiol. Entomol. 17:1–8.
Aluja, M., Prokopy, R.J., Elkinton, J.S., andLaurence, F. 1989. Novel approach for tracking and quantifying the movement patterns of insects in three dimensions under seminatural conditions.Environ. Entomol. 18:1–7.
Aluja, M., Prokopy, R.J., Buonaccorsi, J.P., andCardé, R.T. 1993. Wind tunnel assays of olfactory responses ofRhagoletis pomonella flies to wind-borne apple volatiles.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 68:99–108.
Averill, A.L., Reissig, W.H., andRoelofs, W.L. 1988. Specificity of olfactory responses in the tephritid fruit fly,Rhagoletis pomonella.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47:211–222.
BMDP 1987. BMDP Statistical Software Version 87. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Miller, D.R., andSlessor, K.N. 1986. Orientation in forest Coleoptera: An uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli, pp. 97–109,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Brady, J., Packer, M.J., andGibson, G. 1990. Odour plume shape and host finding by tsetse.Insect Sci. Applic. 11:377–384.
Fein, B.L., Reissig, W.H., andRoelofs, W.L. 1982. Identification of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot,Rhagoletis pomonella.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1473–1487.
Gibson, G., Packer, M.J., Steullet, P., andBrady, J. 1991. Orientation of tsetse flies to wind, within and outside host odour plumes in the field.Physiol. Entomol. 16:47–56.
Green, C.H. 1986. Effects of colours and synthetic odours on the attraction ofGlossina pallidipes andG. morsitans morsitans to traps and screens.Physiol. Entomol. 11:411–421.
Harris, M.O., andMiller, J.R. 1983. Color stimuli and oviposition behavior of the onion fly,Delia antiqua (Meigen).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:766–771.
Harris, M.O., andMiller, J.O. 1991. Quantitative analysis of ovipositional behavior: Effects of a host-plant chemical on the onion fly (Diptera: Anthomyiidae).J. Insect Behav. 4:773–792.
Judd, G.J. 1986. Integration of visual and olfactory host-finding mechanisms in the onion maggot,Delia antiqua (Meigen) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). PhD dissertation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.
Kogan, M. 1977. The role of chemical factors in insect/plant interactions.Proc. Int. Congr. Entomol., Washington D. C. 1976:211–227.
Moericke, V., Prokopy, R.J., Berlocher, S., andBush, G.L. 1975. Visual stimuli eliciting attraction ofRhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies to trees.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 13:524–534.
Oatman, E.R. 1964. Apple maggot trap and attractant studies.J. Econ. Entomol. 57:529–531.
Owens, E.D. 1982. The effects of hue, intensity and saturation on foliage and fruit finding in the apple maggot. PhD thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Owens, E.D., andProkopy, R.J. 1984. Habitat background characteristics influencingRhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Dipt., Tephritidae) fly response to foliar and fruit mimic traps.Z. Angew. Entomol. 98:98–103.
Owens, E.D., andProkopy, R.J. 1986. Relationship between reflectance spectra of host plant surfaces and visual detection of host fruit byRhagoletis pomonella flies.Physiol. Entomol. 11:297–307.
Payne, T.L. 1986. Olfaction and vision in host finding by a bark beetle, pp. 112–116,in T.L. Payne, M.C. Birch, and C.E.J. Kennedy (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Prokopy, R.J. 1968. Visual responses of apple maggot flies,Rhagoletis pomonella: Orchard studies.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11:403–422.
Prokopy, R.J. 1973. Dark enamel spheres capture as many apple maggot flies as fluorescent spheres.Environ. Entomol. 2:953–954.
Prokopy, R.J. 1975. Apple maggot control by sticky red spheres.J. Econ. Entomol. 68:197–198.
Prokopy, R.J. 1977. Attraction ofRhagoletis flies to red spheres of different sizes.Can. Entomol. 109:593–596.
Prokopy, R.J. 1986. Visual and olfactory stimulus interaction in resource finding by insects, pp. 81–89,in T.L. Payne et al., (eds.). Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Prokopy, R.J. 1991. A small low-input commercial apple orchard in eastern North America: management and economics.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 33:353–362.
Prokopy, R.J., andOwens, E.D. 1978. Visual generalist and visual specialist phytophagous insects: Host selection behaviour and application to management.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:409–420.
Prokopy, R.J., andOwens, E.D. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28:337–364.
Prokopy, R.J., Moericke, V., andBush, G.L. 1973. Attraction of apple maggot flies to odor of apples.Environ. Entomol. 2:743–749.
Prokopy, R.J., Johnson, S.A., andO'brien, M.T. 1990. Second-stage integrated management of apple arthropod pests.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54:9–19.
Reissig, W.H. 1974. Field tests of the response ofRhagoletis pomonella to apples.Environ. Entomol. 3:733–736.
Reissig, W.H., Fein, B.L., andRoelofs, W.L. 1982. Field tests of synthetic apple volatiles as apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) attractants.Environ. Entomol. 11:1294–1298.
Reissig, W.H., Weires, R.W., Forshey, C.G., Roelofs, W.L., Lamb, R.C., Aldwinckle, H.S., andAlm, S.R. 1984. Management of the apple maggot,Rhagoletis pomonella, in disease resistant dwarf and semi-dwarf apple trees.Environ. Entomol. 13:684–690.
Reissig, W.H., Stanley, B.H., Roelofs, W.L., andSchwarz, M.R. 1985. Tests of synthetic apple volatiles in traps as attractants for apple maggot flies in commercial apple orchards.Environ. Entomol. 14:55–59.
Robert, P.C. 1986. Les relations plantes-insectes phytophages chez les femelles pondeuses: Le role des stimulus chimiques et physiques. Une mise au point bibliographique.Agronomie 6:127–142.
Roitberg, B.D. 1985. Search dynamics in fruit-parasitic insects.J. Insect Physiol. 31:865–872.
Saxena, K.N., andSaxena, R.C. 1975. Patterns of relationships between certain leafhoppers and plants, Part III. Range and interaction of sensory stimuli.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 18:194–206.
Sokal, R.F., andRohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 859 pp.
Swift, F.C. 1982. Field tests of visual and chemical lures for apple maggot flies.J. Econ. Entomol. 75:201–206.
Todd, J.L., Phelan, P.L., andNault, L.R. 1990. Interaction between visual and olfactory stimuli during host-finding by leafhopper,Dalbulus maidis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2121–2133.
Torr, S.J. 1988. The activation of resting tsetse flies (Glossina) in response to visual and olfactory stimuli in the field.Physiol. Entomol. 13:315–325.
Torr, S.J. 1989. The host-orientated behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina): The interaction of visual and olfactory stimuli.Physiol. Entomol. 14:325–340.
Weatherston, I., Miller, D., andDohse, L. 1985a. Capillaries as controlled release devices for insect pheromones and other volatile substances-a reevaluation Part I. Kinetics and development of predictive model for glass capillaries.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:953–965.
Weatherston, I., Miller, D., andLavoie-Dornik, J. 1985b. Capillaries as controlled release devices for insect pheromones and other volatile substances—a reevaluation Part II. Predicting release rates from Celcon and Teflon capillaries.J. Chem. Ecol. 11:967–978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aluja, M., Prokopy, R.J. Host odor and visual stimulus interaction during intratree host finding behavior ofRhagoletis pomonella flies. J Chem Ecol 19, 2671–2696 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980700
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980700


