Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 3017–3027 | Cite as

Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini)

  • W. Mark Whitten
  • Allen M. Young
  • David L. Stern
Article

Abstract

We present chemical analysis of four rotten or fungus-infected logs that attracted fragrance-collecting male euglossine bees. Eight of the 10 volatile compounds detected have never been found in the fragrances of orchids pollinated by male euglossine bees. Nonfloral sources of chemicals such as rotting wood may constitute an important fragrance resource for male bees. Since rotten logs produce large quantities of chemicals over long periods of time, such nonfloral sources might be more important than flowers as a source of certain fragrances for some euglossine bee species. Fragrance collecting in euglossine bees might have evolved originally in relation with rotting wood rather than flowers.

Key Words

Hymenoptera Apidae Euglossini floral fragrance fungi skatole chemical ecology orchid rotting wood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, J.D. 1983. Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20:301–314.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, J.D. 1985. Euglossine bees and their nectar hosts, pp. 225–233,in W.G. D'Arcy and M.D. Correa (eds.). The Botany and Natural History of Panama. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, J.D. 1989. Geographic and seasonal variation in fragrance choices and preferences of male euglossine bees.Biotropica 21:340–347.Google Scholar
  4. Ausloos, P., Clifton, C., Lias, S.G., Shamim, A., Stein, S.E. 1992. NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Database, PC Version 4.0. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.Google Scholar
  5. Dodson, C.H. 1975. Coevolution of orchids and bees, pp. 91–99,in L.E. Gilbert and P.H. Raven (eds.). Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  6. Dressler, R.L. 1967. Why do euglossine bees visit orchid flowers?Atas Simpo. Sobre Biota Amazon. 5:171–180.Google Scholar
  7. Dressler, R.L. 1982. Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:373–394.Google Scholar
  8. Gerlach, G., andSchill, R. 1989. Fragrance analyses, an aid to taxonomic relationships of the genusCoryanthes (Orchidaceae).Plant Syst. Evol. 168:159–165.Google Scholar
  9. Gerlach, G., andSchill, R. 1991. Composition of orchid scents attracting euglossine bees.Bot. Acta 104:379–391.Google Scholar
  10. Janzen, D.H. 1971. Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants.Science 171:203–205.Google Scholar
  11. Janzen, D.H., De Vries, P.J., Higgins, M.L., andKimsey, L.S. 1981. Seasonal and site variation in Costa Rican euglossine bees at chemical baits in a deciduous forest and an evergreen forest.Ecology 63:66–74.Google Scholar
  12. Kaiser, R. 1993. The Scent of Orchids: Olfactory and Chemical Investigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 259 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Kiester, A.R., Lande, R., andSchemske, D.W. 1984. Models of coevolution and speciation in plants and their pollinators.Am. Nat. 124:220–243.Google Scholar
  14. Kimsey, L.S. 1980. The behaviour of male orchid bees (Apidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and the question of leks.Anim. Behav. 28:996–1004.Google Scholar
  15. Kimsey, L.S. 1982. Abstract. International Union for the Study of Social Insects Meetings at Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  16. Kimsey, L.S. 1984. The behavioral and structural aspects of grooming and related activities in euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Zool. 204:541–550.Google Scholar
  17. Lunau, K. 1992. Evolutionary aspects of perfume collection in male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera) and of nest deception in bee-pollinated flowers.Chemoecology 3:65–73.Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, D.R., Alecrim, W.D., Heller, J.M., Ehrhardt, S.R., andLima, J.B. 1982. MaleEufriesia purpurata, a DDT-collecting bee in Brazil.Nature 297:62–63.Google Scholar
  19. Roubik, D.W. 1989. Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 514 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Roubik, D.W., andAckerman, J.D. 1987. Long-term ecology of euglossine orchid-bees (Apidae: Euglossini) in Panama.Oecologia 73:321–333.Google Scholar
  21. Schemske, D.W., andLande, R. 1984. Fragrance collection and territorial display by male orchid bees.Anim. Behav. 32:935–937.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, B.N., andMeeuse, B.J.D. 1966. Production of volatile amines and skatole at anthesis in someArum lily species.Plant Physiol. 41:343–347.Google Scholar
  23. Stern, D.L. 1991. Male territoriality and alternative male behaviors in the euglossine beeEulaema meriana (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64:421–437.Google Scholar
  24. Tabacchi, R., andNicollier, G. 1979. Contribution to the knowledge of the chemical composition of oak moss (Evernia prunastri Ach.).Int. Congr. Essent. Oils 7:394–387. Japan Flavor Fragrance Manuf. Assoc. Tokyo.Google Scholar
  25. Whitten, W.M., Young, A.M., andWilliams, N.H. 1989. Function of glandular secretions in fragrance collection by male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini).J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1285–1295.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, N.H. 1982. The biology of orchids and euglossine bees. pp. 119–171in J. Arditti (ed.). Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives, II. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, N.H., andWhitten, W.M. 1983. Orchid floral fragrances and male euglossine bees: Methods and advances in the last sesquidecade.Biol. Bull. 164:355–395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Mark Whitten
    • 1
  • Allen M. Young
    • 2
  • David L. Stern
    • 3
  1. 1.Florida Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of FloridaGainesville
  2. 2.Milwaukee Public MuseumMilwaukee
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations