Conclusions
It is proposed to divide measuring instruments, from the point of view of automating their checking, into three basic groups, for each of which there is a typical technical solution. For each group there is also a characteristic degree of effectiveness due to the introduction of automation.
The greatest effectiveness can be expected from the automated checking of measuring instruments without scales, since the information from them can be applied directly to other instruments and there is no need for intermediate members such as readout and computing devices.
Complete automation of the checking of indicating instruments is desirable at the present time only for instruments of high accuracy classes (0.5 and higher), and when it is necessary to check 10 or more scale marks and to record the indications. As with SST, it is desirable first to introduce such automation in factories producing instruments.
For instruments of lower accuracy classes it is desirable to limit the automation of checking to the introduction of SST.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
S. M. Kessel'man and A. M. Kipnis, Izmeritel'. Tekh., No. 5 (1967).
A. M. Kipnis and I. I. Kogan, Élektropromyshlennost' i Priborostroenie, No. 19 (1960).
T. G. Serdobintseva, In Coll.: Mechanization and Automation of Assembly Work in Instrumentation [in Russian], GOSINTI, Moscow (1963).
A. Ya. Bezikovich, D. I. Zorin, and S. P. Éskin, Izmeritel'. Tekh., No. 11 (1967).
Additional information
The Editorial Staff invites readers to respond to this article.
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 3, pp. 59–61, March, 1968.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kipnis, A.M. Basic trends in automating checking work. Meas Tech 11, 366–368 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980334
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980334