Skip to main content
Log in

An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel evaluation approach for the selection of candidates for promotion and/or tenure. The decision problem is conceptualized as a hierarchy of factors and a mathematical procedure known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used for successively “weighting” or prioritizing factors at each level of the hierarchy, in order to arrive at a final composite set of weights for each potential candidate, listed as alternatives at the final level of the hierarchy. The procedure and its mathematical basis are explained and illustrated using hypothetical data. It is argued that the AHP can aid university decision makers in arriving at objective and consistent decisions on faculty tenure, which at present appear to be largely subjective and informal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Committee for Economic Development.The Management and Financing of Colleges. New York: CED, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolson, M. A. Criteria for promotion and tenure: A faculty view. Research Note,Academy of Management Journal 1974,17 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F.The Faculty Promotion Process. Iowa City, Iowa: Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Iowa, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevison, C. H. Effects of tenure and retirement policies on the college faculty.Journal of Higher Education 1980,51 No. 2, 150–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. Power and resource allocation in organizations. Chapter 7. In Barry M. Staw and Gerald R. Salancik (eds.),New Directions in Organizational Behavior. Chicago, Ill.: St. Clair Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remus, W. Strategies for a publish or perish world; or why journals are unreadable.Interfaces 1977,8 No. 1, 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., and Rogers, P. C. Higher education in the United States: 1985–2000.Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 1976,10 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., and Desai, A.The Faculty Tenure Problem-Determination and Requirements. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1977.

  • Simon, H. A. The architecture of complexity.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1962,106 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, B. J., and Miller, T. R. Selected personnel practices relating to research and publication among management faculty. Research Note,Academy of Management Journal 1976,19 No. 3, 502–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoffer, H. J. The consummate faculty person.Academy of Management Review, 1978, 901–906.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saaty, T.L., Ramanujam, V. An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process. Res High Educ 18, 311–331 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979603

Keywords

Navigation