Abstract
Quantum mechanics and its interpretation are connected in a manifold way by the measuring process. The measuring apparatus serve as a means for the verification of the theory and are considered as physical objects also subject to the Jaws of this theory. On the basis of this interrelation some parts of the interpretation can be derived from other parts by means of quantum theory. On the other hand there are interpretations which must be excluded on the basis of the quantum theory of measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beltrametti, E., Cassinelli, G., and Lahti, P. (1990). Unitary measurements of discrete quantities in quantum mechanics,Journal of Mathematical Physics,31, 91–98.
Busch, P., and Mittelstaedt, P. (1991). The problem of objectification in quantum mechanics,Foundations of Physics,21, 889–904.
Busch, P., Lahti, P., and Mittelstaedt, P. (1991).The Quantum Theory of Measurement, Springer, Berlin.
Busch, P., Lahti, P., and Mittelstaedt, P. (1992). Weak objectification, joint probabilities, and Bell inequalities in quantum mechanics,Foundations of Physics,22, 949–962.
Dalla Chiara, M. L. (1977). Logical self-reference, set theoretical paradoxes and the measurement problem in quantum mechanics,Journal of Philosophical Logic,6, 331–347.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1991). The objectification in the measuring process and the many-worlds interpretation, inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 261–279.
Peres, A., and Zurek, W. H. (1982). Is quantum theory universally valid?,American Journal of Physics,50(9), 807–810.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1979). Foundations of probability: A modal frequency interpretation, inProblems on the Foundations of Physics, G. Toraldo di Francia, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 344–394.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mittelstaedt, P. Quantum measurement I. The measuring process and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 32, 1763–1775 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979499
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979499