Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 61–80 | Cite as

The impact of stress on cognitive components of child abuse potential

  • Cynthia J. Schellenbach
  • Linda D. Monroe
  • Thomas V. Merluzzi
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to test the effects of situational stress on the components of the cognitive behavioral model, including expectations, interpretations, and behavioral responses to child behaviors (Twentyman et al., 1985). It was predicted that parental abuse potential would be positively related to inappropriate expectations, to negative and internally caused interpretations of child behavior, and to negative parental responses. Second, it was expected that interpretations and responses would be more negative as child abuse potential increased. Sixteen mothers from a child abuse prevention and treatment program completed the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (Milner and Wimberly, 1980) and provided interpretations, evaluations, and responses to a set of vignettes depicting normal child behaviors. The data supported the hypotheses. As abuse potential increased, parent responses were judged as more controlling, punishing, rejecting, and aroused. High stress strengthened the magnitude of these responses. These findings were interpreted within the context of a cognitive behavioral model.

Key words

stress child abuse potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayoub, C. and Pffeifer, D. R. (1977). An approach to primary prevention: The “At-Risk” Program.Children Today, 14–17.Google Scholar
  2. Ayoub, C., Jacewitz, M. M., Gold, R. G., and Milner, J. S. (1983). Assessment of a program's effectiveness in selecting individuals “At Risk” for problems in parenting.J. Clin. Psychol. 39: 334–339.Google Scholar
  3. Baver, W. D., and Twentyman, C. T. (1985). Abusing, neglectful, and comparison mothers' responses to child-related and non-child-related Stressors.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 335–343.Google Scholar
  4. Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration.Am. Psychologist 35: 320–335.Google Scholar
  5. Bousha, D. M., and Twentyman, C. T. (1984). Mother-child interactional style in abuse, neglect, and control groups: Naturalistic observations in the home.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 93: 106–114.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, R. L., Anderson, E. A., Schellenbach, C. J., and Conger, R. D. (1981). A social interactional approach to the study of abusive families. In Vincent, J. (ed.),Advances in Family Intervention, Assessment and Theory (Vol. 2), JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, R. L., and Conger, R. D. (1978). Family interaction in abusive, neglectful, and normal families.Child Devel. 49: 1163–1173.Google Scholar
  8. Delaney, H. D., and Maxwell, S. E. (1981). On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs.Multivar. Behav. Res., 16: 105–124.Google Scholar
  9. Disbrow, M. A., Doerr, H., and Caulfield, C. (1977). Measuring the components of parents' potential for child abuse and neglect.Child Abuse Negl. 1: 279–296.Google Scholar
  10. Egeland, Jacobvitz, D., and Sroufe, L. A. (1988). Breaking the cycle of abuse.Child Devel. 59: 1080–1088.Google Scholar
  11. Frodi, A. M. (1981). Contribution of infant characteristics to child abuse.Am. J. Ment. Def. 85: 341–349.Google Scholar
  12. Frodi, A. M. and Lamb, M. E. (1980). Child abusers' responses to infant smiles and cries.Child Devel. 51: 238–241.Google Scholar
  13. Fry, E. (1963).Teaching Faster Reading, Cambridge Press, London.Google Scholar
  14. Gaines, R., Sadgrund, A., Green, A. H., and Power, E. (1978). Etiological factors in child maltreatment: A multivariate study of abusing, neglecting, and normal mothers.J. Abnorm. Psychol., 87: 531–540.Google Scholar
  15. Garbarino, J. (1976) A preliminary study of some ecological correlates of child abuse: The impact of socioeconomic stress on mothers.Child Devel. 47: 178–185.Google Scholar
  16. Garbarino, J. (1977). The human ecology of child maltreatment. A conceptual model for research.J. Marr. Family 39: 721–736.Google Scholar
  17. Gelles, R. J. (1973). Child abuse as psychopathology: A sociological critique and reformulation,Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 43: 611–621.Google Scholar
  18. Gil, D. (1970).Violence Against Children: Physical Child Abuse in the United States, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Gottman, J. M. (1979).Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Herenkohl, R. C., Herenkohl, E. C., and Egolf, B. P. (1983). Circumstances surrounding the occurrence of child maltreatment.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51: 424–431.Google Scholar
  21. Kaufman, J., and Zigler, E. (1987). Do abused children become abusive parents?Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 47.Google Scholar
  22. Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemueller, W., and Silver, H. K. (1962). The battered-child syndrome.J. Am. Med. Assoc. 181: 17–24.Google Scholar
  23. Larrance, D. T., and Twentyman, C. T. (1983). Maternal attributions and child abuse.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92: 449–457.Google Scholar
  24. Melnick, B., and Hurley, J. R. (1969). Distinctive personality attributes of child-abusing mothers.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 33: 746–749.Google Scholar
  25. Milner, J. S. (1986).The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual (second edition), Psytec Corporation, Webster, N.C.Google Scholar
  26. Milner, J. S., and Ayoub, C. (1980). Evaluation of at-risk parents using the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.J. Clin. Psychol. 36: 945–948.Google Scholar
  27. Milner, J. S., Gold, R. G., Ayoub, C., and Jacewitz, M. M. (1984). Predictive validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 52: 879–884.Google Scholar
  28. Milner, J. S., and Wimberly, R. C. (1979). An inventory for the identification of child abusers.J. Clin. Psychol. 35: 95–100.Google Scholar
  29. Milner, J. S., and Wimberley, R. C. (1980). Prediction and explanation of child abuse.J. Clin. Psychol. 36: 875–884.Google Scholar
  30. Monroe, L., and Merluzzi, T. V. (1983).Parenting Situations Vignettes, Unpublished instrument. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind.Google Scholar
  31. Monroe, L., Merluzzi, T. V., and Schellenbach, C. J. (1984).Parental Expectations Questionnaire, Unpublished instrument, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind.Google Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. R. (1983).Coercive Family Process, Catalina Publishing, Eugene, Ore.Google Scholar
  33. Plotkin, R. C., and Twentyman, C. T. (1982). Unrealistic expectations of parents who maltreat their children: An educational deficit that pertains to development.J. Clin. Psychol. 38: 497–503.Google Scholar
  34. Spinetta, J. J., and Rigler, D. (1972). The child abusing parent: A psychological review.Psychological Bull. 77: 296–304.Google Scholar
  35. Steele, B. F., and Pollock, C. B. (1968). A psychiatric study of parents who abuse infants and small children. In Helfer, K. E., and Kemipe, C. H. (eds.),The Battered Child, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 89–133.Google Scholar
  36. Steinberg, L. D., Catalano, R., and Dooley, D. (1981). Economic antecedents of child abuse.Child Devel. 52: 975–985.Google Scholar
  37. Stringer, S. A., and LaGreca, A. M. (1985). Correlates of child abuse potential.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 13: 217–226.Google Scholar
  38. Trickett, P. K., and Kuczynski, L. (1986). Children's misbehaviors and parental discipline strategies in abusive and non-abusive families.Devel. Psychol. 22: 3–18.Google Scholar
  39. Twentyman, C. T., Rohrbeck, C. A., and Amish, P. L. (1985). A cognitive behavioral model of abuse. In Saunders, S. (ed.),Violent Individuals and Families: A Practitioner's Handbook, Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
  40. Vasta, R. (1982). Physical child abuse: A dual-component analysis.Devel. Rev. 2: 125–149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia J. Schellenbach
    • 1
  • Linda D. Monroe
    • 1
  • Thomas V. Merluzzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre Dame

Personalised recommendations