Abstract
To test how sex biases operate in the screening of candidates for administrative positions, an experimental study was conducted to evaluate the contribution of gender and career pattern effects on candidates' ratings. Faculty from seven universities were asked in a task that was judged to be realistic to evaluate vitae of six candidates for a deanship of a college of arts and sciences. Experimental design permitted alteration of the vitae to change gender and career patterns. No significant difference was found in the ratings assigned to male and female candidates. Career break did have a significant effect; candidates with career breaks received higher ratings on the average than those without career breaks. There was no significant interaction of gender and career break. Three different ratings systems were used, but none interacted with either gender or career break. However, closer examination of screeners' ratings did suggest that career experience was evaluated in different ways for male and female candidates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education.Making Affirmative Action Work in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
Davies, Helen C., and Davies, Robert E. Redress of grievances.Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 323 (April 1979).
Divine, Thomas M. Women in the academy: Sex discrimination in university faculty hiring and promotion.Journal of Law and Education, vol. 5 (October 1976).
Ekstrom, Ruth B. Issues in the recruitment, professional development, promotion, and remuneration of women faculty. Paper prepared for the Mary Donlon Alger Conference on Gateways and Barriers to Women in the University Community, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., September 11, 1976. Research Memorandum, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., 1978.
Fidell, Linda S. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology.American Psychologist, vol. 25 (1970).
Gappa, Judith M., and Uehling, Barbara S.Women in Academe: Steps to Greater Equality, ERIC/AAHE Report 1 (1979).
Hays, Garry D. Strategies for advancing women in higher education administration.Women (September 1978), Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
Kaplowitz, Richard A.,Selecting Academic Administrators: The Search Committee, American Council on Education, 1973.
Lewin, Arie Y., and Duchan, Linda. Women in academia.Science, vol. 175 (July–September 1971).
Lutz, Frank W. The deanship: Search and screening process.Educational Record, vol. 60 (Summer 1979).
Thornberry, Mary. Unexpected benefits, expected defeats: Affirmative action for women. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, 1978.
Vetter, Betty M. National needs for scientific manpower—projections and observations, Paper presented at Annual Meeting of Council of Colleges of Arts and Sciences, San Diego, 1979.
White, Barbara (ed.).President's Commission on the Status of Women Hiring Handbook, University of New Hampshire, 1980 (Mimeo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, D.R., Larsen, M.D. & Wadlow, J.K. Assessing sex and career biases in screening candidates for a deanship: An experimental study. Res High Educ 17, 363–374 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977903
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977903