Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How much role conflict is there in the job of university lecturer? An international comparison

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching members of two South African and two Nigerian universities were asked to rate the importance of four roles in their jobs; teaching, administration, research, and character building of students. The Nigerian lecturers rated teaching and character building as more important than did the South African lecturers, who rated research as more important than did the Nigerian lecturers. In both countries the emphasis on research was positively related to the prestige and size of the university; while that on teaching and character building was greater in both countries among lecturers in the humanities than among those in the natural sciences. The results are interpreted in the light of the growing conflict faced by lecturers between the research role (to secure promotion, tenure, and salary increments) and the teaching and character development roles (to satisfy students).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, G.Nigeria. London: Longman, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verelson, B.Graduate Education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandis, R. The rehabilitation of university undergraduate teaching.The Educational Record 1964,45 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., and McGee, R. J.The Academic Market Place. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R.Labour and Politics in Nigeria. London: Heinemann, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. C.Nigeria. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. Scientists at major and minor universities; a study of productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review 1965,30 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demachi, V.Nigerian Modernization. London: Cassell, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M.; Kanzer, P.; and Carr, R.Attitudes of Faculty to Student Power and Militancy. San Francisco: Francisco State College Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. D., and Villemez, W. The productivity of scholars at 45 American universities.American Sociologist 1970,5 244–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H., and Trow, M.The British Academics. London: Faber, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, R.The Political Economy of South Africa. London: Seidenfeld and Nicholson, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., and Rizzo, J. R. Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behaviour.Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 1972,7 467–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L.; Wolfe, D. M.; Quinn, R. P.; Snoek, J. D.; and Rosenthal, R. A.Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R., and Hart, B. D. Professor role preferences of entering college students and their parents.Journal of Educational Research 1969,63 150–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— Role preference of faculty in different age groups and academic disciplines.Sociology of Education 1971,44 351–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, H. L. The young college faculty member: a new breed?Sociology of Education 1969,42 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, R. Changing functions of a college professor. In N. Sanford (ed.),The American College New York: Wiley, 1962, pp. 290–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malherbe, E. G.Education in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquard, L.Peoples and Policies of South Africa. London: Oxford University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C., and Morse, S. J.Contemporary South Africa: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., and Platt, G. M. Considerations on the American academic system.Minerva 1967,6 497–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogue, F. G. Student ratings of the ideal professor.Improving College and University Teaching 1967,15 133–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W., and El-Assel, M. University size, university quality, and student protest.American Sociological Review 1969,34 702–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe, J., and Smythe, J. W.Education in Nigeria. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. M.Politics in the Republic of South Africa. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.; Blackstone, T.; and Metcalfe, D.The Academic Labour Market. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K., and Dizney, H. F. Eight professors: a study of college student preferences among their teachers.Journal of Educational Psychology 1976,57 146–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Deakin University, Australia

    Christopher Orpen

Authors
  1. Christopher Orpen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orpen, C. How much role conflict is there in the job of university lecturer? An international comparison. Res High Educ 17, 321–332 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977900

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977900

Keywords

Search

Navigation