Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer students in institutions of higher education

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to describe the extent of college transfers over two years since initial matriculation and to examine differences in background characteristics between transfers and nontransfers (i.e., persisters, withdrawals, and graduates). Data involved a national probability sample of the 1972 entering class. Major findings include the following: 25% of the 2-year college students transferred to a 4-year institution, and 16% of 4-year college students moved to another 4-year institution. This later group of students tended to hold higher socioeconomic status and college grades but lower ability test scores than persisters. Implications of the findings are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Council on Education. National norms for entering college freshmen. Washington, D.C., 1970.

  • Andersen, D. G., and Peterson, A. V. A comparison of college transfer students and native university students of nonacademic factors.College Student Journal 1973,7 (1), 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. F., and Riehl, N. S.Comparison of transfer and native student progress at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Fall 1971 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 099 022).

  • Astin, A. W.Predicting academic performance in college. New York: The Free Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E. W.College transfer students in Massachusetts: A study of 20,000 transfer applicants to 48 Massachusetts colleges and universities for fall, 1973. Boston: Massachusetts State Board of Higher Education, 1974 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 056 927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D.Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. B., and Balfour, L.Statistical abstracts of higher education in North Carolina, 1973–74 (Research Report No. 1-74). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. P.A general model for multivariate analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. F., and Dickinson, C.Upper-division academic performance of native and transfer students at the University of Washington. Washington University, 1974 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 098 878).

  • Holstrom, E. I., and Bisconti, A. S.Transfers from junior to senior colleges. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, Office of Research, 1974 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 093 422).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintzer, F. C. Focus on transfer: A new awareness.Community and Junior College Journal 1973a,43 (6), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintzer, F. C. The community college transfer student.New Directions for Community Colleges 1973b,1 (3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintzer, F. C.The transfer student dimension of articulation. Paper presented at the Airlie House Conference on College Transfer, Warrenton, Virginia, December 2–4, 1973c (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 088 408).

  • Knoell, D. M., and Medsker, L. L.From junior to senior college: a national study of the transfer student. Washington, D.C.: ACE, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhns, E. Resolution to end transfer hurdles.Community and Junior College Journal 1973,43 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznik, A. Reverse transfers: Students who transfer from four-year to two-year colleges.Journal of College Student Personnel 1972,13 (5), 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J. R., Lewis, L., Riccobono, J. A., and Moore, R. P.National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972. Base-Year, First and Second Follow-Up Data File Users Manual. Report prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickens, J. M.“Transfer shock” or “transfer ecstasy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1972 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 061 925).

  • Pasqua, T. It can aid transfer.Community and Junior College Journal 1974,44 (5), 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, S. S. Transfer students in institutions of higher education. Report prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.C. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchar, E. W., Van Dusen, W. D., and Jacobson, E. C.Student expenses at post-secondary institutions 1974–75. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivett, D. A. New developments in college transfer. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce.Undergraduate enrollment in two-year and four-year colleges. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1972, Series P-20, No. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne, C. High cost of transfer: The hidden penalties.Community and Junior College Journal 1974,45 (2), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne, C., et al.Comparison of the characteristics of transfer and nontransfer college students. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, Policy Analysis Service, 1973. Also prepared for Airlie House Conference, 1967–1971 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 085 028).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dusen, W. D. A forgotten minority. The transfer student needs financial aid, too.College Board Review 1974,92 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. Transfer student dilemma: Report on the 1973 National Conference Conference on Transfer Student Problems.College and University 1974,49 438–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W.The No. 2 access problem: Transfer to the upper division. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1972 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 066 140).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, S.S. Transfer students in institutions of higher education. Res High Educ 8, 319–342 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976802

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976802

Key words

Navigation