Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 239–255 | Cite as

Methodological and ethical issues in child abuse research

  • E. Jane Bradley
  • R. C. L. Lindsay
Article

Abstract

The child abuse literature was surveyed but found lacking in analyses of fundamental ethical and procedural issues. The present paper, supported by a review of the relevant research, explores the problems surrounding the definition of physical child abuse, the gender and recruitment of subjects, the use of informed consent and deception, and the problem of maintaining confidentiality in this area. Greater detail in reporting of methods employed by researchers is recommended as an important first step to expanding discussion of these issues.

Key words

child abuse methodology ethical issues 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adair, J. G., Dushenko, T. W., and Lindsay, R. C. L. (1985). Ethical regulations and their impact on research practice.Am. Psychologist 40: 59–72.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, W. D., and Twentyman, C. T. (1985). Abusing, neglectful and comparison mother's responses to child-related and non-child-related Stressors.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 335–343.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, A. M. (1980). The child abusing family: 1. Methodological issues and parent-related characteristics of abusing families.Am. J. Family Ther. 8: 53–66.Google Scholar
  4. Bousha, D. M., and Twentyman, C. T. (1984). Mother-child interactional style in abuse, neglect, and control groups: Naturalistic observations in the home.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 93: 106–114.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, E. J. (1986).A Comparison of Parental Attributions and Punitiveness in Samples of Abusive and Nonabusive Mothers,Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
  6. Crittenden, P. M. (1982). Abusing, neglecting, problematic and adequate dyads: Differentiating by patterns of interaction.Merrill-Palmer Quart. 27: 201–218.Google Scholar
  7. Crittenden, P. M. (1985). Social networks, quality of child rearing and child development.Child Dev. 56: 1299–1313.Google Scholar
  8. Dubanoski, R. A., Evans, I. M., and Higuchi, A. A. (1978). Analysis and treatment of child abuse: A set of behavioral propositions.Child Abuse Neglect 1: 153–172.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, K. (May, 1986). Ethics in research: Having respect for the subject.The APA Monitor 17: 1.Google Scholar
  10. Frodi, A. M., and Lamb, M. E. (1980). Child abusers' responses to infant smiles and cries.Child Dev. 51: 238–241.Google Scholar
  11. Holmes, D. S. (1976a). Debriefing after psychological experiment: I. Affectiveness of postdeception dehoaxing.Am. Psychologist 31: 858–867.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, D. S. (1976b). Debriefing after psychological experiment: II. Affectiveness of experimental desensitizing.Am. Psychologist 31: 868–875.Google Scholar
  13. Keith-Spiegel, P., and Koocher, G. P. (1985).Ethics in Psychology Professional standards and cases, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Kelman, H. C. (1972). The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy.Am. Psychologist 27: 989–1016.Google Scholar
  15. Lahey, B. B., Conger, R. D., Atkeson, B. M., and Treiber, F. A. (1984). Parenting behavior and emotional status of physically abusive mothers.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 52: 1062–1071.Google Scholar
  16. Larrance, D. T., and Twentyman, C. T. (1983). Maternal attributions and child abuse.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92: 449–457.Google Scholar
  17. Lueptow, L., Mueller, S. A., Hammes, R. R., and Masters, L. S. (1977). The impact of informed consent regulations on response rate and response bias.Sociological Methods Res. 6: 183–204.Google Scholar
  18. Mash, E. J., Johnston, C., and Kovitz, K. (1983). A comparison of the mother-child interactions of physically abused and non-abused children during play and task situations.J. Clin. Child Psychol. 12: 337–346.Google Scholar
  19. Milner, J. S., and Wimberley, R. C. (1979). An inventory for the identification of child abusers.J. Clin. Psychol. 35: 95–100.Google Scholar
  20. Newberger, C. M., and Cook, S. J. (1983). Parental awareness and child abuse: A cognitive-developmental analysis of urban and rural samples.Am. J. Orthopsychiatr. 53: 512–524.Google Scholar
  21. Parke, R. D., and Collmer, C. W. (1975). Child abuse: An interdisciplinary analysis. In Hetherington, E. M. (ed.),Review of Child Development Research Vol. 5, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Plotkin, R. C., Azar, S., Twentyman, C. T., and Perri, M. G. (1981). A critical evaluation of the research methodology employed in the investigation of causative factors of child abuse and neglect.Child Abuse Neglect 5: 449–455.Google Scholar
  23. Pruitt, D. L., and Erickson, M. T., (1985). The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: A study of concurrent validity.J. Clin. Psychology 41: 104–111.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, M. S., and Reppucci, N. D. (1983). Abusive mothers: Perceptions of their own and their children's behavior.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51: 674–682.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1975).The Volunteer Subject, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Salzinger, S., Kaplin, S., and Artemyeff, C. (1983). Mothers' personal social networks and child maltreatment.J. Abnorma. Psychol. 92: 68–76.Google Scholar
  27. Singer, E. (1978a). Informed consent: Consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys.Am. Sociological Rev. 43: 144–162.Google Scholar
  28. Singer, E. (1978b). The effect of informed consent procedures on respondents reactions to surveys.J. Consum Res. 5: 49–57.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, J. E. (1984). Non-accidental injury to children — I.Behav. Res. Ther. 22: 331–347.Google Scholar
  30. Spohn, H. E., and Fitzpatrick, T. (1980). Informed consent and bias in samples of schizophrenic subjects at risk for drug withdrawal.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 89: 79–92.Google Scholar
  31. Stringer, S. A., and La Greca, A. M. (1985). Correlates of child abuse potential.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 13: 217–226.Google Scholar
  32. Susman, E. J., Trickett, P. K., Iannotti, R. J., Hollenbeck, B. E., and Zahn-Waxler, C. (1985). Child-rearing patterns in depressed, abusive, and normal mothers.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 55: 237–251.Google Scholar
  33. Twentyman, C. T., and Plotkin, R. C. (1982). Unrealistic expectations of parents who maltreat their children: An educational deficit pertaining to child development.J. Clin. Psychol. 38: 497–503.Google Scholar
  34. Vasta, R., and Copitch, P. (1981). Simulating conditions of child abuse in the laboratory.Child Dev. 52: 164–170.Google Scholar
  35. Webster-Stratton, C. (1985). Comparison of abusive and nonabusive families with conduct-disorders children.Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 55: 59–69.Google Scholar
  36. Wolfe, D. A. (1985). Child-abusive parents: An empirical review and analysis.Psychological Bull. 97: 462–482.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfe, D. A., Fairbank, J. A., Kelly, J. A., and Bradlyn, A. S. (1983). Child abusive parents' physiological responses to stressful and non-stressful behavior in children.Behav. Assess. 5: 363–371.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Jane Bradley
    • 1
  • R. C. L. Lindsay
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations