Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 37–54 | Cite as

Factor similarity of the Conflict Tactics Scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications

  • Julian Barling
  • K. Daniel O'Leary
  • Ernest N. Jouriles
  • Dina Vivian
  • Karyl E. MacEwen
Article

Abstract

Wide variations in prevalence estimates of marital aggression point to the absence of a uniform and adequate definition of marital aggression. To focus on the construct validity of Straus' (1979) Conflict Tactics Scales, the most frequently used measure of marital aggression, two studies were conducted. Based on responses to the Conflict Tactics Scales, two consistent factors (viz. Physical and Psychological Aggression) emerged in separate samples of 187 couples seeking therapy for marital problems, and 398 nonclinic couples in beginning marriages. The factor structure was consistent across clinic and nonclinic samples, sex, geographical sites, time, and socioeconomic status. Implications for the measurement of interspousal physical aggression are raised (e.g., mild, moderate, and severe aggression load on the same factor) and appropriate directions for further research on the construct validity of the Conflict Tactics Scales are suggested (e.g., conducting similar factor analyses on aggressive couples).

Key words

marital violence spouse abuse assessment factor analysis conflict tactics scale 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arias, I. Samios, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression in dating couples.Journal of Family Violence, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Barling, J., and Rosenbaum, A. (1986). Work Stressors and wife abuse.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 346–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard, M. L., and Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as model for love relationships.Family Rel. 32: 283–286.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, S. R., and Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J. Personal. 54: 106–148.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, J., and Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scales: Using couple data to quantify the differential responding effect.J. Marriage Fain. 48: 375–379.Google Scholar
  6. Cate, R. M., Henton, J. M., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., and Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective.J. Fam. Issues 3: 79–90.Google Scholar
  7. Comrey, A. L. (1978). Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies.J. Consult. Clin. Psycholl. 46: 648–659.Google Scholar
  8. Fullagar, C. (1986). A factor analytic study on the validity of a union commitment scale.J. Appl. Psychol. 71: 129–136.Google Scholar
  9. Gelles, R. J. (1974).The Violent Home, Sage, Calif.Google Scholar
  10. Gully, K. J., and Dengerink, H. A. (1983). The dyadic adjustment of persons with violent and nonviolent histories.Aggr. Behav. 9: 13–20.Google Scholar
  11. Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., and Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse.J. Marriage Fam. 43: 675–692.Google Scholar
  12. Horowitz, L. M., Inouye, D., and Siegelman, E. Y. (1979). On averaging judges' ratings to increase their reliability with an external criterion.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 453–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Marriage Fam. 43: 873–885.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, N. S., and Moore, D. (1981). Spouses as observers of the events in their relationship.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 269–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jorgensen, S. R. (1977). Societal class heterogamy, status striving and perception of marital conflict: A partial replication and revision of Pearlin's contingency hypothesis.J. Marriage Fam. 39: 653–659.Google Scholar
  16. Jouriles, E. N., Barling, J., and O'Leary, K. D. (1986). Predicting child behavior problems in violent families.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
  17. Jouriles, E. N., and O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 419–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy.Psychometrica, 35: 401–415.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, J., and Mueller, C. W. (1978).Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Sage, Calif.Google Scholar
  20. Lent, B. (1986). Diagnosing wife assault.Canadian Fam. Physician 32: 847–849.Google Scholar
  21. Levine, M. S. (1977).Canonical Analysis and Factor Comparisons, Sage, Calif.Google Scholar
  22. Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.Marriage Fam. Living 21: 251–255.Google Scholar
  23. MacEwen, K. E., and Barling, J. (1986). Interrole conflict, family support and marital adjustment in employed mothers: A short-term, longitudinal study. Manuscript submitted for publication, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
  24. Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students.Family Relat. 30: 97–102.Google Scholar
  25. Maher, B. (1978). A reader's, writer's and reviewer's guide to assessing research reports in clinical psychology.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 835–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell, R. E., and Hodson, C. A. (1983). Coping with domestic violence: Social support and psychological health among battered women.Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 11: 629–654.Google Scholar
  27. O'Leary, K. D., and Arias, I. (1986). Assessing reliability of reports of spouse abuse. In G. Hotaling and D. Finkelhor (Eds.)Proceedings of the Family Violence Conference, Sage, Calif.Google Scholar
  28. O'Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., and Tyree, A. (1986). Prevalence and stability of interspousal aggression. Manuscript revised for publication, SUNY at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  29. O'Leary, K. D., and Turkewitz, H. (1978). Methodological errors in marital and child treatment research.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 747–758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenbaum, A., and O'Leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 63–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulman, M. A. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC., Study No. 792701.Google Scholar
  32. Schumm, W. R., Bollman, S. R., Jurich, A. P., and Martin, M. J. (1982). Adolescent perspectives on family violence.J. Social Psychol. 117: 153–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Strahan, R. F. (1980). More on averaging judge's ratings: Determining the most reliable composite.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 48: 587–589.Google Scholar
  34. Straus, M. A. (1978). Wife beating: How common and why?Victimology 2: 443–458.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marriage Fam. 41: 75–86.Google Scholar
  36. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1979). Violence in the American family.J. Social Issues 35: 15–39.Google Scholar
  37. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys.J. Marriage Fam. In press.Google Scholar
  38. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence.J. Marriage Family 45: 633–644.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfe, D. A., Jaffe, P., Wilson, S. K., and Zak, L. (1985). Children of battered women: The relation of child behavior to family violence and maternal stress.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 657–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Barling
    • 1
  • K. Daniel O'Leary
    • 2
  • Ernest N. Jouriles
    • 2
  • Dina Vivian
    • 2
  • Karyl E. MacEwen
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen's UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.State University of New York at Stony BrookStony Brook

Personalised recommendations