Skip to main content
Log in

Filipino and American student perceptions of teacher effectiveness

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Filipino and American undergraduate students rated college instructor characteristics according to their perceived importance for effective teaching. Items were selected to reflect relevant value orientations in Filipino and American cultures. Factor analysis of the ratings revealed six underlying dimensions. MANOVA results showed that the group ratings on the six corresponding subscales were significantly different. Discriminant function analysis revealed that Filipino students rated items pertaining to authoritarianism and personal appearance of the instructor as significantly more important for effective teaching than did American students. This suggests that cross-cultural differences in perceptions of effective teaching may be predictable from a knowledge of both similar and conflicting value orientations in the specific cultures. Implications for the academic adjustment of students from different cultures were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bail, F. T., Dunn-Rankin, P., & Norton, R. E. Student evaluation of college teaching. Unpublished manuscript, 1975.

  • Bulatao, J. Personal preferences of Filipino students.Philippine Sociological Review 1963,2 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B.Factor analysis. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunnual, N.Psycho-social adaptations of international exchange students in American university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, 1976.

  • Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R.Multivariate procedures for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H.A theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, K. S., & Norr, J. L. Student values and student evaluation: A problem in person perception.Sociometry 1973,36 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951,16 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, P. M.Socio-psychological development of Filipino children. Manila, Philippines: P. M. Flores, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, G., & Azores, F. Philippine interpersonal behavior patterns. In W. Bello and A. de Guzman (Eds.),Modernization: Its impact in the Philippines (IPC Papers No. 6). Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, G., & Jacobs, P. J.Child-rearing and personality development in the Philippines. University Park, Pa: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J.A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, M., Wilson, R., & Dienst, E.Evaluating university teaching. Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homyen, D.Students' perception of the effective college teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of the Philippines, 1972.

  • Katz, J. Personality and interpersonal relations in the college classroom. In W. Sanford (Ed.),The American College. New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenfield, J.Effective teachers of Indian and Eskimo high school students. Fairbanks: Center for Northern Educational Research, University of Alaska, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, R., Lin, Y., Milholland, J., & Isaacson, R. Students' affiliations, motives, teacher warmth, and academic achievement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,5 457–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, P. P., & Jocano, F. L.The Filipino family in its urban and rural orientation: Two case studies. Manila: Regal Printing, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro, X. Ideal and actual student perception of college instructors as predictors of teacher effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, 1978.

  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. Equivalence in cross-cultural research.Public Opinion Quarterly 1966,30 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayder, N. F. College student ratings of instructors.Journal of Experimental Education 1968,37 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D., Rosenberg, L., & Bezdek, W. E. Teacher behavior and student learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 1964,55 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K.The development and validation of an instrument to measure teaching effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle College, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetembaum, T. J. The role of student needs and teacher orientation in student rating of teachers.American Educational Research Journal 1975,12 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varias-de Guzman, J., & Varias, R. R.Psychology of Filipinos (rev. ed.). Manila, Philippines: J. Varias-de Guzman & R. R. Varias, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bail, F.T., Mina, S.S. Filipino and American student perceptions of teacher effectiveness. Res High Educ 14, 135–145 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976290

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976290

Keywords

Navigation