Abstract
This investigation focuses on the participants, strategies, and tactics involved in the curriculum change process in higher education. Using the exploratory case study approach in three accredited graduate schools of business, the study identifies and describes the roles of two groups of participants: internals, (faculty, administration, students), and externals (trustees, alumni, community leaders, unions). Two basic strategies, the empirical rational and the power coercive, are found to be important approaches to curriculum change. A typology of factors is used to describe the specific methods used to implement (or resist) curriculum change. It was expected that the participants, strategies, and tactics involved in the curriculum change process in graduate schools of business would be unique. The findings suggest that strategies and tactics employed in higher education are quite similar to those employed in other organizations with respect to the process of change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, C., Kellog, T., & Schroeder, R. Decision making and information systems in colleges.The Journal of Higher Education 1976,47 33–49.
Alluto, J., & Belasco, J. Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision making.Educational Administration Quarterly Winter 1973,9 27–41.
Beckhard, R.Organization development: strategies and models. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
Campbell, R., & Newell, L. A study of professors of educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly Autumn 1973,9 3–27.
Chin, R., & Benne, K. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In W. Bennis, K. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.),The planning of change. New York: Holt, 1969.
Fuller, B. A framework for academic planning,The Journal of Higher Education 1976,47 65–77.
Hefferlin, J. Hauling academic trunks. In C. Walker (Ed.),Elements involved in academic change. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges, 1972.
Holm, D. The management of change in higher education.Professional File June 1972,3 2.
Hulin, C., & Blood, M. Job enlargement, individual differences, and worker response.Psychological Bulletin 1968,69 41–55.
Jellman, W. (Ed.).Efficient college management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972.
Martorana, S., & Kuhns, E.Managing academic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
Richman, B., and Farmer, R.Leadership, goals, and power in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trinkaus, J.W., Booke, A.L. The curriculum change process: Participants, strategies, and tactics. Res High Educ 13, 307–319 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976251
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976251