Skip to main content
Log in

The curriculum change process: Participants, strategies, and tactics

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation focuses on the participants, strategies, and tactics involved in the curriculum change process in higher education. Using the exploratory case study approach in three accredited graduate schools of business, the study identifies and describes the roles of two groups of participants: internals, (faculty, administration, students), and externals (trustees, alumni, community leaders, unions). Two basic strategies, the empirical rational and the power coercive, are found to be important approaches to curriculum change. A typology of factors is used to describe the specific methods used to implement (or resist) curriculum change. It was expected that the participants, strategies, and tactics involved in the curriculum change process in graduate schools of business would be unique. The findings suggest that strategies and tactics employed in higher education are quite similar to those employed in other organizations with respect to the process of change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C., Kellog, T., & Schroeder, R. Decision making and information systems in colleges.The Journal of Higher Education 1976,47 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alluto, J., & Belasco, J. Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision making.Educational Administration Quarterly Winter 1973,9 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R.Organization development: strategies and models. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., & Newell, L. A study of professors of educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly Autumn 1973,9 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, R., & Benne, K. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In W. Bennis, K. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.),The planning of change. New York: Holt, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. A framework for academic planning,The Journal of Higher Education 1976,47 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefferlin, J. Hauling academic trunks. In C. Walker (Ed.),Elements involved in academic change. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, D. The management of change in higher education.Professional File June 1972,3 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulin, C., & Blood, M. Job enlargement, individual differences, and worker response.Psychological Bulletin 1968,69 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellman, W. (Ed.).Efficient college management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martorana, S., & Kuhns, E.Managing academic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, B., and Farmer, R.Leadership, goals, and power in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trinkaus, J.W., Booke, A.L. The curriculum change process: Participants, strategies, and tactics. Res High Educ 13, 307–319 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976251

Keywords

Navigation