Skip to main content
Log in

The income consequences of the all-doctorate marriage

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Income levels and percentage change in 1971–1975 income were regressed on personal and institutional variables for husband and wife doctorates holding full-time academic positions. Results of the composite equation indicate a $1,254 premium associated with being male after controlling for the other variables. Composite results also indicate a negative relationship between income for one spouse and the perceived opportunities for employment of the other spouse. Separate equations for the spouses indicate that this result related only to the wives' perceived opportunities of their husbands' income. By eliminating individuals with education doctorates and substituting the husbands' weights for the wives', the $1,254 differential was partially eliminated. The remaining differential between husbands' and wives' income was due to the greater involvement of the males in consulting and administration, greater involvement of the women in education, and fewer number of years of full-time experience of the wives. Comparison of income changes in both the composite and separate equations indicate that the wives received an 8–9% greater income increase than their husbands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, H, and Bayer, E. Sex discrimination in academe.Educational Record 1972,53 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, D.Compensation administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, R. B., Bryson, J. B., Licht, M. H., and Licht, B. G. The professional pair: husband and wife psychologists.American Psychologist 1976,31 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G. G., and Watts, H. W. Problems in making policy inferences from the Coleman report.American Sociological Review 1970,35 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. Women, men and the doctorate. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronicle of Higher Education. Women's struggle to catch up. August 5, 1974.

  • Cox, Marci, and Astin, H. Sex differentials in faculty salaries.Research in Higher Education 1977,7 289–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, Marianne A., and Kordick, Betty. Sex differentials in the earnings of Ph.D.'s.Industrial and Labor Relations Review 1977,31 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N., Morton, T., and Braden, I. Faculty salaries: Is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline.American Economic Review 1974,64 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. E., and Stafford, F. B. Lifetime earnings in a professional labor market: Academic economists.Journal of Political Economy, 1973,

  • Katz, D. Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university.American Economic Review 1973,63 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. R. A general theory of executive compensation based on statistically tested propositions.Quarterly Journal of Economics 1956,20 270–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. R.Executive Compensation. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose, K. D., and Anderson, C. J. A rating of graduate school programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G. Discrimination: the case of baseball. In R. G. Noll (Ed.)Government and the sports business. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1974, pp. 221–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E.Corporate control and business behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shulenburger, D., Whitely, W. The income consequences of the all-doctorate marriage. Res High Educ 10, 173–188 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976228

Key words

Navigation