Relationship between sex and leadership behavior of department heads in physical education
This study assessed perceptions of actual and ideal leadership behaviors of male and female department heads as described by themselves and by their faculties in university physical education departments. Responses to the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ-Real) and Ideal Leader Behavior Questionnaire (LBDQ-Ideal) provided data on these perceptions by faculties and department heads. Data were gathered from 49 department heads and 427 faculty members from four types of departments—segregated departments with male heads, segregated departments with female heads, integrated departments with male heads, and integrated departments with female heads. The findings indicated that (1) Male and female heads of department did not differ in their perceptions of the desirable attributes of an ideal leader, their perceptions of their own actual leadership behavior, or in their proneness to view their leadership behavior as ideal. (2) There is a mutual tendency for faculty of both sexes to perceive consideration behavior of the heads differently when the head is of the same sex. Women faculty viewed female department heads as providing more initiation of structure than male heads.
Key wordssex leadership behavior physical education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hemphill, J. K., & Coons, A. E. Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.),Leader behavior: its description and measurement. Columbus, Ohio: State University Bureau of Business Research, Monograph 88, 1957.Google Scholar
- 2.Halpin A. W., & Winer, B. J. A factoral study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.),Leader behavior: its description and measurement. Columbus, Ohio: State University Bureau of Business Research, Monograph 88, 1957.Google Scholar
- 3.Halpin A. W.Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire. Columbus, Ohio: State University Bureau of Business Research, 1957.Google Scholar
- 4.Bartol, K. M., and Butterfield, A. D. Sex effects in evaluating leaders,Journal of Applied Psychology 1976,61 446–454.Google Scholar
- 5.Brown, A. F. Reactions to leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly 1967,3 62–73.Google Scholar
- 6.Buckiewicz, D. R. An analysis of the leader behavior in the physical education departments of the community colleges of California, Orgon and Washington (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1974).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 35, 5087A. (University Microfilms No. 75-04502).Google Scholar
- 7.Eskilson, A., and Wiley, M. Sex composition and leadership in small groups.Sociometry 1976,39 183–193.Google Scholar
- 8.Holloman, C. R. The perceived leadership role of military and civilian supervisory in a military setting.Personnel Psychology 1967,20 199–210.Google Scholar
- 9.House, R. J., Filley, A. C., and Kerr, S. Relation of leader consideration and initiating structure to R and D subordinates' satisfaction.Administration Science Quarterly 1971,16 19–30.Google Scholar
- 10.Morsink, H. M. Leader behavior of men and women principals.NAASP Bulletin 1969,54 80–87.Google Scholar
- 11.Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.Google Scholar