The purpose of this research is to investigate the determinants of student attrition in institutions of higher education. A causal model was developed which synthesized research findings on turnover in work organizations and on student attrition. Questionnaires were distributed to university freshmen (N = 1,171). The data was analyzed using multiple regression and path analysis. The regressions produced anR 2 = .36 for females and .27 for males. Findings indicate that three surrogate measures for pay were significantly related to intent to leave for both sexes and that the theories and determinants developed in research on turnover are useful in studies of student attrition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aiken, M., and Hage, J. Reply to Tausky.American Sociological Review 1967,32 118–120.
American College Testing Program.Class profile, national norms: ACT class profile report for 1976–1977 freshmen. Iowa City: ACT Research Services, 1977.
Astin, A. W.College dropouts: a national profile. ACE Research Reports, 7. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1972.
Astin, A. W.Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
Baumgart, N. E., and Johnstone, J. N. Attrition at an Australian university: a case study.Journal of Higher Education 1977,48 553–570.
Bayer, A. E. College dropout: factors affecting senior college completion.Sociology of Education 1968,41 305–316.
Bean, J. P.Dropouts and turnover: the synthesis of a causal model of student attrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 1978.
Bean, J. P. Path analysis: The development of a suitable methodology for the study of student attrition. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, 1979.
Campbell, D., and Fiske, R. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychology Bulletin 1959,56 81–105.
Cope R. and Hannah, W.Revolving college doors. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951,16 297–334.
Davis, J. A. The campus as a frog pond: an application of the theory of relative deprivation in career decisions of college men.American Journal of Sociology 1966,72 17–31.
Durkheim, E.Suicide (J. Spaulding and G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe: The Free Press, 1961.
Heise, D. R. Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In E. F. Borgatta (Ed.),Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
Heywood, J. A report on student wastage.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 189–237.
Iffert, R. E.Retention and withdrawal of college students. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1958.
Kerlinger, F. L. and Pedhazur, E. J.,Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Kim, J. and Kohout, F. Multiple regression analysis: subprogram regression. In Nie, et al (Eds.)Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Knoell, D. M. Institutional research on retention and withdrawal. InResearch on College Students. Boulder, Colorado, and Berkeley, California: The Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education and the Center for Higher Education, 1960.
Land, K. C. Principles of Path Analysis. In Edgar F. Borgatta (ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mehra, N.Retention and withdrawal of university students: a study of academic performance of a freshman class. Alberta: University of Alberta, 1973.
Merton, R. K.Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press, 1968.
Nunnally, J. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Pantages, T. J., and Creedon, C. F. Studies of college attrition: 1950–1975.Review of Educational Research 1978,48 49–101.
Price, J. L.The Study of Turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1977.
Richling, J. 70 percent.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 135–138.
Rosenberg, M.The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1968.
Sexton, V. Factors contributing to attrition in college populations: twenty-five years of research.Personnel and Guidance Journal 1965,72 301–326.
Spady, W. G. Dropouts from higher education: an interdisciplinary review and synthesis.Interchange 1970,1 64–85.
Spady, W. G. Dropouts from higher education: toward an empirical model.Interchange 1971,2 38–62.
SPSS. Batch release. 7.0 Update Manual (Multilith).
Summerskill, J. Dropouts from college. In N. Sanford (Ed.),The American College. New York: Wiley, 1965.
Terenzini, P. T. and Pascarella, E. T. The relation of freshmen students' social and academic integration to attrition. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of The Association for Institutional Research, Los Angeles, 1976.
Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. Toward the validation of Tinto's model of student attrition: a review of recent studies. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research, San Diego, 1979.
Tinto, V. Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 1975,45 89–125.
Vaizey, J. The Costs of Wastage.New Universities Quarterly 1971,25 139–145.
Wegner, E. L. and Sewell, W. H. Selection and context as factors affecting the probability of graduation from college.American Journal of Sociology 1970,75 665–679.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bean, J.P. Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Res High Educ 12, 155–187 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976194
- High Education
- Research Finding
- Education Research
- Surrogate Measure
- Path Analysis