Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tracking the mentoring process: A multimethod approach

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bey, T., & Holmes, C. (Eds.). (1990).Mentoring: Developing successful new teachers. Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D.M. (1986).Richardson new teacher induction program: Final data analysis and report (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267 627). Richardson, TX. Richardson Independent School District.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBolt, G.P. (Ed.). (1992).Teacher induction and mentoring: School-based collaborative programs. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C.M. (1989). Improving elementary classroom management: A school-based program for beginning the year:Journal of Educational Research, 83(2), 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C.M., Wade, M.W., & Smithey, M.W. (1993, April). Learning to mentor: Redefining knowledge, role, and self. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.

  • Feiman-Nemser, S.F. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.),Handbook of teaching and policy. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S.F., & Parker, M.B. (1992, Spring).Mentoring in context: A comparison of two US programs for beginning teachers (NCRTL special report). E. Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F.F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization.American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W.A., & Gray, M.M. (1985). Synthesis of research on mentoring.Educational Leadership, 43(3), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E. (1982). Induction: The missing link.Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E., George, A.A., & Rutherford, W.L. (1977).Measuring Stages of Concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC questionnaire, Austin, TX: The Research & Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, C., & Welchert, A. (1990). Mentoring relations: A definition to advance research and practice.Educational Researcher, 19(9), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W.R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education, New York: Macmillan, pp. 535–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huling-Austin, L., Putnam, S. & Galvez-Hjornevik, C. (1986).Model teacher induction project study findings (Report No. 7212). Austin, TX: The Research & Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug, B.J., & Salzman, S.A. (1991). Formal induction vs. informal mentoring: Comparative effects and outcomes.Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.W. (1990). The mentor phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. In C. Cazden (Ed.),Review of Research in Education (Vol. 16). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, pp. 297–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1966). Teacher socialization: The Robinson Crusoe model. In National Education Association,The real world of the beginning teacher. Washington, DC: NEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975).School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, S.J. (1986). Induction support of new teachers: A functional approach.Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, S.J. (1990). Support for new teachers. In T. Bey & C. Holmes (Eds.),Mentoring: Developing successful new teachers, Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithey, M.W., Wade, M.W., & Evertson, C.M. (1993). Collegiality and learning to teach: Interns' responses to the mentoring process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.

  • Summers, J.A. (1987).Summative evaluation report: Project CREDIT. Terre Haute, IN: Indiana State University, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosha, P. (1991, March). The benefits of an induction program: What do mentors and novices say? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, 203 Mayborn, Magnolia Circle, 37203, Nashville, TN

    Margaret W. Smithey & Carolyn M. Evertson

Authors
  1. Margaret W. Smithey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carolyn M. Evertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smithey, M.W., Evertson, C.M. Tracking the mentoring process: A multimethod approach. J Pers Eval Educ 9, 33–53 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975248

Keywords

Search

Navigation