Research in Higher Education

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 153–158 | Cite as

Estimating the effects of college, department, course, and teacher on earned credit rates

  • John Q. Easton
  • Thomas R. Guskey
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine systematically the variance in earned credit rates (percent of students earning A, B, C, or D) in an urban community college system. An ANOVA design was employed to estimate the independent effects of four independent variables: college, department, course, and teacher (nested within college by department). The results of the analysis indicate significant effects on earned credit rates due to college, department, and teacher. Differences between colleges and between teachers within departments in colleges account for the preponderance of the variance. This paper contains a discussion of departmental staff development tactics.

Keywords

Independent Effect Education Research Community College Credit Rate Urban Community 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beal, P. E., and Noel, L. What works in student retention. The American College Testing Program and the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Brophy, J. E. Successful teaching strategies for the inner-city child.Phi Delta Kappan 1982,64 527–530.Google Scholar
  3. Brophy, J. E., and Evertson, C. M.Learning from Teaching: A developmental Perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Easton, J. Q., and Guskey, T. R.Clarifying Terms for Research in the City Colleges of Chicago. Chicago, Illinois: Center for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, City Colleges of Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. Gillmore, G. M., Kane, M. T., and Naccarto, R. W. The generalizability of student ratings of instruction: estimation of teacher and course components.Journal of Educational Measurement 1978,15 1–13.Google Scholar
  6. Guskey, T. R., and Easton, J. Q. The characteristics of very effective teachers in urban community colleges.Community/Junior College Research Quarterly 1983,7 265–274.Google Scholar
  7. Guskey, T. R., Easton, J. Q., and Barshis, D.Seminar on Effective Instruction. Chicago, Illinois: Center for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, City Colleges of Chicago, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. Guskey, T. R., and Monsaas, J. A. Mastery learning: A model for academic success in urban junior colleges.Research in Higher Education 1979,11 263–274.Google Scholar
  9. McDonald, F. J., and Elias, P.The Effects of Teaching Performance on Pupil Learning: Final Report, Volume I, Beginning Teaching Evaluation Study, Phase II, 1974–1976. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Medley, D. M.Teacher Competence and Teacher Effectiveness: A review of Process-Product Research. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Rakow, E. A., Airasian, P. W., and Madaus, G. F. Assessing school and program effectiveness: estimating teacher level effects.Journal of Educational Measurement 1978,15 15–21.Google Scholar
  12. Rouche, J. E. Don't close the door.Community and Junior College Journal 1981/1982,52 17–23.Google Scholar
  13. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., with Smith, A.Fifteen-Thousand Hours. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. Stallings, J. Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time-on-task.Educational Researcher 1980,9 11–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Q. Easton
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Guskey
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Improvement of Teaching and LearningChicago
  2. 2.University of KentuckyUSA

Personalised recommendations