Skip to main content
Log in

The role of statements of institutional purpose

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper assesses the utility and role of institutional purpose statements. If they are as effective as one is led to believe, what intrinsic facts or elements make them so? Is there value in having a purpose statement, or is the value attributed to the exercise of creating and discussing it? If there is such a value, what forms and circumstances create the value? What forms do mission statements usually take? Do different forms have different attributes? In addressing these questions, two methods are employed. One is conventional in that literature documenting the theory and research of others has been carefully reviewed, but from the particular perspectives of form and effectiveness. The other is to examine a series of actual statements of institutional purpose, with particular regard to form, content, and context of planning. To elucidate the context of planning, a series of master plans and mission statements for systems of higher education are also examined. In total, 32 institutional statements and 12 system plans or statements are examined. (The plans that are examined are listed in Appendixes A and B.) The paper observes that mission statements are effective in some situations, but not in all. In some situations they may be disadvantageous. Although planning theorists suggest that mission statements follow an approximately common form, the study of actual statements indicates several different types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balderston, F. E. and Weatherly, G. B. (1972). PPBS in higher education planning and management: From PPBS to policy analysis. Office of the Vice-President—Planning, University of California.

  • Bean, John P., and Kuh, George D. (1984). Typology of planning problems.Journal of Higher Education 55(1): 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovey, Edmund C., Chairman (December 1984).Ontario Universities: Options and Futures. Report of the Commission on the Future Development of the Universities of Ontario. Toronto, Ontario: Ministry of Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, John M. (1988).Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadwallader, Mervyn L. (1983). Open planning: A case study in educational change.Planning for Higher Education 11(2): 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1980).Three Thousand Futures: The Next Twenty Years for Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, J. Kent, and Lott, Gary B. (1981).Mission Review: Foundation for Strategic Planning. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983).The Higher Education System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1987). Planning for excellence: The condition of the professoriate.Planning for Higher Education 16(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. L., et al., eds. (1980).New Perspectives on Planning in Educational Organizations. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals (March 1985).Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. United Kingdom.

  • Cope, Robert G. (1978).Strategic Policy Planning: A Guide for College and University Administrators. Littleton, CO: The Ireland Educational Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, Robert G. (1981).Strategic Planning, Management and Decision Making. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosand, Joseph P. (1980). Developing an institutional master plan.Improving Academic Management, P. Jedamus and M. Peterson and Associates (eds.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUDEC (Canadian Universities Data Exchange Consortium), 1985–86.

  • Darling, A. L., Lang, D. W., England, M. D. and Lopers-Sweetman, R. (1989). Autonomy and control: A university funding formula as an instrument of public policy.Higher Education 18(5).

  • Davies, Gordon K. (1986). The importance of being general: Philosophy, politics, and institutional mission statements.Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2. John C. Smart (ed.). New York: Agathon Press, pp. 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, Paul M. (1987). Mission, organization, and leadership.Journal of Higher Education 58(1): 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter (1973).Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1964).Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, Robert H. (1980). Setting institutional goals and objectives.Improving Academic Management, P. Jedamus and M. Peterson and Associates (eds.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, T. (1980). Beyond survival: Policies for academic revitalization in an uncertain environment.Canadian Journal of Higher Education 10(2): 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1984). Public philosophy and the crisis in education.Harvard Educational Review 54: 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, Edward R. (1988).Higher Education and State Governments. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedamus, Paul, and Peterson, M. W. eds. (1980).Improving Academic Management. A Handbook of Planning and Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, George (1983).Academic Strategy. The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Clark, director. Commission on Strengthening Presidential Leadership (October 1984).Presidents Make a Difference: Strengthening Leadership in Colleges and Universities. Sponsored by the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.

  • Konrad, A. G., and McNeal, Joanne (1984). Goals in Canadian universities.Canadian Journal of Higher Education 14: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip, and Murphy, Patrick E. (1981). Strategic planning for higher education.Journal of Higher Education 52(5): 470–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Daniel (Fall 1988). Planning and decision-making in universities. Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education.Professional File, no. 4.

  • Martin, Warren Bryan (1985). Mission: A statement of identity and direction. InOpportunity in Adversity, J. S. Green and A. Levine (eds.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, Brenda D. (1986). The university's statement of goals. An idea whose time has come.Higher Education 15: 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors' Association (August 1986).Time for Results: The Governors' 1991 Report on Education. Washington, D.C.

  • Newsom, Walter, and Hayes, C. Ray (1991). Are mission statements worthwhile?Planning for Higher Education 19(2): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Barbara (1986). Agreement of mission and institutional responses to decline.Research in Higher Education 25(2): 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., and Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982).In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. E., and Loye, D. E. (1967).Conversations Toward a Definition of Institutional Vitality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regents of the University of the State of New York (1979).The Bulletin of the Regents 1980 Statewide Plan for the Development of Postsecondary Education. Albany, NY: The State Education Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Richard C., and Doucette, Donald S. (1984). An empirical model for formulating operational missions of community colleges. Unpublished paper.

  • Richardson, Richard C., and Gardner, Don E. (1983). Avoiding extremes in the planning continuum.Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 180–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, B. M., and Farmer, R. N. (1974).Leadership, Goals, and Power in Higher Education: A Contingency and Open Systems Approach to Effective Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtlein, F. A. (1989). Center findings reveal planning problems.News from SCUP 19(4).

  • Schmidtlein, F. A., and Milton, T. H. (1988). Campus planning in the United States: Perspectives from a nationwide study. Unpublished paper.

  • Sibley, William M. (1986). Strategic planning and management for change.Canadian Journal of Higher Education 16(2): 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, J. (1982). Assessing institutional performance and progress.Agenda for Institutional Change in Higher Education, L. Wagner, (ed.). Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer, Wesley Kenneth, ed. (September 1981).Advancing the Small College. New Directions for Institutional Advancement 13. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lang, D.W., Lopers-Sweetman, R. The role of statements of institutional purpose. Res High Educ 32, 599–624 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974734

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974734

Keywords

Navigation