Advertisement

Siberian Mathematical Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 711–716 | Cite as

Estimate of the deformation of a strictly convex domain as a function of the change in the relative metric of its boundary

  • V. A. Aleksandrov
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Keywords

Convex Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    A. D. Aleksandrov, Intrinsic Geometry of Convex Surfaces [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow-Leningrad (1948).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Berge, Geometry [Russian translation], Vol. 1, Mir, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Aleksandrov and A. P. Kopylov, “Boundary values of quasi-isometric maps and unique determination of closed convex surfaces,” Symposium on Geometry in the Large and the Foundations of Relativity Theory. Novosibirsk, September 1982. Abstracts of Lectures [in Russian], Inst. Mat. Sibirsk. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Novosibirsk (1982), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. A. Aleksandrov, “Isometry of domains in Rn and relative isometry of their boundaries. I,” Sib. Mat. Zh.,25, No. 3, 3–13 (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Aleksandrov, “Isometry of domains in Rn and relative isometry of their boundaries. II,” Sib. Mat. Zh.,26, No. 6, 3–8 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. A. Aleksandrov, “On domains which are uniquely determined by the relative metrics of their boundaries,” Trudy Inst. Mat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirsk. Otd.,7: Research in Geometry and Mathematical Analysis [in Russian] (1987), pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. A. Aleksandrov, “Unique determination of domains with non-Jordan boundaries,” All-Union Conference on Geometry “in the Large”. Novosibirsk, Sept. 1987. Abstracts of Lectures [in Russian], Inst. Mat. Sibirsk. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Novosibirsk (1987), p. 3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibid., Sib. Mat. Zh.,30, No. 1, 3–12 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. A. Trotsenko, “Unique determination of bounded domains by the metric of the boundary induced by the metric of the domain,” All-Union Conference on Geometry “in the Large”. Novosibirsk, Sept. 1987. Abstracts of Lectures [in Russian], Inst. Mat. Sibirsk. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Novosibirsk (1987), p. 122.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu. A. Volkov, “Estimate of the deformation of a convex surface depending on the change in its intrinsic metric,” Ukr. Geometr. Sb., Khar'kov, Nos. 5/6, 44–69 (1968).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. P. Kopylov, “On boundary values of maps which are nearly isometric,” Sib. Mat. Zh.,25, No. 3, 120–131 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Blaschke, Kreis und Kugel [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Aleksandrov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations