Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of integration, commitment, and student characteristics and retention among younger and older students

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to explore the differential persistence impact of the components of the Tinto model, preentry characteristics, initial goals and commitments, integration, subsequent goals and commitments, and external commitments, to the process of younger and older student persistence. The sample (N=449) included first-time students enrolled full- or part-time at a large, urban community college. The study design was longitudinal with questionnaire data gathered at the beginning and end of the spring 1989 semester. Persistence was measured from the spring to the following fall semester. Discriminant function analysis was used to study multivariate differences between short-term persisters and nonpersisters. Younger (17 to 24 years) and older (25+ years) student data were analyzed separately. Findings indicated (1) integration was more important to the persistence of younger students than it was for the older cohort; (2) self-assessed study skills were the most important discriminator for older students; (3) student perceptions of cognitive and personal development were important to persistence in both groups; and (4) goal commitment was important to the persistence of both age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1975).Preventing Students from Dropping Out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1982). Student attrition, intentions, and confidence.Research in Higher Education 17: 291–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process.Review of Higher Education 6: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P., and Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition.Review of Educational Research 55: 485–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. and Metzner, B. S. (1987). A conceptual model of nontraditional student attrition.Research in Higher Education 27(1): 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B. (1985).A Descriptive Study of Public High School Guidance. Report to the commission for the study of precollegiate guidance and counseling. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, Peter (1985). Assessment—what's it all about.Change 32– 36.

  • Garber, H., and Schell, R. E. (1977).Differences in Rates and Modes of Attrition Between Three Groups of Undergraduate Students. Research report. Oswego: State University of New York College at Oswego (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 176-673).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Gary R. (1988a). Critical issues in the assessment of value added in education. In Trudy Banta (ed.),Implementing Outcomes Assessment: Promise and Perils, San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Gary R. (1988b). Educational goal attainment: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at annual meeting AERA, New Orleans, LA.

  • Iverson, Barbara, Pascarella, Ernest, and Terenzini, Patrick (1988). Informal faculty-student contact and commuter college freshmen.Research in Higher Education 21(2): 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenning, Oscar T. (1988). Use of noncognitive measures in assessment. In Trudy Banta (ed.),Implementing Outcomes Assessment: Promise and Perils. San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzner, Barbara, and Bean, John P. (1987). The estimation of a conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition.Research in Higher Education 27(1): 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moline, A. (1987). Financial aid and student persistence: An application of causal modeling.Research in Higher Education 26(2): 130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, A. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicano college students: A structural model.Research in Higher Education 26(1): 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Mary Diederich (1988). An analysis of predictors of early academic dismissal.Research in Higher Education 28(1): 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. Robert (1985). Perspectives and problems in student outcomes research. In Peter Ewell (ed.),Perspectives and Problems in Students Outcomes Research. San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1986). A program for research and policy development on student persistence at the institutional level.Journal of College Personnel 27: 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshmen persistence and voluntary dropout decision from a theoretical model.Journal of Higher Education 51: 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Chapman, D. W. (1983a). A multiinstitutional, path analytic validation of Tinto's model of college withdrawal.American Educational Research Journal 20: 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, Ernest T., and Chapman, David W. (1983b). Validation of a theoretical model of college withdrawal.Research in Higher Education 19(1): 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, Ernest T., Smart, John C., and Ethington, Corinna A. (1986). Long-term persistence of two-year college students.Research in Higher Education 24(1): 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshmen year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analytic validation of Tinto's model.Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, T. R. (1979).Non-academic factors influencing the withdrawal of academically ineligible black students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Office of Institutional Research (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 180-362).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotland, R. Lance, and Mark, Melvin M. (1985).Social Science and Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. (1977). Voluntary freshman attrition and patterns of social and academic integration in a university: A test of a conceptual model.Research in Higher Education 6: 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T., and Pascarella, E. T. (1978). The relation of students' precollege characteristics and freshmen year experience to voluntary attrition.Research in Higher Education 9: 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, Patrick, Theophilides, Christos, and Lorang, Wendell (1984). Influences on students' perceptions of their personal development during the first three years of college.Research in Higher Education 21(2): 178–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophilides, Christos, Terenzini, Patrick, and Lorang, Wendell (1984). Relation between freshmen-year experience and perceived importance of four-major educational goals.Research in Higher Education 20(2): 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 45(1): 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, Vincent (1987).Leaving College. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, R. A. (1987). Toward building models of community college persistence: A logic analysis.Research in Higher Education 26(2): 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grosset, J.M. Patterns of integration, commitment, and student characteristics and retention among younger and older students. Res High Educ 32, 159–178 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974435

Keywords

Navigation