Research in Higher Education

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 279–292 | Cite as

Holland environments as reinforcement systems

  • John C. Smart
Article

Abstract

Holland's (1973, 1985) theory of vocational choice stipulates that model environments seek toreinforce the characteristic predispositions and attitudes of their corresponding personality types. The results of this longitudinal study of the self-perceptions of more than 2,000 graduates from eight types of colleges and universities (Carnegie Commission, 1971) generally support the validity of this premise. For example, graduates prepared in investigative environments have higher intellectual self-esteem scores and those prepared in artistic environments have higher artistic self-esteem scores, when pre- and postcollege measures are controlled. These general patterns are consistent for graduates from the eight institutional types. The implications of these findings are discussed for those who study the intra- and interinstitutional diversity of colleges and universities and their differential impact on student developmental patterns.

Keywords

Longitudinal Study Reinforcement System General Pattern Education Research Model Environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. E. (1977).Strategic Policy Changes at Private Colleges. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1968).The College Environment. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1977).Four Critical Years: Effects of College on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A. W. (1982).Minorities in American Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Astin, A. W., and Holland, J. L. (1961). The environmental assessment technique: A way to measure college environments.Journal of Educational Psychology 52: 308–316.Google Scholar
  6. Astin, H. S., and Kent, L. (1983). Gender roles in transition.Journal of Higher Education 54: 309–324.Google Scholar
  7. Ayres, Q. W., and Bennett, R. W. (1983). University characteristics and student achievement.Journal of Higher Education 54: 516–532.Google Scholar
  8. Birnbaum, R. (1983).Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, B. S., and Webster, H. (1960). The outcomes of college.Review of Educational Research 30: 321–333.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, H. R. (1977).Investment in Learning: The Individual and Social Value of American Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1971).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Berkeley, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1980).Three Thousand Futures: The Next Twenty Years for Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, B. R., and Youn, T. I. (1976).Academic Power in the United States. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Corey, S. M. (1936). Attitude differences between college classes.Journal of Educational Psychology 27: 321–330.Google Scholar
  15. Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. M. (1969).The Impact of College on Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Hargens, L. L. (1975).Patterns of Scientific Research. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  17. Hearn, J. C., and Moos, R. H. (1978). Subject matter and classroom climate.American Educational Research Journal 15: 111–124.Google Scholar
  18. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1971).Institutions in Transition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Holland, J. L. (1973).Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Holland, J. L. (1985).Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Huitema, B. E. (1980).The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Newman, F. (1971).Report on Higher Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  23. Pace, C. R. (1974).The Demise of Diversity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development. In J. C. Smart (eds.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research pp. 1–61. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  25. Richards, J. M., Jr., and Jones, P. K. (1970). Faculty and curriculum as measures of college environment.Journal of Educational Psychology 61: 324–332.Google Scholar
  26. Smart, J. C. (1975). Environments as reinforcer systems in the study of job satisfaction.Journal of Vocational Behavior 6: 337–347.Google Scholar
  27. Smart, J. C. (1982). Faculty teaching goals: a test of Holland's theory.Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 180–188.Google Scholar
  28. Stadtman, V. A. (1980).Academic Adaptations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Trow, M. (1979). Aspects of diversity in American higher education. In H. J. Gans (ed.),On the Making of Americans: Essays in Honor of David Reisman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Smart
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EducationVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations