Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM): Measuring excellence in science teaching for professional development

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • America 2000: An education strategy sourcebook. (1991). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.W., & Roth, J.J. (1989). Teaching for meaningful and self-regulated learning of science. In J. Brophy (ed.),Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2 A research annual. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 265–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelo T.A., & Cross, K.P. (1993).Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J.L., & Sypher, H.E. (1988). A constructivist theory of communication and culture. In Y.Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (eds.),Theories of intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D.L. (1988). Prospective teachers' understanding of mathematics: What do they bring with them to teacher education? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Barth, R.S. (1988). School: A community of leaders. In A. Lieberman (ed.),Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L.G., & Murphy, J. (In press).Understanding the principalship: A metaphorical analysis from 1920 to 1990. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Berliner, D.C. (1987). In pursuit of expert pedagogue.Educational Researcher, 15 (7), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J.R., Firestone, W.A., & Richards, C.E., (eds.), (1991).Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice (Rutgers Symposium on Education). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolan, L., Lacefield, J., & Burry-Stock, J. (1993). Expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM): Concept Mapping Rubric-Measuring student conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association MSERA, New Orleans.

  • Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers.American Educational Research Journal, 26 (4), 473–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, E.B., Zhang, Z., Slater, W., & Bolland, K. (1993).Literature review for the expert science teaching evaluation (ESTEEM) J. Burry (ed.), Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J.A. (In press). Perspectives on methods and procedures for assessing various stages of teacher effectiveness,Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education.

  • — (1993)Science grading practice assessment inventory (SGPAI). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry-Stock, J.A. (1993).Expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM) manual. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J.A., & Bolland, K.A. (1991).Student outcomes assessment rubric (SOAR). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J.A., Bolland, K.A., Pittman, K., & Brennan, E. (1992). The process of developing a composite of expert science teaching. A search for excellence: What does expert science teaching really look like? Paper presented at the symposium conducted at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Burry, J.A., Bolland, K.A., Sunal, D., Pittman, K., Rice, J., Turner, M., Hedgepath, D., & Zhang (1991).Classroom observation rubric. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J.A., & Oxford, R.L. (1993).Measuring excellence in science teaching: The expert science teaching evaluation (ESTEM). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J.A., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Iran-Nejad, A., Oxford, R., & Bolen, L. (1993).Concept Mapping Rubric, Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J., & Shaw, D. (1988). Teachers and administrators differ in assessing teacher effectiveness.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J., Shaw, D.G., Chissom, B.S., & Laurie, C. (In press).Rater agreement indices for performance assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

  • Carter, K., Cushing, K., Sabers, D., Stein, P., & Berliner, D. (1988). Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom information.Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (3), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J.A., & Jacobson, S.L. (1990). An epilogue: Where is educational leadership going? In S.L. Jacobson & J.A. Conway (eds.),Educational leadership in an age of reform. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, W. (1965). Cognitive complexity and impression formation. In B.A. Maher (ed.),Progress in experimental personality research, New York: Academic Press, pp. 47–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. (1989).Restructuring in progress: Lessons from pioneering districts. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986).Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C.A. (1991). Measurement and research issues in teacher assessment.Educational Psychologist, 26(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R.F. (1989). Models of restructured schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Evertson, C.M. (1990). NSTA's Scope, Sequence and Coordination Project: Critical questions for a research agenda. In J.A. Shymansky & W.C. Kyle, Jr. (eds.),Establishing a research agenda: The Critical issues of science curriculum reform. Report of a conference sponsored by the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

  • Evertson, C.M., & Murphy, J. (In press). Beginning with the classroom: Implications for redesigning schools. In H. Marshall (ed.),Supporting student learning: Roots of educational change. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Evertson, C.M., & Randolph, C.H. (In press). Teaching practices and class size: A new look at an old issue.Peabody Journal of Education.

  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S.G. (1988).Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S. (1990). Teacher educator as researcher: An epistemological analysis of learning to teacher reading. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Hopkins, K.D., Stanley, J.C. & Hopkins, B.R. (1990).Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1955).The psychology of personal constructs. New York: North.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, W.C. (1991). The reform agenda and science education: Hegemonic control vs. counterhegemony.Science Education, 74, 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M., & Clark, C.M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzing.Educational Researcher, 19(4), 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching.Educational Researcher, 19(2), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J.G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Kapitan, R., Carlson, M.D., Kuerbis, P.J., Clark, R.C., Melle, G.M., Sachse, T.P., & Walton, E. (1990).Elementary school science for the 90s. Andover, MA: The Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G. (1987). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. Tanner (ed.),Critical issues in curriculum (Eighty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, R., Burry, J.A. (1990). What teachers need to know about assessing student achievement: Applications of the new NCME, AFT, and NEA standards. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Marshall, H.H. (1988). Work or learning: Implications of classroom metaphors.Educational Researcher, 17(9), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990). Beyond the workplace metaphor: The classroom as a learning setting.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthey, S.J., & Peterson, P.L. (1989). Teacher roles: Weaving new patterns in classroom pratice and school organization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • McNeil, L.M. (1990). Empowering students: Beyond defensive teaching in social studies. In C. Emihovich (ed.),Locating learning: Ethnographic perspectives on classroom research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morine-Dershimer, G. (1989). Preservice teachers' conceptions of content and pedagogy: Measuring growth in reflective, pedagogical decision-making.Journal of Teacher Education, 30(5), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1990a). Preparing school administrators for the 21 st century: The reform agenda. In B. Mitchell & L.L. Cunningham (eds.),Educational leadership and changing contexts of families, communities, and schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990b). The educational reform movement of the 1980s: A comprehensive analysis. In J. Murphy (ed.),The reform of American public education in the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991).Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1991).Toward high and vigorous standards for the teaching profession: Initial policies and perspectives of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (3rd ed.). Detroit: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. (1993).National science education standards: An enhanced sampler. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept maps and vee diagrams, two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning.Instructional Science 19, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984).Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, H.G. (1990). Reflections on the second wave of reform: Restructuring the teaching profession. In S.L. Jacobson & J.A. Conway (eds.),Educational leadership in an age of reform. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, K.M. (1992). Differences in the characteristics of extreme groups of expert science teachers: Implications for instructional practice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1987).Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, G.L. (1991). The materials of physics instruction.Physics Today, 44(9), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, H.M., Driver, M.S., & Streufert, S. (1967).Human information processing: Individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1990). Can research based teacher evaluation be saved?Journal of Personnel Evaluation, 4(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991). Teacher evaluation models project memorandum. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spandel, V., & Stiggins, R.J. (1990).Creating writers: Linking assessment and writing instruction. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks-Langer, G.M., & Colton, A.B. (1991). Synthesis of research on teachers' reflective thinking.Educational Leadership, 48(6), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L., et al. (1990). Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (CREATE) technical proposal funded by United States Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), awarded to Western Michigan University (Dan Stufflebeam, director), PR AWARD Number r117 Q00047, AFDA 84.117Q. Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., & Burry-Stock, J. (1993a). Expert Science teaching evaluation model (ESTEEM); teaching practices inventory (TPI): A self-report analysis. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Turner, M., & Burry-Stock, J. (1993b).Teaching practice inventory. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988).Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D.B. Harris (ed.),The concept of development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A.E. (1989). Professional teaching: A new paradigm for the management of education. In T.J. Sergiovanni, & J.H. Moore (eds.),Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.E. (1991). The constructivist learning model.Science Teacher, 51, 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.E., & Roy, R. (1993). STS: Most pervasive and most radical of reform approaches to “science” education. In R.E. Yager (ed.),What research says to the science teacher. Washington DC: National Science Teachers Association, 7, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavioral Studies/College of Education, University of Alabama, Box 870231, 35487-0231, Tuscaloosa, AL

    Judith A. Burry-Stock & Rebecca L. Oxford

Authors
  1. Judith A. Burry-Stock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca L. Oxford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burry-Stock, J.A., Oxford, R.L. Expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM): Measuring excellence in science teaching for professional development. J Pers Eval Educ 8, 267–297 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973725

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973725

Keywords

Search

Navigation