Skip to main content
Log in

Survey research in higher education

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although textbooks on educational research give only scant attention to survey research methodology, its extensive use in education provides a strong rationale for improving the preparation of educational researchers in effectively applying survey methods. This study reviews methods for dealing with nonresponse bias, the primary problem presented by survey methods. It also provides an updated review of the literature of studies investigating the effectiveness of incentives to increase survey response rates. We hypothesized that a reanalysis of reviewed studies, using a linear trend test, would resolve the inconsistencies found regarding the effectiveness of incentives to increase response rates. The results of the reanalysis and guidelines for educational researchers in systematically selecting and applying incentives to increase response rates are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. R. Personalizing mail questionnaire correspondence.Public Opinion Quarterly 1970–1971,34 272–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrack, S. D., and Scoble, H. M. Mail questionnaire efficiency: controlled reduction of non-response.Public Opinion Quarterly 1967,31 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, D. H. Colored stationary in direct-mail advertising.Journal of Applied Psychology 1957,41 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, H. H., Fuller, C., and Hare, A. P. Response rates in postal surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly 1974,38 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, D. J., and Sear, A. Questionnaire response rate: a methodological analysis.Social Forces 1969,43 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C. I.Elementary statistical procedures. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. P., Anderson, T., and Fulcher, D. G. Reappraising mail survey response rates.Journal of Marketing Research 1974,11 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., and Frey, J. H. Contribution of personalization to mail questionnaire response as a element of a previously tested method.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. N. Implications of non-response for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data.Public Opinion Quarterly 1960,24 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, J. W. The effect of color in direct mail advertising.Journal of Applied Psychology 1950,34 280–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdos, P. L. Successful mail surveys: high returns and how to get them.Printer's Ink 1957,258 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzel, M. J., and Walker, J. B. Effects of alternative follow-up procedures on mail survey response rates.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 219–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, B. D. Incentives to increase survey returns: social class considerations.Journal of Marketing Research 1975,12 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, M. S., Chung, L., Krontiz, R., and Cook, G. Mail survey response rates: their manipulation and impact.Journal of Marketing Research 1977,14 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullahorn, J. T., and Gullahorn, J. E. Increasing returns from non-respondents.Public Opinion Quarterly 1959,23 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullahorn, L. E., and Gullahorn, J. T. An investigation of the effects of three factors on response to mail questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 1963,27 294–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, E. E. Increasing mail questionnaire returns with a preliminary letter.Journal of Advertising Research 1965,5 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, W. E. Increasing response rate by choice of postage stamps.Public Opinion Quarterly 1974,38 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, J. R. Factors related to survey response rates.Journal of Applied Psychology 1975,60 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S. W., and Gleason, E. M. Using monetary inducement to increase response rates from mailed surveys.The Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuk, L., and Berenson, C. Mail surveys and response rates: a literature review.Journal of Marketing Research 1975,12 440–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, W. M., and Bressler, M. Increasing the responses to mail questionnaires: a research study.Public Opinion Quarterly 1958,22 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, J. B. Are bulk-rate occupants really unresponsive?Public Opinion Quarterly 1971,35 420–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, A. E. Increasing the rate of return in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing 1961,25 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S., and Gordon, G. Maximizing returns on mail questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 1958,22 568–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R., and Smith, P. Accumulating evidence: procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies.Harvard Educational Review 1971,14 429–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, A. S. A factorial experiment in inducing responses to a mail questionnaire.Sociology and Social Research 1965,49 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, A. S. Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: a review.Public Opinion Quarterly 1975,39 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, P. W. Comparability of personal attitude scale with mail administration with and without incentive.Journal of Applied Psychology 1954,38 238–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, M. T. Type of transmittal letter and questionnaire color as two variables influencing response rates in a mail survey.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. C.Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement. New York: David McKay, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. H., and Haug, A. F. How a preliminary letter affects mail survey returns and cost.Journal of Advertising Research 1969,9 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R. J., and Medford, T. S. The effect of advanced notice in mail surveys of homogeneous groups.Public Opinion Quarterly 1972,36 258–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. Responses to personal and form letters in mail surveys.Journal of Advertising Research 1966,7 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G.Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J. E. Influence of preliminary contact on mail returns.Journal of Marketing Research 1966,3 410–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. Education and survey research. In. C. Y. Glock (Ed.),Survey Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vocino, T. Three variables in stimulating responses to mailed questionnaire.Journal of Marketing 1977,41 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisanen, F. B. A note on the response to a mailed questionnaire.Public Opinion Quarterly 1954,18 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. J., & Burdick, R. K. Advance correspondence and error in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 1977,14 379–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. J. Improving the response rate in mail survey.Journal of Advertising Research 1965,5 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weilbacher, W. M., and Walsh, H. R. Mail questionnaires and the personalized letter of transmittal.Journal of Marketing 1952,16 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuqua, D.R., Hartman, B.W. & Brown, D.F. Survey research in higher education. Res High Educ 17, 69–80 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973664

Keywords

Navigation