Skip to main content
Log in

Faculty uses of doctoral training: Consideration of a technique for the differentiation of scholarly effort from research activity

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study are: (1) to differentiate scholarly effort from research activity, and (2) to test the notion that publications are a discrete measure of scholarly performance. Validity was established for 71 scholarly activities apart from publications; these were classified into two domains: the external-disciplinary colleague (EDC) and the institutional local-community (ILC). A mailed survey of a sample of PhD recipients in chemistry and psychology at 44 liberal arts colleges—Selectivity I yielded a 63% useable return on 186 respondents. High and low publishers (career and current) were compared on both EDC and ILC Domain performance. Findings were that high publishers (career and current) have higher levels of performance in both Domains than do low publishers (career and current).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babchuk, N., and Bates, A. P. Professor or producer: the two faces of academic man.Social Forces 1962,40 341–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E., and Dutton, J. E. Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists.Journal of Higher Education 1978,48 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B.Graduate Education in the U.S. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. L. Organizational implications of faculty roles—activity preferences. Paper presented at the Annual AERA Meeting, 1976, ERIC ED 134-089.

  • Biglan, A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,57 195–203. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,57 204–213. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T. The meaning of work in academia. InNew directions for institutional research: assessing faculty effort, No. 2, J. I. Doi (Ed.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M.The organization of academic work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.A classification of institutions of higher education. Berkeley, Calif.: Carnegie Commission, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. Universities report their faculty evaluation practices.Findings 1978,4 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S., and Cole, J. R.Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review 1965,30 699–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L.Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiduson, B. T. Productivity rate in research scientists.American Scientist 1966,65 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., and Lehman, E. W. Some dangers in ‘valid’ social measurement.The Annals 1967,373 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. and Hatt, P. K.Methods in social research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. Cosmopolitan and locals: toward an analysis of latent social roles.Administrative Science Quarterly 1957,2 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O.The scientific community. New York: Basic Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstadter, G. C.Principles of psychological measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. and Riesman, D.The academic revolution. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E. C. Jr. The work experience of American college professors: some data and an argument, AAHE,Current issues in higher education, 1979.

  • Leslie, L. L. Are response rates essential to valid surveys.Social Science Research 1972,1 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, D. Introduction: the structure of the academic professions.Sociology of Education 1974,47 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 1978,43 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, J. G. Some academic influences upon publication productivity.Social Forces 1951,29 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L. B., and Ford P. J.Reform in graduate and professional education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R.Academic Janus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, E. J.The graduate school and the decline of liberal education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K.The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I.Developing programs for faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Y. Standards of research publication: differences between the physical sciences and the social sciences.Research in Higher Education 1977,7 335–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., and Platt, G. M.The American academic profession: a pilot study. National Science Foundation, 1968 (mimeographed).

  • Parsons, T., and Platt, G. M.The American university. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D. C., and Andrews, F. H.Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F. Academic sponsorship and careers.Sociology of Education 1979,52 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. C., and Bates, A. P. The structure of socialization in the graduate school.Sociological Inquiry 1967,37 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. Intellectuals, tradition, and the tradition of intellectuals: some preliminary considerations.Daedalus, 101 21–34 (Spring, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., and Elton, C. F. Goal orientations of academic departments: a test of Biglan's model.Journal of Applied Psychology 1975,60 580–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, N. W.The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, W. A three dimensional view of faculty development.Journal of Higher Education 1975,46(6), 701–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, W. Awareness and use of academic research.Research in Higher Education 1977,7 743–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. The professor and his roles. InImproving college teaching, C. Lee (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braxton, J.M., Toombs, W. Faculty uses of doctoral training: Consideration of a technique for the differentiation of scholarly effort from research activity. Res High Educ 16, 265–282 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973587

Keywords

Navigation