Research in Higher Education

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 329–349 | Cite as

Preenrollment variables and academic performance as predictors of freshman year persistence, early withdrawal, and stopout behavior in an urban, nonresidential university

  • Ernest T. Pascarella
  • Paul B. Duby
  • Vernon A. Miller
  • Sue P. Rasher
Article

Abstract

Multiple group discriminant analysis was employed to determine the utility of preenrollment traits and academic performance in identifying freshman students who persisted, stopped out, or withdrew early from an urban, nonresidential university. An equation based on nine preenrollment variables significantly discriminated among the three groups and correctly identified 48.1% of an independent validation sample (p<.001 for the hypothesis that overall correct classification was a significant improvement on chance). The clearest separation based on preenrollment traits was between stopouts on the one hand and both persisters and withdrawals on the other. It was only after first-quarter academic performance was added to preenrollment traits that a sharp discrimination was found between persisters and early voluntary withdrawals.

Keywords

Discriminant Analysis Academic Performance Education Research Correct Classification Clear Separation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A.Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, A. Impact of dormitory living on students.Educational Record 1973a,54 204–210.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. Measurement and determinants of the outputs of higher education. In L. C. Solmon and P. J. Taubman (Eds.),Does college matter? New York: Academic Press, 1973b.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, J. Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition.Research in Higher Education 1980,12 155–187.Google Scholar
  5. Chickering, A. Commuting versus resident students: Overcoming educational inequities of living off campus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Cope, R., and Hannah, W.Revolving college doors: The causes and consequences of dropping out, stopping out, and transferring. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Graff, R., and Cooley, G. Adjustment of commuter and resident students.Journal of College Student Personnel 1970,11 54–57.Google Scholar
  8. Harrington, T. The literature on the commuter student.Journal of College Student Personnel 1972,13 546–550.Google Scholar
  9. Huberty, C. Discriminant analysis.Review of Educational Research 1975,45 543–598.Google Scholar
  10. Iffert, R.Retention and withdrawal of college students. (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bulletin No. 1). Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Kerlinger, F., and Pedhazur, E.Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Kish, L.Survey sampling. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Newcomb, T. Student peer-group influence and the intellectual outcomes of college experience. In R. Sutherland, W. Holtzman, E. Koile, and B. Smith (Eds.),Personality factors on the college campus. Austin, Texas: Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, University of Texas, 1962, 69–91.Google Scholar
  14. Pantages, T., and Creedon, C. Studies of college attrition: 1950–1975.Review of Educational Research 1978,48 540–552.Google Scholar
  15. Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. Interaction effects in Spady's and Tinto's conceptual models of college dropout.Sociology of Education 1979,52 197–210.Google Scholar
  16. Scott, S. Impact of residence hall living on college student development.Journal of College Student Personnel 1975,16 214–219.Google Scholar
  17. Spady, W. Dropout from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and syntheses.Interchange 1970,1 64–85.Google Scholar
  18. Stark, M. Commuter and residence hall students compared.Personnel and Guidance Journal 1965,44 277–281.Google Scholar
  19. Tinto, V. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical syntheses of recent research.Review of Educational Research 1975,45 89–125.Google Scholar
  20. Terenzini, P., and Pascarella, E. The relation of students' pre-college characteristics and freshman year experience to voluntary attrition.Research in Higher Education 1978,9 337–366.Google Scholar
  21. Ward, R., and Kurtz, T. The commuting student: A study of facilities at Wayne State University. Final report of the Commuter's Center Project, Educational Facilities Laboratories. Detroit: Michigan State University, January, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Welty, J. Resident and commuter students: Is it only the living situation?Journal of College Student Personnel 1976,17 465–468.Google Scholar
  23. Zaccararia, L., and Creaser, J. Factors relating to persistence in an urban commuter university.Journal of College Student Personnel 1971,12 256–291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernest T. Pascarella
    • 1
  • Paul B. Duby
    • 1
  • Vernon A. Miller
    • 1
  • Sue P. Rasher
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Illinois at Chicago CircleUSA

Personalised recommendations